Abstract
The number of osteoporotic fractures is rising in men and women, because of the demographic trend towards an aging population and an increase in the age-specific incidence of fractures. Although previous studies have examined the morbidity following hip fractures in women, there is little information on the sequelae of vertebral crush fractures in men. We have therefore collected data on loss of height, kyphosis, peripheral fractures and functional status in 63 men with symptomatic vertebral fractures. Loss of height was documented in 49% of the men, while kyphosis was present in 54%. A past history of 50 non-vertebral fractures was obtained in 27 patients (43%), involving the ribs (17), lower arm (13) and femoral neck (4). Each patient then completed the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), which gives information on perceived health. Men with vertebral crush fractures had higher scores for all six domains of the NHP when compared with age-matched and more elderly control subjects, implying greater morbidity. This was particularly marked for the energy, pain and mobility domains of the NHP. We conclude that there is considerable morbidity associated with vertebral crush fractures in men, which should be assessed in any trial of therapeutic intervention. This study suggests that the NHP may be a useful instrument in this regard.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. Involution osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1676–86.
Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ III. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporosis Int 1992;2:285–9.
Evans JG, Prudham D, Wandless I. A prospective study of fractures proximal femur: incidence and outcome. Publ Hlth Lond 1979;93:235–41.
Marottoli RA, Berkman LF, Cooney LM. Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:861–6.
Cooper C, Melton LJ. Vertebral fractures. BMJ 1992;304:793–4.
Bengner U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I. Changes in incidence and prevalence of vertebral fractures during 30 years. Calcif Tissue Int 1988;42:293–6.
Melton LJ III, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL. How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:1005–10.
Obrant KJ, Bengner U, Johnell O, Nilsson BE, Sernbo I. Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures: a sign of increasing osteoporosis in successive generations? Calcif Tissue Int 1989;44:157–67.
Francis RM, Sutcliffe A. Implications of osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. In: Drife JO, Studd JWW, editors. Hormone replacement therapy and osteoporosis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990:87–93.
Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 1985;35:185–8.
Baillie SP, Davison CE, Johnson FJ, Francis RM. Pathogenesis of vertebral crush fractures in men. Age Ageing 1992;21:139–41.
Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. The Nottingham Health Profile user's manual. Galen Research and Consultancy, 1989.
Ettinger B, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:449–56.
Leidig G, Minne HW, Sauer P, Wüster C, Wüster J, Lojen M, et al. A study of complaints and their relation to vertebral destruction in patients with osteoporosis. Bone Miner 1990;8:217–29.
Bergner M, Bobbin RA, Kressel S, Pollard WE, Gilson BS, Morris JR. The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv 1976;6:393–415.
Ross PD, Ettinger B, Davis JW, Melton LJ III, Wasnich RD. Evaluation of adverse health outcomes associated with vertebral fractures. Osteoporosis Int 1991;1:134–40.
Kanis JA, Minne WH, Meunier PJ, Ziegler R, Allender E. Quality of life and vertebral osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 1992;2:161–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scane, A.C., Sutcliffe, A.M. & Francis, R.M. The sequelae of vertebral crush fractures in men. Osteoporosis Int 4, 89–92 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623230
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623230