Abstract
A review of the literature on released-time programs shows a trend away from uncritical acceptance. Emerging skepticism about released time from teaching or service stems from a lack of evidence supporting its usefulness and from the mixed messages it gives about the value of teaching. Four demonstrational experiments confirm that skepticism by showing that (1) verified assessments of normal work loads contradict faculty claims of being too busy for additional scholarship; (2) faculty given released time usually persist in old habits; (3) new faculty showed no obvious benefits of a typical released-time program; and (4) faculty in released-time programs verbalized real doubts about how to use extra time for meaningful scholarship. A fifth experiment suggests an alternative to traditional released-time programs: faculty who claimed too little time for regular scholarship learned to produce significant amounts of writing by finding time for brief, daily writing sessions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astin, H. S., and Bayer, A. E. (1979). Pervasive sex differences in the academic reward system: Scholarship, marriage, and what else? In D. R. Lewis and W. E. Becker (eds.),Academic Rewards in Higher Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
Baldwin, R. G., and Krotseng, M. V. (1985). Incentives in the academy: Issues and Options. In R. G. Baldwin (ed.),Incentives for Faculty Vitality pp. 5–20. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Baron, R. A. (1983).Behavior in Organizations. Newton, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon.
Boice, R. (1984). Reexamination of traditional emphases in faculty development.Research in Higher Education 21: 195–209.
Boice, R. (1986a). Directory of California State University faculty development programs. Unpublished catalog. Long Beach, Calif.: California State University.
Boice, R. (1986b). Faculty development via field programs for middle-aged, disillusioned faculty.Research in Higher Education 25: 115–135.
Boice, R., and Johnson, K. (1984). Perception and practice of writing by faculty at a doctoral degree granting university.Research in Higher Education 21: 33–44.
Boice, R., and Kelly, K. (in press). Publishing viewed by two traditionally disenfranchised groups of academicians, women and women's college faculty.Written Communication, forthcoming.
Boice, R., and Makosky, V. (1986). Professional writing: Increasing productivity, decreasing pain.Proceedings of Faculty Evaluation and Development: Lessons Learned 22: 66–75.
Boice, R., and Myers, P. (in press). Which setting is healthier and happier, academe or private practice?Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.
Bowen, Z. (1985). Faculty incentives: Some practical keys and practical examples. In R. G. Baldwin (ed.),Incentives for Faculty Vitality pp. 33–43. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Braskamp, L. A. (1980). The role of evaluation in faculty development.Studies in Higher Education 5: 45–54.
Brookes, M. C. T., and German, K. L. (1983).Meeting the Challenges: Developing Faculty Careers. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Centra, J. A. (1978). Faculty development in higher education.Teachers College Record 80: 188–201.
Ciampa, B. J. (1978). Faculty development: The “haves” and the “have-nots.”Research in Education, February, pp. 1–18.
Cole, J. A. (1981). Women in science.American Scientist 69: 385–391.
Creswell, J. W. (1985).Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Cross, K. P. (1977). Notcan, butwill college teaching be improved?New Directions for Higher Education 17: 1–15.
Dailey, A. L., and Jeffries, C. A. (1983). Burnout strategy and intervention: Rationale and institutional strategies.Journal of the College and University Personnel Association 34(1): 15–21.
Dorfman, L. T. (1980). Emeritus professors: Correlates of professional activity in retirement.Research in Higher Education 12: 301–316.
Eble, K. E. (1986). Chairpersons and faculty development.The Department Advisor 1(4): 1–5.
Eble, K. E., and McKeachie, W. J. (1985).Improving Undergraduate Education through Faculty Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Finn, C. E. (1984). Trying higher education: An eight count indictment.Change 16(4): 29–51.
Fuller, J. A., and Evans, F. J. (1985). Recharging intellectual batteries: The challenge of faculty development.Educational Record 66(2): 31–34.
Gordon, P. J. (1986). What do professors do?Business Horizons, May/June, pp. 38–43.
Jacobson, R. L. (1985). New Carnegie data show faculty members uneasy about the state of academe and their own careers.The Chronicle of Higher Education 31(16): 1 and 24.
Kozma, R. B. (1978). Faculty development and the adaptation and diffusion of classroom innovations.Journal of Higher Education 49: 438–449.
McKeachie, W. J. (1983). Faculty as a renewable resource. In R. G. Baldwin and R. T. Blackburn (eds.),College Faculty: Versatile Human Resources in a Period of Constraint pp. 57–66. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nelsen, W. C. (1983). Faculty who stay: Renewing our most important resource. In R. G. Baldwin and R. T. Blackburn (eds.),College Faculty: Versatile Human Resources in a Time of Constraint pp. 67–83. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pearson, D. A., and Seiler, R. E. (1983). Environmental satisfiers in academe.Higher Education 12: 35–47.
Pellino, G. R., Blackburn, R. T., and Boberg, A. L. (1984). The dimensions of academic scholarship: Faculty and administrator views.Research in Higher Education 20: 103–115.
Penaskovic, R. (1985). Facing up to the publication gun.Scholarly Publishing 16: 136–140.
Raelin, J. A. (1984). An examination of deviant/adaptive behaviors in the organizational careers of professionals.Academy of Management Review 9: 413–427.
Rice, D. G. (1984). Being professional academically.To Improve the Academy 5: 5–13.
Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., and Paunonen, S. V. (1983). Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness in universities.Scientometrics 5: 93–116.
Smart, J. C., and McLaughlin, G. W. (1978). Reward structures of academic disciplines.Research in Higher Education 8: 39–55.
Sorcinelli, M. D. (1985). Faculty careers: Personal, institutional and societal dimensions. Paper presented at the Education Research Association Meeting, Chicago, April.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boice, R. Is released time an effective component of faculty development programs?. Res High Educ 26, 311–326 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992243
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992243