Abstract
A simple, handly and powerful tool, called the DIMO model based on the Shannon-Wiener index, has been developed for analysis and evaluation of species diversity at plant community (alpha) level. Three axes, i.e. species richness, species evenness and the Shannon-Wiener index, were plotted in a two-dimensional space. Any change in these parameters and their relationship can be easily analysed and demonstrated by the model. A modified Shannon-Wiener index,Q, based on the DIMO model, was constructed to integrate species richness and evenness. The model and theQ index were tested with the real-life data collected from vegetation monitoring by the Swedish National Environmental Monitoring Program (PMK) during a 12-year period. Because of its dynamic features, the DIMO model is especially suitable for biodiversity monitoring at community level and can be applied to other levels as well if one replaces species taxa by other categories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bråkenhielm, S.: 1977, ‘Vegetation Dynamics of Afforested Farmland in a District of Southeastern Sweden’,Acta Phytogeogr. Suec 63.
Clinton, B. D., Vose, J. M. and Swank, W. T.: 1993, ‘Site Preparation Burning to Improve Southern Appalachian Pine-hardwood Stands: Vegetation Composition and Diversity of 13-year-old stands’,Can. J. For. Res. 23, 2271–2277.
Kirkman, L. K., and Sharitz, R. R.: 1994, ‘Vegetation Disturbance and Maintenance of Diversity in Intermittently Flooded Carolina Bays in South Carolina'mEcological Applications 4, 177–188.
Kleemola, S. and Söderman, G.: 1993,Manual for Integrated Monitoring, programme Phase 1993–1996, Environment Data Centre, National Board of Waters and the Environment, Helsinki.
Li, H. and Reynolds, J. F.: 1993, ‘A New Contagion Index to Quantify Spatial Patterns of Landscapes’,Landscape Ecology 8, 155–162.
Peet, R. K.: 1974, ‘The Measurement of Species Diversity’,Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5, 285–307.
Pielou, E. C.: 1975,Ecological Diversity, New York: Wiley, pp. 165.
Reice, S. R.: 1994, ‘Nonequilibrium Determinants of Biological Community Structure’,American Scientist 82, 424–435.
Tatoni, T. and Roche, P.: 1994, ‘Comparison of Old Field and Forest Revegetation Dynamics in Provence’,J. Veg. Sci. 5, 295–302.
Thompson, D. B. A. and Brown, A.: 1992, ‘Biodiversity in Montane Britain: Habitat variation, Vegetation Diversity and Some Objectives for Conservation’,Biodiversity and Conservation 1, 179–208.
van der Maarel, E.: 1988b, ‘Species Diversity in Plant Communities in Relation to Structure and Synamics’, in H. J. During, M. J. A. Werger, and J. H., Willems (eds.),Diversity and Pattern in Plant Communities, The Hague: SPB, pp. 1–14.
Washington, H. G.: 1984, ‘Diversity, Biotic and Similarity Indices’,Water Res. 18, 653–694.
Zar, J. H.: 1984,Biostatistical Analysis, London: Prentice-Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qinghong, L. A model for species diversity monitoring at community level and its applications. Environ Monit Assess 34, 271–287 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554798
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554798