Skip to main content
Log in

A model for species diversity monitoring at community level and its applications

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple, handly and powerful tool, called the DIMO model based on the Shannon-Wiener index, has been developed for analysis and evaluation of species diversity at plant community (alpha) level. Three axes, i.e. species richness, species evenness and the Shannon-Wiener index, were plotted in a two-dimensional space. Any change in these parameters and their relationship can be easily analysed and demonstrated by the model. A modified Shannon-Wiener index,Q, based on the DIMO model, was constructed to integrate species richness and evenness. The model and theQ index were tested with the real-life data collected from vegetation monitoring by the Swedish National Environmental Monitoring Program (PMK) during a 12-year period. Because of its dynamic features, the DIMO model is especially suitable for biodiversity monitoring at community level and can be applied to other levels as well if one replaces species taxa by other categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bråkenhielm, S.: 1977, ‘Vegetation Dynamics of Afforested Farmland in a District of Southeastern Sweden’,Acta Phytogeogr. Suec 63.

  • Clinton, B. D., Vose, J. M. and Swank, W. T.: 1993, ‘Site Preparation Burning to Improve Southern Appalachian Pine-hardwood Stands: Vegetation Composition and Diversity of 13-year-old stands’,Can. J. For. Res. 23, 2271–2277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K., and Sharitz, R. R.: 1994, ‘Vegetation Disturbance and Maintenance of Diversity in Intermittently Flooded Carolina Bays in South Carolina'mEcological Applications 4, 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleemola, S. and Söderman, G.: 1993,Manual for Integrated Monitoring, programme Phase 1993–1996, Environment Data Centre, National Board of Waters and the Environment, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. and Reynolds, J. F.: 1993, ‘A New Contagion Index to Quantify Spatial Patterns of Landscapes’,Landscape Ecology 8, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R. K.: 1974, ‘The Measurement of Species Diversity’,Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5, 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C.: 1975,Ecological Diversity, New York: Wiley, pp. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reice, S. R.: 1994, ‘Nonequilibrium Determinants of Biological Community Structure’,American Scientist 82, 424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatoni, T. and Roche, P.: 1994, ‘Comparison of Old Field and Forest Revegetation Dynamics in Provence’,J. Veg. Sci. 5, 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. B. A. and Brown, A.: 1992, ‘Biodiversity in Montane Britain: Habitat variation, Vegetation Diversity and Some Objectives for Conservation’,Biodiversity and Conservation 1, 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Maarel, E.: 1988b, ‘Species Diversity in Plant Communities in Relation to Structure and Synamics’, in H. J. During, M. J. A. Werger, and J. H., Willems (eds.),Diversity and Pattern in Plant Communities, The Hague: SPB, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, H. G.: 1984, ‘Diversity, Biotic and Similarity Indices’,Water Res. 18, 653–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H.: 1984,Biostatistical Analysis, London: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qinghong, L. A model for species diversity monitoring at community level and its applications. Environ Monit Assess 34, 271–287 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554798

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554798

Keywords

Navigation