Abstract
Relationships among sexual harassment experiences, perceptions about harassment (definitions, seriousness ratings, commonness estimates), and attitudes (about both harassment and sex roles) were examined in order to investigate the role of ideology and consciousness in the reporting of sexual harassment experiences. University students responding to a survey were divided by sex (74 males, 136 females) and level of harassment experience (high, moderate, low) in a 3×2 factorial design. Results indicated that high experiencers estimated that sexual harassment was made common among other students than those with less experience. Other perceptual variables and attitudes were unrelated to experience level. Significant sex differences were present for definitions, for the Sexual Harassment Attitude Scale, and for the Macho Scale. Significant relationships were also present among definitions, seriousness ratings, and the two attitude measures. Results suggest that reporting experiences of harassment appears relatively independent of ideology or a sensitized consciousness. Implications for issues of representativeness of samples in harassment survey research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. W., Kottke, J. L., & Padgitt, J. S. Sexual harassment of university students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 1983, 24, 484–490.
Anderson, S. M. Sex-role typing as related to acceptance of self, acceptance of others, and discriminatory attitudes toward women. Journal of Research in Personality, 1978, 12, 410–415.
Beauvais, K. Workshops to combat sexual harassment: A case study of changing attitudes. Signs, 1986, 12, 130–145.
Brewer, M. B., & Berk, R. A. Beyond nine to five: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 1982, 38, 1–4.
Cammaert, L. P. How widespread is sexual harassment on campus? International Journal of Women's Studies, 1985, 8, 388–397.
Collins, E. G. C., & Blodgett, T. B. Sexual harassment... some see it ... some won't. Harvard Business Review, 1981, 59, 76–95.
Dzeich, B. W., & Weiner, L. The lecherous professor: Sexual harassment on campus. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
Farley, L. Sexual shakedown: The sexual harassment of women on the job. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Fisher, G. M., Wine, J. D., & Caplan, P. J. Sexual harassment among staff in a Canadian academic work setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Vancouver, BC, 1987.
Gayton, W. F., Sawyer, B. L., Baird, J. G., & Ozmon, K. L. Further validation of a new measure of machismo. Psychological Reports, 1982, 51, 820–822.
Gutek, B. A., Morasch, B., & Cohen, A. G. Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work setting. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 1983, 22, 30–48.
Kenig, S., & Ryan, J. Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus. Sex Roles, 1986, 15, 535–549.
Konrad, A. M., & Gutek, B. A. Impact of work experiences on attitudes toward sexual harassment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 422–438.
Lafontaine, E., & Tredeau, L. The frequency, sources and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations. Sex Roles, 1986, 15, 433–442.
Lott, B., Reilly, M. E., & Howard, D. R. Sexual assault and harassment: A campus community case study. Signs, 1982, 8, 296–319.
Mazer, D. B., & Percival, E. F. Students' experiences of sexual harassment at a small university. Sex Roles, 1989, 20, 1–22.
Powell, G. N. Definition of sexual harassment and sexual attention experienced. Journal of Psychology, 1983, 113, 113–117.
Powell, G. N. Effects of sex role identity and sex on definitions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 1986, 14, 9–19.
Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., & Gallogly, S. M. Sexual harassment of university students. Sex Roles, 1986, 15, 333–358.
Sherman, S. J., Presson, C. C., Chassin, L., Corty, E., & Olshavsky, R. The false consensus effect in estimates of smoking prevalence: Underlying mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1983, 9, 197–207.
Steinem, G. Outrageous acts and everyday rebellions. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1983.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. Sexual harassment in the federal workforce: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981.
Villemez, W. J., & Touhey, J. C. A measure of individual differences in sex stereotyping and sex discrimination: The “Macho” scale. Psychological Reports, 1977, 41, 411–415.
Weber-Burdin, E., & Rossi, P. H. Defining sexual harassment on campus: A replication and extension. Journal of Social Issues, 1982, 38, 111–120.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Grant in Aid of Small Universities for UPEI.
We gratefully acknowledge the invaluable work of our research assistants, Katie McInnis and Anne Marie McInnis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazer, D.B., Percival, E.F. Ideology or experience? The relationships among perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of sexual harassment in university students. Sex Roles 20, 135–147 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287987
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287987