Skip to main content
Log in

Axillary hidradenitis suppurativa: wide excision and flap coverage is best

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The extent of axillary excision and method of closure in 17 patients (29 axillae) with symptomatic chronic axillary hidradenitis suppurativa was analyzed. Limited excision of only the diseased skin led to recurrence in 2 of 3 patients, and excision of the hair-bearing skin alone, in 2 of 5 patients. There was no recurrence in 11 patients after wide excision. Some patients had more than one procedure. Three of four patients who had skin grafts used for closure, developed axillary contractures. Primary closure was achieved successfully in 7 patients (14 axillae). Flap coverage was used to close 12 axillae in 9 patients (3 patients had both axillae treated). These flaps included Limberg 4; random fasciocutaneous 3; parascapular fasciocutaneous: 5. Our experience suggests that wound closure after wide excision in the axilla is best achieved by means of a flap. While smaller defects can be closed with random fasciocutaneous flaps, wide axillary excision often leads to a large defect. The fasciocutaneous parascapular flap should be considered where a large defect exists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson DK, Perry AN (1975) Axillary hidradenitis. Arch Surg 110:69

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conway H, Stork RB, Climo S et al. (1952) The surgical treatment of chronic hidradenitis suppurativa. Surg Gynecol Obstet 95:453

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH (1983) The anatomical basis of the axillary fasciocutaneous pedicled flap. Br J Plast Surg 36:425

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harrison BJ, Mudge M, Hughes LE (1987) Recurrence after surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br Med J 294:294–487

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison SH (1964) Axillary hidradenitis. Br J Plast Surg 17:95

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lister GD, Gibson T (1972) Closure of rhomboid skin defects: the flaps of Limberg and Duformantel. Br J Plast Surg 25:300

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan WP, Harding KG, Hughes LE (1983) A comparison of skin grafting and healing by granulation following axillary excision for hidradenitis suppurativa. Ann R Coll Surg 65:235

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mortimer PS, Dawber PR, Moore RA (1986) A double blind controlled cross-over trial of cyproterone acetate in females with hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 115:263

    Google Scholar 

  9. O'Brien J, Wysocke J, Anaston G (1976) Limberg flap coverage for axillary defects resulting from excision of hidradenitis suppurativa. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:354

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paletta C, Jurkiewicz MJ (1987) Hidradenitis suppurativa. Clin Plast Surg 14:383

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paletta FX (1963) Hidradenitis suppurativa: pathologic study and use of skin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 31:307

    Google Scholar 

  12. Piggott H, Ellis H (1975) Chronic hidradenitis suppurativa: a report of 9 cases. Br J Surg 62:394

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pollock WJ (1972) Axillary hidradenitis suppurativa. Plast Reconstr Surg 49:22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tasche C, Angelats J, Jayaram B (1975) Surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa of the axilla. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:559

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tolhurst DE, Haeseker B (1982) Fasciocutaneous flaps in the axillary region. Br J Plast Surg 35:430

    Google Scholar 

  16. Watson JD (1985) Hidradenitis suppurativa — a clinical review. Br J Plast Surg 38:567

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hudson, D.A., Krige, J.E.J. Axillary hidradenitis suppurativa: wide excision and flap coverage is best. Eur J Plast Surg 16, 94–97 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196440

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196440

Key words

Navigation