Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of the relationship among electronystagmographic, audiologic, and self-report descriptors of dizziness

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Although descriptions of dizziness constitute a major category of complaints among patients seen in many clinical practices, the actual significance of the patient's report of symptoms has been disputed. Furthermore, the relationship of report to outcomes of clinical tests of the audio-vestibular system has not been well described. The present study examined the relationship of a self-report measure to results of electronystagmographic and audiometric evaluations in a consecutive sampling of patients at a Veterans Administration Medical Center. The findings reflected poor predictability of peripheral vestibular involvement when using the self-reporting questionnaire by patients, even when combined with audiometric observations. The utility of the self-report approach is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barber HO, Stockwell CW (1980) Manual of electronystagmography. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  2. Busis SN (1973) Diagnostic evaluation of the patient presenting with vertigo. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 6:3–23

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carhart R (1968) Clinical determination of abnormal auditory adaptation. Arch Otolaryngol65:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carhart R, Jerger J (1959) Preferred method for clinical determination of pure tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Dis 24:330–345

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirsch IJ, Davis H, Silverman SR, Reynolds EG, Eldert E, Benson RW (1952) Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Dis 17:321–337

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jerger J, Harford E, Clemis J, Alford B (1974) The acoustic reflex in eighth nerve disorders. Arch Otolaryngol99:409–413

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jonkees LBW (1978) The dizzy, the giddy and the vertiginous. ORL 40:293–302

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kileny P, McCabe BF, Ryu JH (1980) Effects of attentionrequiring tasks on vestibular nystagmus. Ann Otol 89: 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olsen W, Noffsinger D (1974) Comparison of one new and three old tests of auditory adaptation. Arch Otolaryngol 99: 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rubin W (1973) Whiplash with vestibular involvement. Arch Otolaryngol 97:85–87

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salman SD (1981) The evaluation of vertigo and the electronystagmogram. J Laryngol Otol 95:465–469

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simmons FB (1979) An atlas of electronystagmography. Grune and Stratton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spitzer J (1983) The Pre-ENG checklist: considerations prior to test administration. Hear Instru 34:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tillman T, Olsen W (1973) Speech audiometry. In: Jerger J (ed) Modern developments in audiology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spitzer, J.B. An evaluation of the relationship among electronystagmographic, audiologic, and self-report descriptors of dizziness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 247, 114–118 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183180

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183180

Key words

Navigation