Skip to main content
Log in

Host-plant resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum in tomato germplasm

  • Regular Research Paper
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seedlings of two hundred and thirty-three accessions of the tomato collection maintained at the Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba, Costa Rica (CATIE) and 7 cultivars used as controls were evaluated for host-plant resistance to 4 virulent strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum representing race 1 biovars 1 and 3. In general, biovar 3 strains wilted seedlings faster than biovar 1 strains but, after 20 days post-inoculation, no significant differences were noted in susceptible control ratings. Significant differences for disease index were noted, but no line with complete resistance was found. For the USA biovar 1 strain UW-25, only 5 accessions, CATIE 17331, 17334, 17349, 17739, 17740, and 2 of the control cultivars, ‘Hawaii 7998’ and ‘UC-82B’ showed some degree of resistance. Conversely, both the frequency and the degree of resistance were high for Costa Rican biovar 1 strain UW-256. For biovar 3, the Costa Rican strain UW-255 was more virulent than the Peruvian strain UW-130. Eight CATIE accessions, 5539, 17331, 17333, 17334, 17345, 17349, 17742, and MIP-CH1, were as resistant as the resistant control ‘Hawaii 7998’ to 3 strains and accession 17740 was as resistant as ‘Hawaii 7998’ to all 4 strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta, JC, Gilbert, JC & Quiñon, VL (1964) Heritability of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 84:455–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragaki, M & Quiñon, VL (1965) Bacterial wilt of ornamental gingers (Hedychium ssp.) caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Plant Dis Rep 49:378–379

    Google Scholar 

  • AVRDC (1989) 1989 Progress report. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, SE, Boelena, BH, Serfontein, JJ & Swaneopoel, AE (1990) ‘Rotam 4’, a multiple disease resistant fresh-market tomato. HortScience 20(3):458–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, SE, Louw, AJ & Aucamp, E (1985) ‘Rodade’ bacterial resistant tomato. HortScience 20(3):458–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Buddenhagen, IW & Kelman, A (1964) Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2:203–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Buddenhagen, IW, Sequeira, L & Kelman, A (1962) Designation of races in Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathol 52:726 (Abst.)

    Google Scholar 

  • CATIE (1990) Guía para el manejo integrado de plagas del cultivo de tomate. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseãnza, CATIE. Proyecto Regional de Manejo Integrado de Plagas. Serie Técnica. Informe Técnico/CATIE N 151. Turrialba, Costa Rica

  • Cook, D, Barlow, E & Sequeira, L (1989) Genetic diversity of Pseudomonas solanacearum: detection of restriction fragment length polymorphisms with DNA probes that specify virulence and the hypersenstive response. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 2(3):113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D, Barlow, E & Sequeira, L (1990) DNA probes as tools for the study of host-pathogen evolution: the example of Pseudomonas solanacearu: In: Hennecke, H & Verna, DP (eds) Advances in Molecular Genetics of Plant-Microbe Interactions. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Molecular Genetics of Plant-microbe Interactions, pp 103–108. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leon, G (1987) Proceso para la obtención de resistencia de tomate a Pseudomonas solanacearum en Panamá. Manejo Integrado Plagas 5:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, KA & Gomez, AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd ed). An International Rice Research Institute Book. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • González, WG & Summers, WL (1995) A comparison of Pseudomonas solanacearum resistant tomato cultivars as hybrid parents. J Am Hort Sci 120:891–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimault, V & Prior, P (1993) Bacterial wilt resistance in tomato associated with tolerance of vascular tissues to Pseudomonas solanacearum. Plant Pathol 42:589–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque, MA & Echandi, E (1984) Characteristics of strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from tobacco in North Carolina. Phytopathology 74:858 (Abst.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, AC (1964) Characteristics of Pseudomonas solanacearum. J Appl Bacteriol 27(2):265–277

    Google Scholar 

  • He, LY, Sequeira, L & Kelman, A (1983) Characteristics of strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from China. Plant Dis 67(12):1357–1361

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson WR & Jenkins SF (1977) ‘Venus’ and ‘Saturn’: two new tomato varieties combining desirable horticultural features with southern bacterial wilt resistance. North Carolina Agric Exp Sta Res Bull 444

  • Jaworski, CA, Phatak, SC, Ghate, SR, Gitaitis, RD & Widrlechner, MP (1987) GA 1565–2–4 BWT, GA 219–1–2 BWT, GA 1095–1–4 BWT, and GA 1405–1–2 BW bacterial wilt-tolerant tomato. HortScience 22(2):234–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman A (1953) the bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. North Carolina Agric Exp Sta Tech Bull 99

  • Kelman, A (1954) The relationship of pathogencity in Pseudomonas solanacearum to colony appearance on tetrazolium medium. Phytopathology 44:693–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasso, R (1974) Desarrollo de variedades de tomate industrial tolerantes a Pseudomonas solanacearum mediante cruza interespecífica. Fitotec Latinoam (Ven) 10(1):36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, RL & Sequeira, L (1989) Phenotypic diversity in strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum isolated from a single potato field in northeastern Florida. Plant Dis 73:960–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Mew, TW & Ho, WC (1977) Effect of soil temperature on resistance of tomato cultivars to bacterial wilt. Phytopathology 67:909–911

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, RA, Inch, AJ, Herrington, ME & Saranah, J (1983) ‘Scorpio’: a tomato resistant to bacterial wilt biovar 3. Aust Plant Pathol 12:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouamba, A, Laterrot, H & Moretti, A (1988) A case of relation between resistances to Pseudomonas solanacearum and Verticillium pathotype 2. TGC Report 38:43–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, RGD & Torrie, JH (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens MA, Dickinson GL & Aguirre MS (1976) ‘UC-82’ a high yielding processing tomato. University of California, Davis, USA Veget Crops Ser 183

  • Stolberg A, Bustamante E, Jiménez JM & González WG (1986) Caracterización y evaluación de 171 introducciones de tomate (Lycopersicon ssp.) contra patógenos de importancia enconómica en Costa Rica. In: PCCMCA (ed) Resúmenes XXXIII Reunion Anual PCCMCA, p 258. Guatemala

  • Valdez, RB (1985) Bacterial wilt in the Philippines. Proceeding and International Workshop. PCARRD, Los Baños Philippines. ACIAR Proc 13:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Velupillai, M & Stall, RE (1985) Variation among strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from Florida. Proc Fl State Hortic Soc 97:209–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, PH (1988) Screening for resistance to diseases. In: Brown, AHD, Frankel, OH, Marshall, DR & Williams, JT (eds) The Use of Plant Genetic Resources, pp 336–362. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Journal Paper No. J-16011 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project 3123.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González, W.G., Summers, W.L. Host-plant resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum in tomato germplasm. Genet Resour Crop Evol 43, 569–574 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138833

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138833

Key words

Navigation