Skip to main content

Assessing Safety of Dual-Purpose Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aviation System Risks and Safety

Part of the book series: Springer Aerospace Technology ((SAT))

  • 838 Accesses

Abstract

The review materials are presented that contain a summary of the main positions of the RRS doctrine and the SST tools in connection with the assessment of the prospects for the development of SMSs (AA SMS) and corresponding GOST-R standards in civil aviation of the Russian Federation, taking into account ICAO recommendations on the basis of Annex 19 for dual-purpose ATSs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Evdokimov VG (2011) Integrated logistics support for the production of K-32 helicopters.—“Aviatekhpriemka”, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. CAP 426 (2006) Helicopter external load operations/safety regulation group. West Sussex 2006

    Google Scholar 

  3. Instructions for transportation of goods on the external suspension of helicopters. MTR of the Russian Federation (№ Kr-2-r of 8.01.2004). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Safety provisions (2010) Helicopter European safety group and Jsc Allied Aviation Consulting—Ehest (ESSI). JSC “AAC”, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guidance on hazard identification (2010) SMS WG (ECAST (ESSI) Working group on safety management system and safety culture). Handwritten. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Standard for the assessment of major aviation risks. Version 4 (Threats). (Raw material industries). Flight Safety Foundation. Melbourne (Australia), 2012. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gipich GN, Evdokimov VG, Kuklev EA (2010) Methodical provisions of the classifier “SMS terms and definitions” in the field of flight safety management. Coll.of papers of the NTC “Rostekhregulirovanie”, vol. 2. Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gipich GN, Evdokimov VG (2011) The concept in the field of standardization of principles and procedures for the development of a national version of the system and manual for safety management in the production of aircraft in the UAC at the state level in the Russian Federation. Report (printed) in the “UAC Bulletin” vol. 2 1. Moscow, pp 65–70 (in press). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evdokimov VG (2009) Scientific basis for the implementation of the state targeted program for the safety of aviation equipment in civil aviation of the russian federation in 2010–2011 based on the requirements of integrated logistics support for production. J Air Trans. Moscow, pp 32–37. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evdokimov VG, Gipich GN (2006) Some issues in the methodology of assessment and prediction of air transport risks. In: The 5th international conference “Aviation and Astronautic Science 2006”, Abstracts, Moscow pp 75–76. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Evdokimov VG, Grushchanskiy VA, Kavtaradze EA (2008) On the system safety of information support for the development of complex social systems. Fundamental problems of system safety: Coll. of papers/RAS Dorodnitsyn CC. Moscow, University Book, pp 67–77. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aronov IZ et al (2009) Reliability and safety of technical systems. Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gipich GN, Evdokimov VG, Shapkin VS (2013) Assessments of the system safety for industrial technical complexes on the basis of the theory of risks in the aviation industry and in the field of nuclear energy. Scientific bulletin of the MSTU CA. No. 187(1). Moscow, pp 46–49. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Technical description of ACARS for A-380 aircraft. Express information, Moscow, 2010 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ryabinin IA (1997) Reliability, survivability and safety of ship electric power systems. Kuznetsov Naval Academy, St. Petersburg. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kirpichev IG (2011) On the prospects and problems in developing the infrastructure for the maintenance of An-140, A-148 aircraft. Aircraft construction “Aviation Industry”, vol 2. Moscow , 55 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Risk management—Vocabulary—Guidelines for use in standarts. PD ISO/IEC, Guide 73: 2002. B51: 2009

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evdokimov VG (2010) Harmonization of Russia’s regulatory and legal framework in the field of industrial safety. Coll. of papers “Aviatechobozrenie”, vol. 8. Moscow, pp 83–89 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Evdokimov VG (2011) Acceptable level of safety of the Russian aviation system. International Aviation and Space Magazine “AviaSouz”. NQ 1 (34) January–February (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Amer MY (2012) 10 things you should know about safety management systems (SMS). SM ICG, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gosatomnadzor of the Russian Federation (1997) General provisions for ensuring the safety of nuclear power plants. PNAE G-I-011-97 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Malinetskiy GG, Kulba VV, Kosyachenko SA, Shnirman MG et al (2000) Risk management. Risk. Sustainable development. Synergetics. Moscow, Nauka, Series “Cybernetics”, RAS. p 431 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fujita M (2009) Frequency of rare event occurrences (ICAO collision risk model for Separation minima). RVSM. ICAO, Doc. 2458. Tokio: EIWAC 2009

    Google Scholar 

  24. SMM (Safety Management Manual): Doc 9859_AN474–Doc FAA: 2012

    Google Scholar 

  25. General rules for risk assessment and management (resource management at life cycle stages, risk and reliability analysis management—URRAN). JSC Russian Railways standard STO RR 1.02.034-2010. Moscow, (2010) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuklev E.A. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuklev E.A., Shapkin V.S., Filippov V.L., Shatrakov Y.G. (2019). Assessing Safety of Dual-Purpose Systems. In: Aviation System Risks and Safety. Springer Aerospace Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8122-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8122-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8121-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8122-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics