Skip to main content

Diagnostic Criteria for AUS/FLUS in the Second Edition Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thyroid FNA Cytology
  • 1339 Accesses

Abstract

Although approximately 30% of FNAs result in indeterminate diagnoses, a comprehensive diagnostic approach to thyroid follicular cell tumors was provided by the Bethesda system. When histological type is uncertain, risk stratification based on cellular atypia and architectural atypia is the most objective approach and basic classification schema that covers all histological types of primary thyroid carcinomas and other benign conditions. The Bethesda system risk stratifies the indeterminate cytological category into three subcategories morphologically: low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk [1, 2]. Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS) is the low risk indeterminate category, and all histological types of malignancy are found on histology. The Bethesda system recommended subcategorization of AUS/FLUS nodules, which are detailed and illustrated in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ali SZ, Cibas ES, editors. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Definitions, criteria and explanatory notes. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 1–166.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ali SZ, Cibas ES. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: definitions, criteria and explanatory notes. New York, NY: Springer; 2018. p. 1–236.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Kakudo K, Higuchi M, Hirokawa M, et al. Thyroid FNA cytology in Asian practice-active surveillance for indeterminate thyroid nodules reduces overtreatment of thyroid carcinomas. Cytopathology. 2017;28:455–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bychkov A, Keelawat S, Agarwal S, et al. Impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a multi-institutional study in five Asian countries. Pathology. 2018;50:411–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Renshaw AA. Focal features of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid in fine needle aspiration material are strongly associated with papillary carcinoma at resection. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;118:208–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weber D, Brainard J, Chen L. Atypical epithelial cells, cannot exclude papillary carcinoma, in fine needle aspiration of the thyroid. Acta Cytol. 2008;52:320–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abele JS, Levine RA. Diagnostic criteria and risk-adapted approach to indeterminate thyroid cytodiagnosis. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118:415–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Olson MT, Clark DP, Erozan YS, et al. Spectrum of risk of malignancy in subcategories of ‘atypia of undetermined significance’. Acta Cytol. 2011;55:518–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hyeon J, Ahn S, Shin JH, et al. The prediction of malignant risk in the category ‘atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance’ of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology using subcategorization and BRAF mutation results. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:368–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohori NP, Schoedel KE. Variability in the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance diagnosis in the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: Sources and recommendations. Acta Cytol. 2011;55:492–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cibas ES, Baloch ZW, Fellegara G, et al. A prospective assessment defining the limitations of thyroid nodule pathologic evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:325–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Faquin WC, Cibas ES, Renshaw AA. “Atypical” cells in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens of benign thyroid cysts. Cancer Cytopathol. 2005;105:71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Renshaw AA. “Histiocytoid” cells in fine-needle aspirations of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Frequency and significance of an under-recognized cytologic pattern. Cancer Cytopathol. 2002;96:240–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2015;26:1–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. VanderLaan PA, Krane JF, Cibas ES. The frequency of ‘Atypia of undetermined significance’ interpretation is negatively correlated with histologically proven malignant outcomes. Acta Cytol. 2011;55:512–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Renshaw AA, Gould EW. Reducing indeterminate thyroid FNAs. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123:237–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krane JF, VanderLaan PA, Faquin WC, et al. The atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: malignant ratio: a proposed performance measure for reporting in the Bethesda System for thyroid cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2012;120:111–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. VanderLaan PA, Marqusee E, Krane JF. Clinical outcome for atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: should repeated FNA be the preferred initial approach? Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135(5):770–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baloch Z, LiVolsi VA, Jain P, Jain R, Aljada I, Mandel S, Langer JE, Gupta PK. Role of repeat fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the management of thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;29:203–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Higuchi M, Hirokawa M, Kanematsu R, et al. Impact of the modification of the diagnostic criteria in the 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a report of a single institution in Japan. Endocr J. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ18-0290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kennichi Kakudo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kakudo, K., Liu, Z., Ren, Y., Wakasa, T. (2019). Diagnostic Criteria for AUS/FLUS in the Second Edition Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. In: Kakudo, K. (eds) Thyroid FNA Cytology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1897-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1897-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1896-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1897-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics