Skip to main content

Enhancing Learning Through School Science Investigation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1207 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we reflect on our findings and their implications. We consider the nature of student learning that we observed and the teachers’ beliefs and practices that supported this learning. We discuss changes in practice and what is needed to support such change. We review the role of school science investigation and the potential it has for supporting/scaffolding/driving student learning, and present a model, developing further the thinking of others, that summarises teacher strategies which support different types of learning through science investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. J. (2012). Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 1035–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. W. (2007). Perspectives on science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 3–30). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. (1988). Teachers in science education. In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education. London: The Farmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, A. (2015). Capabilities for living and lifelong learning: What’s science got to do with it?. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsworthy, A., Watson, R., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1998). Sometimes it’s not fair. Primary Science Review, 53, 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipkins, R., Bolstad, R., Baker, R., Jones, A., Barker, M., Bell, B., … Taylor, I. (2002). Curriculum, learning and effective pedagogy: A literature review in science education. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2008). Student experiences of carrying out a practical science investigation under direction. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1201–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. High school science laboratories: Role and vision. Retrieved from http://www.informalscience.org/images/research/Robin_Millar_Final_Paper.pdf.

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. (2009). Can teaching about evidence encourage a creative approach in open-ended investigations? School Science Review, 90, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A. (2000). Designing teaching situations in the secondary school. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 27–47). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azra Moeed .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moeed, A., Anderson, D. (2018). Enhancing Learning Through School Science Investigation. In: Learning Through School Science Investigation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1616-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1616-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1615-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1616-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics