Skip to main content

Totally Obstructed Biliary Stricture I: Concept and Methods of Magnetic Compression Anastomosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Advanced ERCP for Complicated and Refractory Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases

Abstract

Various etiologies can result in bile duct stricture. In particular, it is a major complication after a biliary operation, such as living-donor liver transplantation. However, despite the development of endoscopic and percutaneous therapies, no treatment protocol has yet been established for complete bile duct obstruction or severe bile duct stricture. Several studies have succeeded in recanalization of biliary strictures using magnets. This new treatment technique has been proven to be effective and safe for complete bile duct obstructions or severe bile duct strictures that cannot be treated using conventional methods. In this chapter, we discuss the development of magnetic compression anastomosis and detail the treatment methods and results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kaidar-Person O, et al. Compression anastomosis: history and clinical considerations. Am J Surg. 2008;195(6):818–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jamshidi R, et al. Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(1):222–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aggarwal R, Darzi A. Compression anastomoses revisited. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(6):965–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kopelman D, et al. Compression gastrointestinal anastomosis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4(6):821–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardy KJ. Non-suture anastomosis: the historical development. Aust N Z J Surg. 1990;60(8):625–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy JB. Cholecysto-intestinal, gastro-intestinal, entero-intestinal anastomosis, and approximation without sutures. Med Rec N Y. 1892;42:665–76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Swain CP, Mills TN. Anastomosis at flexible endoscopy: an experimental study of compression button gastrojejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(6):628–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pryor HI 2nd, et al. Multiple magnetic foreign body ingestion: a surgical problem. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(1):182–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease, C and Prevention. Gastrointestinal injuries from magnet ingestion in children--United States, 2003–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(48):1296–300.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cauchi JA, Shawis RN. Multiple magnet ingestion and gastrointestinal morbidity. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87(6):539–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Honzumi M, et al. An intestinal fistula in a 3-year-old child caused by the ingestion of magnets: report of a case. Surg Today. 1995;25(6):552–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen A, et al. Early experiences with magnetic rings in resection of the distal colon. Neth J Surg. 1980;32(1):20–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saveliev VS, Avaliani MV, Bashirov AD. Endoscopic magnetic cholecystodigestive anastomoses: personal technique for palliative treatment of distal bile duct obstruction. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1993;3(2):99–112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lambe T1, Ríordáin MG, Cahill RA, Cantillon-Murphy P. Magnetic compression in gastrointestinal and bilioenteric anastomosis: how much force? Surg Innov. 2014;21(1):65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Savelev VS, et al. Endoscopic biliodigestive anastomosis with the use of magnets (experimental and clinical study). Khirurgiia (Mosk). 1993;3:10–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yamanouchi E, et al. A new interventional method: magnetic compression anastomosis with rare-earth magnets. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1998;22(Suppl 1):S155.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jang SI, et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis is useful in biliary anastomotic strictures after living donor liver transplantation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(5):1040–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jang SI, et al. Recanalization of refractory benign biliary stricture using magnetic compression anastomosis. Endoscopy. 2014;46(1):70–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takao S, et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for benign obstruction of the common bile duct. Endoscopy. 2001;33(11):988–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Itoi T, et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis: a novel technique for canalization of severe hilar bile duct strictures. Endoscopy. 2005;37(12):1248–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Okajima H, et al. Magnet compression anastomosis for bile duct stenosis after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005;11(4):473–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Avaliani M, et al. Magnetic compression biliary-enteric anastomosis for palliation of obstructive jaundice: initial clinical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(5):614–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oya H, et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for bile duct stenosis after donor left hepatectomy: a case report. Transplant Proc. 2012;44(3):806–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suyama K, et al. Recanalization of obstructed choledochojejunostomy using the magnet compression anastomosis technique. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(1):230–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mita A, et al. Nonsurgical policy for treatment of bilioenteric anastomotic stricture after living donor liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 2008;21(4):320–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mimuro A, et al. A novel technique of magnetic compression anastomosis for severe biliary stenosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(2):283–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lim HC, et al. Magnet compression anastomosis for bilioenteric anastomotic stricture after removal of a choledochal cyst: a case report. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;41:180–4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Akita H, et al. Use of a metallic-wall stent in the magnet compression anastomosis technique for bile duct obstruction after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2008;14(1):118–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yukawa N, et al. A case of magnetic compression anastomosis between the common bile duct and the duodenum after distal gastrectomy with Roux-Y reconstruction and cholecystectomy. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;105(10):1523–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Matsuno N, et al. A nonsuture anastomosis using magnetic compression for biliary stricture after living donor liver transplantation. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2009;56(89):47–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Itoi T, et al. Magnetic compression duct-to-duct anastomosis for biliary obstruction in a patient with living donor liver transplantation. Gut Liver. 2010;4(Suppl 1):S96–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Itoi T, et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for biliary obstruction: review and experience at Tokyo Medical University Hospital. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18(3):357–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lambe T, et al. Magnetic compression in gastrointestinal and bilioenteric anastomosis: how much force? Surg Innov. 2014;21(1):65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cope C. Evaluation of compression cholecystogastric and cholecystojejunal anastomoses in swine after peroral and surgical introduction of magnets. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995;6(4):546–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cope C. Creation of compression gastroenterostomy by means of the oral, percutaneous, or surgical introduction of magnets: feasibility study in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995;6(4):539–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pichakron KO, et al. Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(1):42–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wall J, et al. MAGNAMOSIS IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy. 2013;45(8):643–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gonzales KD, et al. Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(6):1291–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cope C, et al. Stent placement of gastroenteric anastomoses formed by magnetic compression. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(10):1379–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yan X, et al. Portacaval shunt established in six dogs using magnetic compression technique. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e76873.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jang SI, et al. Treatment of completely obstructed benign biliary strictures with magnetic compression anastomosis: follow-up results after recanalization. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(5):1057–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dumonceau JM, et al. Plastic and metal stents for postoperative benign bile duct strictures: the best and the worst. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47(1):8–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bonnel DH, et al. Placement of metallic stents for treatment of postoperative biliary strictures: long-term outcome in 25 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(6):1517–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ernst O, et al. Biliary leaks: treatment by means of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Radiology. 1999;211(2):345–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vogel SB, et al. Evaluation of percutaneous transhepatic balloon dilatation of benign biliary strictures in high-risk patients. Am J Surg. 1985;149(1):73–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Muraoka N, et al. Yamanouchi magnetic compression anastomosis for bilioenteric anastomotic stricture after living-donor liver transplantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16(9):1263–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jang SI, et al. Maintenance of the fistulous tract after recanalization via magnetic compression anastomosis in completely obstructed benign biliary stricture. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:1393–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Ki Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kim, Y.L., Jang, S.I., Lee, D.K. (2020). Totally Obstructed Biliary Stricture I: Concept and Methods of Magnetic Compression Anastomosis. In: Lee, D. (eds) Advanced ERCP for Complicated and Refractory Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0608-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0608-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0607-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0608-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics