Abstract
Though it is based on scientific inferences and takes on a statistic and probabilistic nature, epidemiological evidence is often used at present in lawsuits in relation to damages. In particular, the point of contention in recent lawsuits for damages due to tobacco companies’ illegal acts has been whether or not causal relations between smoking and diseases are proven by epidemiological data submitted by the plaintiffs as evidence. Although legal inferences based on correct causal relations are very important for realizing legal justice and for relieving victims, related research in terms of basic law has been insufficient. Consequently, the present study compares and analyzes legal causal inferences and epidemiological causal inferences to harmonize the two within the realm of jurisprudence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Decision of the Supreme Court of Korea 2000Da65666 (2002. 10. 22.); The Decision of the Supreme Court of Korea 2008Da17776 (2011. 9.29.)
- 2.
The Decision of the Appellate Court of Seoul 2002Na32662 (2006. 1. 26.)
- 3.
The Decision of the Supreme Court of Korea 99Da43448∙99Da43455 (2000. 1. 14.)
References
Gordis, L. (2013). Epidemiology (5th ed.). London, UK: Saunders.
Hill, A. B. (1965). The environment and disease: association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58(5), 295–300.
Jee, W. L. (2014). Lecture on civil law (12th ed.). Seoul: Hongmoonsa. (In Korean).
Jung, D. Y., & Yoo, B. H. (2014). Civil procedure law. Seoul: Pakyoungsa. (In Korean).
Lee, S. Y. (2015). New civil procedure law (10th ed.). Seoul, Korea: Pakyoungsa. (In Korean).
Lee, S. G. (2016). Proving causation with epidemiological evidence in tobacco lawsuits. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 49, 80–96.
Min, I. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2012). Annotated civil procedure law 1. Seoul: Korean Association for Public Administration and Justice. (in Korean).
Porta, M. S., Greenland, S., Hernán, M., Santos Silva, I. D., Last, J. M., & International Epidemiological Association. (2014). A dictionary of epidemiology. (6th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rothman, K. J., & Greenland, S. (2005). Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health, 95(Suppl. 1), S144–S150.
Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (Eds.). (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
US Surgeon General’s Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health. (1964). Smoking and health; report of the advisory committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service.
Yang, C. S., & Kwon, Y. J. (2012). Changes and protection of rights: civil law 2. Seoul: Pakyoungsa. (In Korean).
Yune, J. S. (2011). The main issues of the product liability. Yonsei Law Review, 21(3), 1–55. (In Korean).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jung, M. (2018). Introduction. In: An Investigation of the Causal Inference between Epidemiology and Jurisprudence. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7862-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7862-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7861-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7862-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)