Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Agent-Based Approaches in Economics and Social Complex Systems IX pp 109–121Cite as

Understanding the Learning Processes of Traveller Behavioural Choices Using Agent-Based Approach: A Conceptual Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

  • 706 Accesses

Part of the book series: Agent-Based Social Systems ((ABSS,volume 15))

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework of agent-based model to study the learning processes of traveller behavioural choices. Social interaction and social learning among travellers are taken into the model. The way an agent-based model can be combined with traffic microsimulation model is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdel-Aty, M., & Abdalla, F. (2006). Examination of multiple mode/route choice paradigms under ATIS. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7(3), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adler, J., & Blue, V. (2002). A cooperative multi-agent transportation management and route guidance system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10, 433–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arentze, T., & Timmermans, H. (2005). Modelling learning and adaptation in transportation context. Transportmetrica, 1(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balmer, M. (2007). Travel demand modeling for multi-agent traffic simulations: Algorithms and systems. Dissertation, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bazzan, A. L., & Klugl, F. (2005). Case studies on the Braess Paradox: Simulating route recommendation and learning in abstract and microscopic models. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 13, 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ben-Akiva, M., De Palma, A., & Kaysi, I. (1991). Dynamic network models and driver information system. Transportation Research Part A, 25, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boulter, P., & McCrae, I. (2007). Assessment and Reliability of Transport Emission Models and Inventory Systems – Final Report. ARTEMIS deliverable no. 15. Wokingham: TRL.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dia, H., & Panwai, S. (2007). Modelling drivers’ compliance and route choice behaviour in response to travel information. Nonlinear Dynamics, 49, 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dia, H. (2002). An agent-based approach to modelling driver route choice behaviour under the influence of real-time information. Transportation Research Part C, 10, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fried, M., Havens, J., & Thall, M. (1977). Travel behaviour: A synthesized theory (Laboratory of psychosocial studies) Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frith, B. (1999). The estimation of recurrent congestion and congestion due to roadworks and incidents: 1995/96 to 1998/99. Transport Research Laboratory Report, Crowthrone.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gärling, T., Karlsson, N., Romanus, J., & Selart, M. (1997). Influences of the past on choices of the future. In R. Ranyard, W. R. Crozier, & O. Svenson (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goodwin, P. (2004) The economic costs of road traffic congestion. Discussion paper published by Rail Freight Group. Available at: http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/1259/

  14. Goodwin, P. (2005). Utilities’ street works and the cost of traffic congestion. Report available at: http://www.njug.org.uk/publication/93

  15. Halcrow Group Ltd. (2004). Assessing the extent of street works and monitoring the effectiveness of section 74 in reducing disruption, 3rd annual report, volume 3 – Estimation of the cost of delay from utilities street works, September. London: Department for Transport.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Halle, S., & Chaib-draa, B. (2005). A collaborative driving system based on multiagent modeling and simulations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 13, 320–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernandez, J., Ossowski, S., & Garcia-Serrano, A. (2002). Multiagent architectures for intelligent traffic management systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10, 473–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurumatani, K. (2004). Mass user support by social coordination among citizens in a real environment. In K. Kurumatani, S. H. Chen, & A. Ohuchi (Eds.), Multi-agent for mass user support (pp. 1–17). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, R., Van Vliet, D., & Watling, D. (2006). Microsimulation models incorporating both demand and supply dynamics. Transportation Research Part A, 40, 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Logi, F., & Ritchie, S. (2002). A multi-agent architecture for cooperative inter-jurisdictional traffic congestion management. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10, 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lomuscio, A. (1999). Intelligent agents – Introduction. Crossroads, 5(4), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahmassani, H. S., & Jou, R. C. (2000). Transferring insights into commuter behaviour dynamics from laboratory experiments to field surveys. Transportation Research Part A, 34, 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McElreath, R., Lubell, M., Richerson, P. J., Waring, T. M., Baum, W., Edsten, E., Efferson, C., & Paciotti, B. (2005). Applying evolutionary models to the laboratory study of social learning. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 483–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Sullivan, D., & Haklay, M. (2000). Agent-based models and individualism: Is the world agent-based? Environment & Planning A, 32, 1409–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Paez, A., & Scott, D. M. (2007). Social influence on travel behavior: A simulation example of decision to telecommute. Environment & Planning A, 39, 647–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Polydoropoulou, A., et al. (1996). Modeling revealed and stated en-route travel response to advanced traveler information systems. Transprotation Research Record, 1537, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosetti, R., & Liu, R. (2005). An agent-based approach to assess drivers' interaction with pre-trip information systems. Intelligent Transportation Systems, 9(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Srinivasan, K., & Mahmassani, H. S. (2000). Modelling inertia and compliance mechanisms in route choice behavior under real-time information. Transportation Research Record, 1725, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sunitiyoso, Y., Avineri, E., & Chatterjee, K. (2009). Complexity and travel behaviour: A multi-agent simulation for investigating the influence of social aspects on travellers’ compliance with a demand management measure. In E. Silva, N. Karadimitriou, & G. de Roo (Eds.), A planners meeting with complexity. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Transport for London (2003). Micro-simulation modelling guidance note for TfL.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Van Katwijk, R., & Van Koningsbruggen, P. (2002). Coordination of traffic management instruments using agent technology. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10, 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wahle, J., Bazzan, A. L. C., Klugl, F., & Schreckenberg, M. (2002). The impact of real time information in a two-route scenario using agent-based simulation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 10, 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamashita, T., Kurumatani, K., Izumi, K., & Nakashima, H. (2005). Smooth traffic flow with a cooperative car navigation system. Paper presented in the 4th joint conference on autonomous agent and multi agent system, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Management, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia

    Yos Sunitiyoso

Authors
  1. Yos Sunitiyoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yos Sunitiyoso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

    Utomo Sarjono Putro

  2. National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan

    Manabu Ichikawa

  3. School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

    Manahan Siallagan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sunitiyoso, Y. (2017). Understanding the Learning Processes of Traveller Behavioural Choices Using Agent-Based Approach: A Conceptual Framework. In: Putro, U., Ichikawa, M., Siallagan, M. (eds) Agent-Based Approaches in Economics and Social Complex Systems IX. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 15. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3662-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation