Skip to main content

PBL Curriculum Strategies

From Course Based PBL to a Systemic PBL Approach

  • Chapter

Abstract

These words are formulated by Freire in Education for critical consciousness. We could formulate similar hypotheses: while all problem and project based learning (PBL) transitions involve change, not all PBL changes result in more comprehensive transition. If academic staff and students are not critically aware of the transition from a lecture-based curriculum to a problem and project based curriculum, contradictions increase between ways of knowing, acting and being in the traditional curriculum and an emerging curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABET. (1995). A vision for change: A summary of the ABET/NSF industry workshops. Baltimore, MD: ABET, Inc. Retrieved from http://bioinfo.uib.es/~joe/semdoc/PlansEstudis/ABET_Criteria_PTE/Vision.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 429–440. doi:10.1080/03075070902771978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2004). Engaging the curriculum in higher education (1st ed.). Maidenhead & New York, NY: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J., Henriksen, L. B., & Kolmos, A. (2006). Engineering science, skills and bildung. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J., Henriksen, L. B., Kolmos, A., & Christensen, J. (2006). Engineering science, skills, and bildung. In A. Kolmos & A. Kolmos (Eds.), Engineering science, skills, and bildung (pp. 7–19). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • EURASHE. (2009). The Bologna process 2020 the European higher education area in the new decade. Brussels: European Association of Institutions in Higher Education (EURASHE). Retrieved from https://www.eurashe.eu/library/bologna_2009_leuven-communique-pdf/

  • Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). The CDIO approach: Rethinking engineering education (pp. 11–45). New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Graaf, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering (1st ed.). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorensen, C. D. (1997). A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, P. D., & Kezar, A. (2003). Key strategies for making new institutional sense: Ingredients to higher education transformation. Higher Education Policy, 16(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: Complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539–555. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.895703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission. (2008). Improving competences for the 21st century: An agenda for European cooperation on schools. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52008DC0425

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, A., Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2014). Hybrid learning: An integrative approach to engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 253–273. doi:10.1002/jee.20041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2013). Understanding sensemaking/sensegiving in transformational change processes from the bottom up. Higher Education, 65, 761–780. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9575-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmos, A. (1996). Reflections on project work and problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 141–148. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03043799608923397

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kolmos, A. (2017). PBL Curriculum Strategies. In: Guerra, A., Ulseth, R., Kolmos, A. (eds) PBL in Engineering Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-905-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-905-8_1

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-905-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics