Skip to main content

Students’ Learning Environment, Motivation and Self-Regulation

A Comparative Structural Equation Modeling Analysis

  • Chapter
Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research and Practice

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, research has consistently shown that the quality of the classroom environment is an important determinant of student learning (Fraser, 2007, 2012). That is, students are likely to learn better when they perceive their classroom environment positively. According to Hanrahan (2002), research on science pedagogy suggests that the dynamics of science classrooms can be influential in alienating students before they even to begin to engage with science concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Outcomes-focused learning environments: Determinants and effects. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, I. T. C. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research method. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Bell, L. M., & Dorman, J. (2012). Using a new learning environment questionnaire for reflection in teacher action research. Journal of Science Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and uses as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart, S. M., Walsh, J. M., & Zientarski, W. A. (2006). The dynamics of motivation and effort for classroom assessments in middle school science and social studies. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 151–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii-xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chionh, Y. H., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Classroom environment, achievement, attitudes and self-esteem in geography and mathematics in Singapore. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 18(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influences, and practices. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 229–254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosbie-Brunett, M., & Lewis, E. A. (1993). Theoretical contributions from social and cognitive behavioral psychology. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R Schumm, & S. K. Streinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 531–557). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Brok, P., Fisher, D., & Koul, R. (2005). The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for secondary science students' attitudes in Kashmir. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(2), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doljanac, R. F. (1994). Using motivational factors and learning strategies to predict academic success. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56 (01A), 0142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P. (2001). Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 4, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P. (2008). Use of multitrait-multimethod modelling to validate actual and preferred forms of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire. Learning Environments Research, 11, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. & Adams, J. (2004). Associations between students’ perceptions of classroom environment and academic efficacy in Australian and British secondary schools. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 27(1), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modelling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2001). Twenty thousand hours: Editors Introduction. Learning Environments Research, 4, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environments. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 103–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), The second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., Aldridge, J. M., & Adolphe, F. S. G. (2010). A cross-national study of secondary science classroom environments in Australia and Indonesia. Research in Science Education, 40, 551–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling techniques and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 7(7), 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G. & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1088–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, M. (2002, July). Learning science: Revisiting humanist dimensions of intellectual engagement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Townsville, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of Partial Least Square path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 330–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contribution and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour in secondary science classes in Korea. Evaluation Research in Education, 14(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, H. S., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Using classroom psychosocial environment in the evaluation of adult computer application courses in Singapore. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupermintz, H. (2002). Affective and cognitive factors as aptitude resources in high school science achievement. Educational Assessment, 8, 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyper, H., van der Werf, M. P. C., & Lubbers, M. J. (2000). Motivation, meta-cognition and self-regulation as predictors of long term educational attainment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S., & Roeser, R. W. (2002). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in high school students’ situational engagement and achievement in science. Educational Assessment, 8, 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. H. (1997). Goal orientation, goal setting, and achievement performance in college students: An integrated model of achievement motivation in school settings. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(06A), 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 585–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1936). Principals of topological psychology. New York: McGraw.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorsbach, A. W., & Jinks, J. L. (1999). Self-efficacy and learning environment research. Learning Environments Research, 2, 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Dunlop, C., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment and attitudes associated with an innovative course designed for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (2002). Beyond motivation: Middle school students’ perceptions of press for understanding in math. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1974). The social climate scales: An overview. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, J. D., & Riley, J. (1985). Relationship between affective determinants and achievement in science for seventeen-year olds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nix, R. K., Fraser, B. J., & Ledbetter, C. E. (2005). Evaluating an integrated science learning environment using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey. Learning Environments Research, 8, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbuehi, P. I., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Learning environment, attitudes and conceptual development associated with innovative strategies in middle-school mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 10, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2001). Toward a positive psychology of academic motivation. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41, 116–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Adolescence and education: Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., Britner, S.L., & Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and self beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 406–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficiency, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (pp. 117–160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Outsome, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santosa, P. I., Wei, K. K., & Chan, H. C. (2005). User involvement and user satisfaction with information-seeking activity. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, M. F. (2004). An interview with Anita Woolfolk: The educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veyalutham, S., Aldridge, J.M., & Fraser, B.J. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 5, 2159–2179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38, 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students’ motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 801–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., Afari, E. (2013). Students’ Learning Environment, Motivation and Self-Regulation. In: Khine, M.S. (eds) Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research and Practice. Contemporary Approaches to Research in Learning Innovations. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-332-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships