Abstract
Despite the important role certifiable management system standards (CMSS) play in our globalised economies, there still exists a gap in the literature regarding firms’ motives to implement these standards. This is mainly due to the fact that existing literature perceives certification as synonymous with implementation and does not take into account that quality of implementation, of CMSS among companies, varies. This chapter makes two important contributions. The first one is that it provides quantitative evidence to the relatively few studies that analyse quality of CMSS implementation. In doing so, this work advances our understanding of the factors that motivate firms to implement these standards. Most importantly, in contrast to previous studies that analyse drivers of average implementation of CMSS, this chapter also examines the motives related to low, medium and above average implementation of such standards. Using a novel dataset of 201, ISO 9001 certified firms, located in Greece, our analysis shows that sixty per cent of firms in the sample fail to conform to the requirements of the standard. In contrast to the dominant neo-institutional view in the analysis of CMSS, our econometric findings suggest that competitive motivations are the influential drivers in making companies fully commit to ISO 9001 (i.e. above average implementation).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Spence’s argument is that when there is asymmetric information, productive workers will attend a college for differentiating themselves from the non-productive, as long as the college diploma is perceived by stakeholders as a credible signal of good performance capabilities (1973).
- 2.
The Likert scale ranges from: 1 (not influence), 2 (little influence), 3 (some influence), 4 (influential), 5 (very influential).
- 3.
The Likert scale ranges from: 1 (never), 2 (seldom), 3 (sometimes), 4 (often), and 5 (always).
- 4.
Recent studies on ISO 14001 (Aravind and Christmann 2011) have reached the same conclusions.
References
Aravind D, Christmann P (2011) Decoupling of standard implementation from certification: Does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities’ environmental performance? Bus Ethics Q 21(1):73–102
Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ, Corbett CJ (2007) A spatiotemporal analysis of the global diffusion of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 certification. Manag Sci 53(3):451–468
Aulakh PS, Gençtürk FE (2008) Contract formalization and governance of exporter–importer relationships. J Manage Stud 45(3):457–479
Bartley T (2003) Certifying forests and factories: states, social movements and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields. Polit soc 31(3):433–464
Bansal P, Hunter T (2003) Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO14001. J Bus Ethics 46(3):289–299
Behnam M, MacLean T (2011) Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A Decoupling perspective. Bus Ethics Q 21(1):45–72
Biazzo S (2005) The new ISO 9001 and the problem of ceremonial conformity: How have audit methods evolved? Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 16(3):381–399
Boiral O (2003) The certification of corporate conduct: issues and prospects. Int Labour Rev 142(3):317–340
Boiral O (2007) Corporate greening through ISO14001: a rational myth? Organ Sci 18(1):127–162
Boiral O (2011) Managing with ISO systems: lessons from practice. Long Range Plan 44(3):197–220
Boiral O, Amara N (2009) Paradoxes of ISO 9000 performance: a configurational approach. Qual Manage J 16(3):36–60
Brown N, Deegan C (1998) The public disclosure of environmental performance information—A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Acc Bus Res Winter 21–41
BSI (2013) Health & safety OHSAS 18001. BSI, London
Campbell DT (1955) The informant in quantitative research. Am J Sociol 60(3):339–342
Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):946–967
Casadesus M, Karapetrovic S (2005) Has ISO9000 lost some of its lustre? A longitudinal impact study. Int J Oper Prod Manage 25(6):580–596
Christmann P, Taylor G (2006) Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. J Int Bus Stud 37(6):863–878
Corporate-Watch (2006) What’s wrong with corporate social responsibility?. Corporate-Watch, Oxford
Cragg W (2005) Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Deegan C, Rankin M (1996) Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the environmental protection authority. Acc Auditing Accountability J (2):50
Deephouse DL (1996) Does isomorphism legitimate? Acad Manag J 39(4):1024–1039
Delmas MA (2002) The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: an institutional perspective. Policy Sci 35(1): 91–119
Delmas M, Montiel I (2008) The diffusion of voluntary international management standards: responsible care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the chemical industry. Policy Stud J 36(1):65–93
Delmas MA, Toffel MW (2003) Institutional pressure and environmental management practices, 11th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network. San Francisco State University, San Francisco: University of Berkeley
De Pelsmacker P, Janssens W (2007) Model for fair trade buying behaviour: the role of perceived quantity and quality of information and of product-specific attitudes. J Bus Ethics 75(4):361–380
Deming EW (1982) Out of the crisis. MIT Center for Advanced Educational Services, Cambridge
Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
European Commission (2003) Mapping instruments for corporate social responsibility. European Commission, Luxembourg
European Commission (2012) Using standards to support growth, competitiveness and innovation. European Commission, Luxembourg
Glynn MA, Marquis C (2004) When good names go bad: Symbolic illegitimacy in organizations. In: Johnson C (ed) Legitimacy processes in organizations, Elsevier Ltd, Oxford-Greene, pp 147–170
Gondo M, Amis J (2013) Variations in practice adoption: the roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Acad Manage Rev 38(2):229–247
Goedhuys M, Sleuwaegen L (2013) The impact of international standards certification on the performance of firms in less developed countries. World Dev 47:87–101
Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis (5 ed). Prentice Hall, NJ
Heavey C, Simsek Z, Roche F, Kelly A (2009) Decision comprehensiveness and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating role of managerial uncertainty preferences and environmental dynamism. J Manage Stud 46(8):1289–1314
Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Arana G, Molina-Azorín JF (2011) Do drivers matter for the benefits of ISO 14001? Int J Oper Prod Manage 31(2):192–216
Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Boiral O (2013a) ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: towards a research agenda on management system standards. Int J Manage Rev 15(1):47–65
Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Boiral O (2013b) Symbolic adoption of ISO 9000 in small and medium-sized enterprises: the role of internal contingencies. Int Small Bus J 33(3):299–320
Hoffman AJ (2001) Linking organizational and field-level analyses: the diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organ Environ 14(2):133–156
Iatridis K, Kesidou E (2016) What drives substantive versus symbolic implementation of ISO 14001 in a time of economic crisis? Insights from Greek manufacturing companies. J Bus Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3019-8
Iatridis K, Kuznetsov A, Whyman PB (2016) SMEs and certified management standards: the effect of motives and timing on implementation and commitment. Bus Ethics Q 26(01):67–94
ISO (2009) Management standards. ISO Central Secretariat, Geneva
ISO (2012) The ISO survey. ISO Central Secretariat, Geneva
ISO (2013) Latest ISO survey confirms boost in management systems, vol 24 February 2014
ISO Focus (2014) Crackdown on counterfeiting. ISO Focus January–February, 11–15
Jamali D (2010) MNCs and international accountability standards through an institutional lens: evidence of symbolic conformity or decoupling. J Bus Ethics 95(4):617–640
Jiang RJ, Bansal P (2003) Seeing the need for ISO 14001. J Manage Stud 40(4):1047–1067
King AA, Lenox MJ (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad Manage J 43(4):698–716
King AA, Lenox MJ, Terlaak A (2005) The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad Manage J 48(6):1091–1106
Kollman K, Prakash A (2002) EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods: examining variations in firm-level adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in U.K., U.S. and Germany. Policy Sci 35(1):43–67
Kumar N, Stern LW, Anderson JC (1993) Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad Manage J 36(6):1633–1651
Lannelongue G, Gonzalez-Benito O, Gonzalez-Benito J (2013) Environmental motivations: the pathway to complete environmental management. J Bus Ethics 124(1):135–147
Lazzarini S, Claro D, Mesquita L (2008) Buyer-supplier and supplier-supplier alliances: Do they reinforce or undermine one another? J Manage Stud 45(3):561–584
Lee M-DP (2008) A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. Int J Manage Rev 10(1):53–73
Lenox MJ (2006) The role of private decentralized institutions in sustaining industry self-regulation. Organ Sci 17(6):677–690
Lindgreen A, Swaen V (2010) Corporate social responsibility. Int J Manage Rev 12(1):1–7
Long BS, Driscoll C (2008) Codes of ethics and the pursuit of organizational legitimacy: theoretical and empirical contributions. J Bus Ethics 77(2):173–189
Luo Y, Liu Y, Xue J (2009) Relationship investment and channel performance: an analysis of mediating forces. J Manage Stud 46(7):1113–1137
Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A (2006) Common method variance in is research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manag Sci 52(12):1865–1883
Martínez-Costa M, Choi TY, Martínez JA, Martínez-Lorente AR (2009) ISO 9000/1994, ISO 9001/2000 and TQM: the performance debate revisited. J Oper Manage 27(6):495–511
Morrison DF (1976) Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw Hill, New York
Mosakowski E (1998) Managerial prescriptions under the resource-based view of strategy: the example of motivational technique. Strateg Manage J 9(12):1169–1182
Nair A, Prajogo D (2009) Internalisation of ISO 9000 standards: the antecedent role of functionalist and institutionalist drivers and performance implications. Int J Prod Res 47:4545–4568
Naveh E, Marcus AA (2004) When does the ISO 9000 quality assurance standard lead to performance improvement? Assimilation and going beyond. IEEE Trans Eng Manage Sci 51(3):352–363
Neumayer E, Perkins R (2005) Uneven geographies of organizational practice: explaining the cross-national transfer and diffusion of ISO 9000. Econ Geogr 81(3):237–259
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psycometric theory. 2nd edn.McGraw-Hill, New York
OECD (2009) Annual report on the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises 2008. Employment and industrial relations. OECD Publishing, Paris
Oliver C (1997) Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views. Strateg Manage J 18(9):697–713
Oskarsson K, von Malmborg F (2005) Integrated management systems as a corporate response to sustainable development. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 12:121–128
Pérez-Nordtvedt L, Kedia B, Datta D, Rasheed A (2008) Effectiveness and efficiency of cross-border knowledge transfer: an empirical examination. J Manage Stud 45(4):714–744
Rasche A (2009) Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards: the case of the UN Global Compact. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 16(4):192–205
Salomone R (2008) Integrated management systems: experiences in Italian organizations. J Clean Prod 16:1786–1806
Tencati A, Russo A, Quaglia V (2008) Unintended consequences of CSR: protectionism and collateral damage in global supply chains: the case of Vietnam. Corp Gov 8(4):518–531
Terlaak A (2007) Satisfying signaling: corporate social strategy and certified management standards, academy of management 2007 annual meeting 1–6. Academy of Management, Philadelphia
Terlaak A, King A (2006) The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 quality management standard: a signaling approach. J Econ Behav Organ 60(4):579–602
Yin H, Schmeidler PJ (2009) Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Bus Strategy Environ 18(7):469–486
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iatridis, K., Kesidou, E. (2018). What Drives the Quality of Certifiable Management System Standards Implementation? Insights from the ISO 9001 Standard. In: Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (eds) ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and New Management Standards. Measuring Operations Performance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65675-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65675-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65674-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65675-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)