Skip to main content

Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Analysis of the Role of Craniovertebral and Spinal Instability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 125))

Abstract

Background: This paper reviews an experience of surgically treating ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) with fixation of the involved spinal segments alone, without resorting to any bony or soft tissue decompression or attempts at direct resection of the OPLL. While in the early part of the experience, stabilization of only the involved subaxial cervical spinal segments was done, in the later part of the experience, atlantoaxial fixation was included in the multisegmental spinal fixation construct. This treatment is based on the understanding that spinal instability that includes atlantoaxial instability forms the nodal point of the pathogenesis and development of OPLL, and maturation of the presenting clinical symptoms.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine patients were treated in this series. There were 28 males and one female, and their ages ranged from 28 to 75 years (average 57 years). All patients presented with symptoms of neck pain, and progressive and disabling myelopathy-related quadriparesis. In the early part of the series (from 2012 to 2014), 14 patients underwent multilevel subaxial cervical spinal fixation by a transarticular technique of facetal fixation. After November 2014, atlantoaxial lateral mass fixation was included in the fixation construct in the subsequent 15 patients. Clinical assessments were done using a visual analogue scale (VAS), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale and Goel’s clinical grading scale.

Results: All patients’ clinical symptoms improved in the immediate postoperative period, and the improvement was sustained and progressive in 28 patients.

Conclusion: Atlantoaxial and subaxial spinal instability seems to be the nodal pathogenetic factor in OPLL. Only stabilization of spinal segments that includes the atlantoaxial joint can provide a safe, simple and rational form of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Epstein N. Ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2002;13(2):ECP1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Kawabe J, Hayashi K, Endo T, et al. Static versus dynamic factors for the development of myelopathy in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17:320–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Inamasu J, Guiot BH, Sachs DC. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: an update on its biology, epidemiology, and natural history. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:1027–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobashi G, Washio M, Okamoto K, Sasaki S, Yokoyama T, Miyake Y, et al. High body mass index after age 20 and diabetes mellitus are independent risk factors for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine in Japanese subjects: a case–control study in multiple hospitals. Spine. 2004;29:1006–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsunaga S, Sakou T. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: etiology and natural history. Spine. 2012;37(5):E309–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsunaga S, Yamaguchi M, Hayashi K, Sakou T. Genetic analysis of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 1999;24:937–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsunaga S, Kukita M, Hayashi K, Shinkura R, Koriyama C, Sakou T, et al. Pathogenesis of myelopathy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(2 Suppl):168–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramos-Remus C, Russell AS, Gomez-Vargas AS, Hernandez-Chavez A, Maksymowych WP, Gamez-Nava JI, et al. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in three geographically and genetically different populations of ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthropathies. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57:429–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakou T, Taketomi E, Matsunaga S, Yamaguchi M, Sonoda S, Yashiki S. Genetic study of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine with human leukocyte antigen haplotype. Spine. 1991;16:1249–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Song J, Mizuno J, Hashizume Y, Nakagawa H. Immunohistochemistry of symptomatic hypertrophy of the posterior longitudinal ligament with special reference to ligamentous ossification. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:576–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goel A. Is atlantoaxial instability the cause of “high” cervical ossified posterior longitudinal ligament? Analysis on the basis of surgical treatment of seven patients. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2016;7(1):20–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goel A, Nadkarni T, Shah A, Rai S, Rangarajan V, Kulkarni A. Is only stabilization the ideal treatment for ossified posterior longitudinal ligament? Report of early results with a preliminary experience in 14 patients. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(3):813–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Kitagawa T, Tamai K, Saotome K. Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36. Spine. 2003;28:1601–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. J Rheumatol. 1982;9:768–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goel A. Goel’s classification of atlantoaxial “facetal” dislocation. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2014;5(1):3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G. Surgery of the cervical spine. 2. Dislocation. Fracture of the articular processes. J Nouv Presse Med. 1972;1:2484–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goel A, Bhatjiwale M, Desai K. Basilar invagination: a study based on 190 surgically treated cases. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:962–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goel A, Desai K, Muzumdar D. Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:1351–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goel A, Laheri VK. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial dislocation. (Technical report). Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;129:47–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goel A. Alternative technique of cervical spinal stabilization employing lateral mass plate and screw and intraarticular spacer fixation. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2013;4(2):56–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugrue PA, McClendon J Jr, Halpin RJ, Liu JC, Koski TR, Ganju A. Surgical management of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: natural history and the role of surgical decompression and stabilization. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;30:E3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiba K, Kato Y, Tsuzuki N, Nagata K, Toyama Y, Iwasaki M, et al. Computer-assisted measurement of the size of ossification in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:451–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Taketomi E, Komiya S. Clinical course of patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a minimum 10-year cohort study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;100(3 Suppl):245–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Resnick D, Guerra J Jr, Robinson CA, Vint VC. Association of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and calcification and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;131:1049–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Abe H, Tsuru M, Ito T, Iwasaki Y, Koiwa M. Anterior decompression for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg. 1981;55:108–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Belanger TA, Roh JS, Hanks SE, Kang JD, Emery SE, Bohlman HH. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Results of anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis in sixty-one North American patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:610–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cho WS, Chung CK, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Post-laminectomy kyphosis in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: does it cause neurological deterioration? J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008;43:259–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Epstein NE. Circumferential surgery for the management of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:200–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Goel A, Pareikh S. Limited oblique corpectomy for treatment of ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurol India. 2005;53(3):280–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K. Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(2 Suppl):180–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part 2: advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty. Spine. 2007;32:654–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaiser MG, Mummaneni PV, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Heary RF, et al. Radiographic assessment of cervical subaxial fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11:221–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kato Y, Iwasaki M, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Ochi T. Long-term follow-up results of laminectomy for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:217–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Matsuoka T, Yamaura I, Kurosa Y, Nakai O, Shindo S, Shinomiya K. Long-term results of the anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 2001;26:241–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mizuno J, Nakagawa H. Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament: management strategies and outcomes. Spine J. 2006;6(6 Suppl):282S–8S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B. Cervical disc lesions. J Am Med Assoc. 1958;166:23–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Onari K, Akiyama N, Kondo S, Toguchi A, Mihara H, Tsuchiya T. Long-term follow-up results of anterior interbody fusion applied for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:488–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Joseph V, Kumar GS, Rajshekhar V. Cerebrospinal fluid leak during cervical corpectomy for ossified posterior longitudinal ligament: incidence, management, and outcome. Spine. 2009;34:491–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Houten JK, Cooper PR. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:1081–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Goel A. Facet distraction spacers for treatment of degenerative disease of the spine: rationale and an alternative hypothesis of spinal degeneration. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2010;1(2):65–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Goel A. Facet distraction–arthrodesis technique: can it revolutionize spinal stabilization methods? J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011;2(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goel A. ‘Only fixation’ as rationale treatment for spinal canal stenosis. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011;2(2):55–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Goel A. Is it necessary to resect osteophytes in degenerative spondylotic myelopathy? J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2013;4(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Goel A. Letter to Editor: resolution of cystic deterioration of the C1–2 articulation with posterior fusion: treatment implications for asymptomatic patients. Puffer RC, Van Gompel JJ, Morris JM, Krauss WE. World Neurosurg. 2013;79(5–6):773–8.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Goel A, Shah A. Facetal distraction as treatment for single- and multilevel cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(6):689–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Goel A, Shah A, Jadhav M, Nama S. Distraction of facets with intraarticular spacers as treatment for lumbar canal stenosis: report on a preliminary experience with 21 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(6):672–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Goel A. Chiari malformation—is atlantoaxial instability the cause? Outcome analysis of 65 patients with Chiari malformation treated by atlantoaxial fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22(2):116–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Goel A. Treatment of basilar invagination by atlantoaxial joint distraction and direct lateral mass fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(3):281–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Goel A. Retro-odontoid mass: an evidence of craniovertebral instability. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2015;6(1):6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Goel, A. (2019). Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Analysis of the Role of Craniovertebral and Spinal Instability. In: Visocchi, M. (eds) New Trends in Craniovertebral Junction Surgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 125. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62514-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62515-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics