Abstract
Increases in funding for and attention to after-school programs have led to greater scrutiny over both the quality and effectiveness of this programming, putting pressure on programs to measure both setting-level characteristics and the impact of involvement on participants. Yet research on the outcomes of after-school participation has been mixed. One reason for the mixed finding is that the effects of after-school participation vary by type of program, quality of programming, and length of youths’ involvement. Better measurement can help determine which types of programs are most effective and how often young people need to attend to see these benefits. First, we focus on the Quality, Engagement, Skills, Transfer (QuEST) model, and outline measurement issues for three components of this model, quality, engagement, and social and emotional skills. Next, a case study of an evaluation of the program Girls on the Run is presented. The chapter concludes with a discussion of measurement challenges and recommendations for policy makers and practitioners. Recommendations include: (1) using logic models to define the goals of the program and to help identify appropriate outcomes, (2) incorporating measures of youth participation and engagement into evaluations to better understand the impact of after-school programs, (3) evaluating the technical quality of available measures and selecting measures that are appropriate to the study goals, and (4) considering the organization’s capacity for evaluation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., Eccles, J. S., & Smith, C. (2013). Youth belonging and cognitive engagement in organized activities: A large-scale field study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 208–218. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.05.001
Akiva, T., Smith, C., Sugar, S., & Brummet, Q. (2011). Staff instructional practices, youth engagement, and belonging in out-of-school time programs. New Orleans: Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
Arbreton, A., Goldsmith, J., & Sheldon, J. (2005). Launching literacy in after-school programs: Early lessons from the CORAL initiative. Philadelphia, PA: Public/ Private Ventures.
Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 74(3), 769–782. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00567
Bandy, T., Burkauser, M. A., & Metz, A. J. (2009). Data-driven decision making in out-of-school time programs. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
Bartko, W. T. (2005). The abcs of engagement in out-of-school-time programs. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005(105), 109–120. doi:10.1002/yd.110
Blazevski, J., & Smith, C. (2007). After-school quality and school-day outcomes in Michigan’s 21st cclc program. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80(4), 576–610. doi:10.3102/0034654310364533
Borden, L. M., Perkins, D. F., Villarruel, F. A., & Stone, M. R. (2005). To participate or not to participate: That is the question. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005(105), 33–49. doi:10.1002/yd.106
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Youth risk behavior survey. Available at: www.cdc.gov/yrbs Accessed on May 4, 2016.
DeBate, R. D. (2002). Girls on the run international evaluation report, spring 2002. Charlotte, NC: University of North Carolina.
DeBate, R. D., Gabriel, P. K., Zwald, M., Huberty, J., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Changes in psychosocial factors and physical activity frequency among third- to eighth-grade girls who participated in a developmentally focused youth sport program: A preliminary study. Journal of School Health, 79(10), 474–484. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00437.x
Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 294–309. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6
Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ehrlich, V. A. F., Bright, J., DeBate, R., Freeman, C., Harris, B. J., Hirsch, P., et al. (2017). Universal Cchallenges, specific contexts: Insights from looking within and across different after-school settings. In N. L. Deutsch (Ed.), After-school programs to promote positive youth development (Vol. 2): Learning from specific models. SpringerBriefs in Psychology: Springer International Publishing.
Fiester, L. M., Simpkins, S. D., & Bouffard, S. M. (2005). Present and accounted for: Measuring attendance in out-of-school-time programs. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005(105), 91–107. doi:10.1002/yd.109
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagment: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., Bohnert, J. A., & Burdette, K. (2014). Moving beyond attendance: Lessons learned from assessing engagement in after-school contexts. In J. Mahoney & G. Warner (Eds.), A practical guide to bridging science and practice in after-school programming: Learning from multiple successful programs around the nation. New Direction for Youth Development (Vol. 44 pp. 45–58).
Fry, M. D., & Gano-Overway, L. A. (2010). Exploring the contribution of the caring climate to the youth sport experience. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22(3), 294–304.
Forum for Youth Investment. (2012). Youth program quality assessment. Ypsilanti, MI: David P. Weikart Center for Youth Program Quality.
Gabriel, K. K. P., DeBate, R. D., High, R. R., & Racine, E. F. (2011). Girls on the run: A quasi-experimental evaluation of a developmentally focused youth sport program. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 8(2), S285–S294.
Granger, R. (2008). After-school programs and academics: Implications for policy, practice, and research. SRCD: Social Policy Report (Vol. 22, No. 2.).
Granger, R., Durlak, J. A., Yohalem, N., & Reisner, E. (2007). Improving after-school program quality. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.
Greene, K. M., Lee, B., Constance, N., & Hynes, K. (2012). Examining youth and program predictors of engagement in out-of-school time programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9814-3
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 85(2), 348–362. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
Hall, G., Fay Poston, K., & Dennehy, 2017. Summer Learning Programs: Investigating strengths and challenges. In N.L. Deutsch (Ed.), After-School Programs and Youth Development (Vol. 2): Learning from Specific Models. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Spring International Publishing.
Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F. (2014). Evidence for general and domain-specific elements of teacher–child interactions: Associations with preschool children’s development. Child Development, 85(3), 1257–1274. doi:10.1111/cdev.12184
Hansen, D. M., Larson, R., & Dworkin, J. B. (2003). What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 25–55. doi:10.1111/1532-7795.1301006
Harms, T., Jacobs, E. V., & White, D. R. (1995). School aged environment ratings scale. Teacher College Press.
Harris, E. (2011). After school evaluation: How to evaluation an expanding learning program. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
Harter, S. (1985). Self-perception profile for children. In R. M. Sabatelli, S. A. Anderson, & V. A. LaMotte (Eds.), Assessing outcomes in child and youth programs: A practical handbook. University Park: University of Denver.
Jones, S., & Bouffard, S. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools: From programs to strategies. SRCD: Social Policy Report (Vol. 26).
Kane, T. J. (2004). The impact of after-school programs: Interpreting the results of four recent evaluations. New York: NY: William T. Grant Foundation.
Larson, R., & Angus, R. M. (2011). Adolescents’ development of skills for agency in youth programs: Learning to think strategically. Child Development, 82, 277–294. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01555.x
Larson, R., Rickman, A. N., Gibbons, C. M., & Walker, K. C. (2009). Practitioner expertise: Creating quality within the dailiy tumble of events in youth settings. New Directions for Youth Development, 121, 71–88. doi:10.1002/yd.297
Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-school time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 275–313. doi:10.3102/00346543076002275
Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2006). Toward a new vision and vocabulary about adolescence: Theoretical, empirical, and applied bases of a “positive youth development” perspective. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 445–469). NY: Psychology Press.
Lippman, L. H., Moore, K. A., Guzman, L., Ryberg, R., McIntosh, H., Ramos, M. F.,. . . Kuhfeld, M. (2014). Flourishing children: Defining and testing indicators of positive development. New York, NY: Springer
Lippman, L. H., Ryberg, R., Terzian, M., Moore, K. A., Humble, J., & McIntosh, H. (2014b). Positive and protective factors in adolescent well-being. In A. Ben- Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frones, J.E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being (pp. 2823–2866). New York, NY: Springer.
Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Lord, H. (2005). Organized activities as developmental contexts for children and adolescents. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mahoney, J. L., Parente, M. E., & Lord, H. (2007). After-school program engagement: Links to child competence and program quality and content. The Elementary School Journal, 107(4), 385–404. doi:10.1086/516670
McGuire, J. K., & Gamble, W. C. (2006). Community service for youth: The value of psychological engagement over number of hours spent. Journal of Adolescence, 29(2), 289–298. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.07.006
Naftzger, N. (2014). A summary of three studies exploring the relationship between after-school program quality and youth outcomes. Paper presented at the Ready by 21 National Meeting, Covington, KY.
Naftzger, N., Devaney, E., & Foley, K. (2014a). Summary of analyses relate to nashville after zone alliance program outcomes. Naperville, IL: American Institutes for Research.
Naftzger, N., Hallberg, K., & Tang, Y. (2014b). Exploring the relationships between after-school program quality and youth outcomes: Summary of findings from the Palm Beach County quality improvement system. Naperville, IL: American Institutes for Research.
Naftzger, N., Nistler, M., Manzeske, D., Swanlund, A., Shields, J., Rapaport, A., et al. (2013). Texas 21st century community learning centers: Year two evaluation report. Naperville, IL: American Institutes for Research.
Pellegrino, J. W. E., & Hilton, M. L. E. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Roth, J. L., Malone, L. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2010). Does the amount of participation in after-school programs relate to developmental outcomes? A review of the literature. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3), 310–324. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9303-3
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063
Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., et al. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167–177. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00001-4
Shernoff, D., & Vandell, D. (2010). Engagement in after-school programs as a predictor of social competence and academic performance. American Journal Community Psychology, 45, 325–337. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9314-0
Shernoff, D. J., & Vandell, D. L. (2007). Engagement in after-school program activities: Quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(7), 891–903. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9183-5
Smith, C. (2014). Foreward. In A. Wilson-Ahlstrom, N. Yohalem, D. Dubois, P. Ji, & B. Hillaker (Eds.), From soft skills to hard data: Measuring youth program outcomes. Washington, D.C: The Forum for Youth Investment.
Smith, C., Akiva, T., McGovern, G., & Peck, S. (2014). After-school quality. New Directions for Youth Development, 144, 31–44.
Smith, C., Hallman, S., Hillaker, B., Sugar, S., McGovern, G., & Devaney, E. (2012). Development and early validation evidence for an observational measure of high quality instructional practice for science, technology, engineering and mathematics in out-of-school time settings: The stem supplement to the youth program quality assessment (pp. 1–25). Ypsilanti, MI: The David P. Weikart Center for Youth Program Quality.
Vandell, D. L., Reisner, E. R., Brown, B. B., Pierce, K., Dadisman, K., & Pechman, E. M. (2004). The study of promising after-school programs: Descriptive report of promising programs. Report to the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.
Weiss, M. R., & Wiese-Bjornstal, D. M. (2009). Promoting positive youth development through physical activity. President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports Research Digest, Series, 10(3), 1–8.
Weiss, H. B., Little, P. M. D., & Bouffard, S. M. (2005). More than just being there: Balancing the participation equation. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005(105), 15–31. doi:10.1002/yd.105
Wilson-Ahlstrom, A., Yohalem, N., DuBois, D., Ji, P., & Hillaker, B. (2014). From soft skills to hard data: Measuring youth program outcomes. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment.
Wood, D., Larson, R., & Brown, J. R. (2009). How adolescents come to see themselves as more responsible through participation in youth programs. Child Development, 50(1), 295–309. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01260.x
Yohalem, N., Wilson-Ahlstrom, A., Fischer, S., & Shinn, M. (2009). Measuring youth program quality: A guide to assessment tool (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment.
Zins, J. E. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say?. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fredricks, J.A., Naftzger, N., Smith, C., Riley, A. (2017). Measuring Youth Participation, Program Quality, and Social and Emotional Skills in After-School Programs. In: Deutsch, N. (eds) After-School Programs to Promote Positive Youth Development. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59132-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59132-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59131-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59132-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)