Abstract
Certain data processing activities open up new and attractive business models to companies. This chapter gives a cursory overview on the key issues for three special data processing activities with high practical relevance: first, big data techniques that allow to process vast quantities of data and, based on the comprehensive data sets that are being used, will often fall within the scope of application of the GDPR; second, cloud computing services that are usually involving the cloud service providers as processors; and third, the Internet of Things that links everyday items to services based on data analysis that will often affect the data subject’s personal privacy and, thus, consist of high-risk processing activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Keppeler/MMR 2015, 779, 779.
- 3.
Sydow/Kring, ZD 2014, 271, 276.
- 4.
Härting, ITRB 2016, 209, 209.
- 5.
European Data Protection Supervisor, Opinion 8/2016 (2016), p. 6.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Härting, ITRB 2016, 209, 210.
- 9.
- 10.
Werkmeister/Brandt, CR 2016, 233, 234.
- 11.
Koch, ITRB 2015, 13, 18.
- 12.
- 13.
Werkmeister/Brandt, CR 2016, 233, 235.
- 14.
Werkmeister/Brandt, CR 2016, 233, 235.
- 15.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 221 (2014), p. 2.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
Weichert, ZD 2013, 251, 256.
- 19.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 196 (2012), p. 4.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
Hofmann, ZD-Aktuell 2017, 05488.
- 24.
Hofmann, ZD-Aktuell 2017, 05488.
- 25.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 196 (2012), p. 8.
- 26.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 196 (2012), p. 8.
- 27.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 196 (2012), p. 5.
- 28.
Spies, in: v.d.Bussche/Voigt, Konzerndatenschutz, Cloud Computing (2014), rec. 53.
- 29.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 196 (2012), p. 9.
- 30.
Schmid/Kahl, ZD 2017, 54, 56.
- 31.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 223 (2014), p. 4.
- 32.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 223 (2014), p. 4.
- 33.
Dienst/Falke, in: Bräutigam/Rücker, E-Commerce, Internet der Dinge (2017), recs. 33–34.
- 34.
- 35.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 223 (2014), p. 15.
- 36.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 223 (2014), p. 15.
- 37.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 223 (2014), p. 7.
- 38.
Dienst/Falke, in: Bräutigam/Rücker, E-Commerce, Internet der Dinge (2017), rec. 38.
- 39.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 223 (2014), p. 7.
- 40.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 223 (2014), p. 8.
- 41.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 223 (2014), p. 8.
- 42.
Dienst/Falke, in: Bräutigam/Rücker, E-Commerce, Internet der Dinge (2017), rec. 58.
- 43.
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 223 (2014), p. 22.
- 44.
Dienst/Falke, in: Bräutigam/Rücker, E-Commerce, Internet der Dinge (2017), rec. 60.
References
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party (2012) Opinion 5/2012 on Cloud Computing, WP 196
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party (2013) Opinion 3/2013 on purpose limitation, WP 203
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party (2014) Statement on statement of the WP29 on the impact of the development of big data on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data in the EU, WP 221
Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party (2014) Opinion 8/2014 on the Recent Developments on the Internet of Things, WP 223
Dammann U (2016) Erfolge und Defizite der EU-Datenschutzgrundverordnung. ZD, pp 307–314
Dienst S, Falke M (2017) Datenschutzrechtliche Herausforderungen im Internet der Dinge. In: Bräutigam P, Rücker D (eds) E-Commerce Rechtshandbuch, 1st edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
European Data Protection Supervisor (2016) Opinion 8/2016 – EDPS opinion on coherent enforcement of fundamental rights in the age of big data
Härting N (2016) Big Data und Profiling nach der DSGVO. ITRB, pp 209–211
Hofmann J (2017) Anforderungen aus DS-GVO und NIS-RL an das Cloud Computing, ZD-Aktuell, 05488
Keppeler LM (2015) Was bleibt vom TMG-Datenschutz nach der DS-GVO? MMR, pp 779–783
Koch FA (2015) Big Data und der Schutz der Daten. ITRB, pp 13–20
Liedke B (2014) BIG DATA – small information: muss der datenschutzrechtliche Auskunftsanspruch reformiert werden? K&R, pp 709–714
Nebel M, Richter P (2012) Datenschutz bei Internetdiensten nach der DS-GVO. ZD, pp 407–413
Ringeling C (2015) A practical approach to business analytics software. Cri, pp 7–11
Roßnagel A (2013) Big data – small privacy? ZD, pp 562–567
Roßnagel A, Richter P, Nebel M (2013) Besserer Internetdatenschutz für Europa. ZD, pp 103–108
Schmid G, Kahl T (2017) Verarbeitung ‘sensibler’ Daten durch Cloud-Anbieter in Drittstaaten. ZD, pp 54–57
Spies A (2014) Cloud Computing. In: von dem Bussche AF, Voigt P (eds) Konzerndatenschutz Rechtshandbuch, 1st edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Sydow G, Kring M (2014) Die Datenschutzgrundverordnung zwischen Technikneutralität und Technikbezug. ZD, pp 271–276
Weichert T (2013) Big Data und Datenschutz. ZD, pp 251–259
Werkmeister C, Brandt E (2016) Datenschutzrechtliche Herausforderungen für Big Data. CR, pp 233–238
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Voigt, P., von dem Bussche, A. (2017). Special Data Processing Activities. In: The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57958-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57959-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)