Skip to main content

Shipping Liner Company Stowage Plans: An Optimization Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advanced Concepts, Methodologies and Technologies for Transportation and Logistics (EURO 2016, EWGT 2016)

Abstract

The problem of determining the stowage plan for each port included in the circular route of a containership is the planning problem daily faced by the shipping line coordinator (SC). The SC has to determine how to stow in each port a given set of containers into bay locations, either on the deck or in the hold, in order to satisfy some structural and operational constraints, all the transport demand and minimize the ship berthing time. The time spent by the ship at the ports is minimized when the SC defines a stowage plan that avoids re-handles, balances the workload of the cranes working in parallel at each port and requires to open and close hatches the least possible when moving containers in the holds. We propose a new MIP formulation, and a MIP heuristics for finding stowage plans for containerships up to 18000 TEUs. Moreover, the new formulation includes new and more accurate stability conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ambrosino, D., Anghinolfi, D., Paolucci, M., Sciomachen, A.: A new three-step heuristic for the master bay plan problem. Marit. Econ. Logistics (MEL) 11(1), 98–120 (2009). Special issue on “OR models in Maritime Transport and Freight Logistics”

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ambrosino, D., Paolucci, M., Sciomachen, A.: A MIP heuristic for the multi-port stowage planning. Transp. Res. Procedia 10, 725–734 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ambrosino, D., Paolucci, M., Sciomachen, A.: Computational evaluation of a MIP model for multi-port stowage planning problems. Soft. Comput. 21, 1753–1763 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Delgado-Ortegon, A.: Models and Algorithms for Container Vessel Stowage Optimization. Ph. D. thesis, IT-Universitetet i København, ITU-DS, no. 99 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Imai, A., Nishimura, E., Papadimitriou, S.: Marine container terminal configurations for efficient handling of mega-containerships. Transp. Res. Part E 49(1), 141–158 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meng, Q., Wang, S., Andersson, H., Thun, K.: Containership routing and scheduling in liner shipping: overview and future research directions. Transp. Sci. 48(2), 265–280 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monaco, M.F., Sammarra, M., Sorrentino, G.: The terminal oriented ship stowage planning problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239, 256–265 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Mulder, J., Dekker, R.: Optimization in container liner shipping. Econometric Institute Research Papers No. EI2016-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pacino, D., Delgado, A., Jensen, R.M., Bebbington, T.: Fast generation of near-optimal plans for eco-efficient stowage of large container vessels. In: Böse, J.W., Hu, H., Jahn, C., Shi, X., Stahlbock, R., Voß, S. (eds.) ICCL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6971, pp. 286–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24264-9_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Pacino, D., Delgado, A., Jensen, R.M., Bebbington, T.: An accurate model for seaworthy container vessel stowage planning with ballast tanks. In: Hu, H., Shi, X., Stahlbock, R., Voß, S. (eds.) ICCL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7555, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33587-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Pochet, Y., Wolsey, L.A.: Production Planning by Mixed Integer Programming. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Rashidi, H., Tsang, E.P.K.: Novel constraints satisfaction models for optimization problems in container terminals. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 3601–3634 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodrigue, J.P., Claude, C., Slack, B.: The geography of transport systems, 3rd edn. Routledge, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stahlbock, R., Voss, S.: Operations research at container terminal: a literature update. OR Spectr. 30, 1–52 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Steenken, D., Voss, S., Stahlbock, R.: Container terminal operation and operations research - a classification and literature review. OR Spectr. 26, 3–49 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Talley, W.K., Ng, M.: Maritime transport chain choice by carriers, ports and shippers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 142, 311–316 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tierney, K., Pacino, D., Jensen, R.M.: On the complexity of container stowage planning problems. Discrete Appl. Math. 169, 225–230 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. UNCTAD. Review of maritime transport, 2014. United Nations Conference on trade and Development (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Volkan, Ç.: Sustainable container terminal operations: challenges and enhancements. Karadeniz Araştırmaları, J. Black Sea Stud. 49, 141–156 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson, I.D., Roach, P.A.: Container stowage planning: a methodology for generating computerised solutions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51(11), 1248–1255 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson, D., Roach, P.A., Ware, J.A.: Container stowage pre-planning: using search to generate solutions, a case study. Knowl. Based Syst. 14(3–4), 137–145 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Paola Gualeni and Prof. Massimo Figari of the Electrical, Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering and Naval Architecture Department (DITEN) of the University of Genova, Italy, for the support given in the definition of the stability ship constraints.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Ambrosino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ambrosino, D., Paolucci, M., Sciomachen, A. (2018). Shipping Liner Company Stowage Plans: An Optimization Approach. In: Żak, J., Hadas, Y., Rossi, R. (eds) Advanced Concepts, Methodologies and Technologies for Transportation and Logistics. EURO EWGT 2016 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 572. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57105-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57105-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57104-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57105-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics