Skip to main content

Feasibility and Challenges on a National Qualifications Framework and Permeability in Education and Training System in Japan

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Comparative Studies on Community Colleges and Global Counterparts

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

A National Qualifications framework (NQF) is an important policy tool needed to achieve higher levels of transparency and permeability between academic and vocational pillars in education and training system. The NQF helps to guarantee the quality of education and training programs based on learning outcomes approaches. In this chapter, the feasibility and challenges of a NQF in Japan is explored based on the comparisons of NQF development in Anglophone countries as early starters of domestic interests, in second generation of Continental European countries that required international currency with European Qualifications Framework (EQF), and in East Asian countries with culturally unique traditions. The following elements related to NQF are considered: the societal contexts, the policy development, and the future challenges. The level descriptors have become more common in many NQFs as influenced by EQF approaches, covering both vocational and academic tracks vertically and horizontally. Thus, the NQF approach may have a powerful influence toward a globalization of education and training. It is questioned what are the current challenges and how countries are reforming the education and training system. In Japan, at the initial education phase, there are diversified qualifications and sectors in tertiary education system. As like the other East Asian countries, under the “academic credentialism,” education programs tend to be more diversified and hierarchically recognized, rather than transparent with certain standardization. At the further training phase, labor policies have been stimulating a shift from firm-specific certifications to those more standardized by industries. The further challenge is how to tune such the occupational certifications toward education and training programs by the field of industries and by the field of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allais, Stephanie, David Raffe, Rob Strathdee, Leesa Wheelahan and Michael Young. 2009. Learning from the first qualifications. Employment working paper no. 45. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcm_041902.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • Bateman, Andrea. 2016. Qualifications framework: National and regional with a focus on Australia and ASEAN. In Dual-track development of tertiary education and relevance of national qualifications frameworks, Report on global consortium for the development of core specialist human resources (EQGC report series) no. 12, ed. Keiichi Yoshimoto, 137–145. Fukuoka: Kyushu University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Phillip, and Hugh Lauder. 1991. Education, economy and social change. International Studies in Sociology of Education 1:1–2, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. 2016. Jissennteki kyaria senryaku; Kyaria dan-i seido (Career Grade System, under the Practical Career Support Policy measures). http://www5.cao.go.jp/keizai1/jissen-cu/jissen-cu.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2017. (in Japanese).

  • CEDEFOP. 2015. National qualifications frameworks development in Europe. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/4137_en.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • Doolette, Anne. 2014. Credibility of Australian qualifications framework. In Non-university higher education and qualifications framework – Report on the international workshop, EQ working paper series no.1, ed. Keiichi Yoshimoto, 90–99. Fukuoka: Kyushu University. (in English and Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, Ronald. 1976. The diploma disease. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel, Torsten and Isabelle le Mouillour. 2013. Berufsausbildung auf dem höchsten Niveau – europäische Erfahrungen (Vocational training on the highest level – European experiences). In Akademisierung der Berufswelt? (Academization of the world of occupations?), ed. Eckart Seveline and Ulrich Teichler, 143–167. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag. (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • ETF. 2013. Global national qualifications frameworks inventory. http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/publications/2211. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • Goda, Takafumi. 2014. Nihon no Seichou bunya niokeru chuukakuteki sennmon jinnzai yousei (Japanese vocational education of middle-level professionals in targeted growth fields). In Non-university higher education and qualifications framework – Report on the international workshop, EQ working paper series no.1, ed. Keiichi Yoshimoto, 45–49. Fukuoka: Kyushu University. (in English and Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, Julia, and Robert Wagenaar, eds. 2008. Tuning educational structures in Europe universities’ contribution to the Bologna Process: An introduction. 2nd ed. University of Deusto. Trans. Satoko Fukahori and Toru Takenaka. 2012. Tokyo: Akashi Shoten. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2007. An introductory guide to national qualifications frameworks: Conceptual and practical issues for policy makers. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@ifp_skills/documents/instructionalmaterial/wcms_103623.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • Japan Federation of Employers’ Associations. 1995. Shinjidai no Nihonnteki Keiei (The new age of Japanese management). Tokyo: Japan Federation of Employers’ Association. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Vocational Ability Development Association (JAVADA). 2016. Shokugyou nouryoku hyouka kijun (Vocational capability evaluation standard.) https://www.hyouka.javada.or.jp/. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • Koike, Kazuo. 1997. Human resource management. Tokyo: Japan Institute of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Mouillour, Isabelle. 2014. German qualification framework, a specific approach to permeability?. In Non-university higher education and qualifications framework – Report on the international workshop, EQ working paper series no.1, ed. Keiichi Yoshimoto, 107–117. Fukuoka: Kyushu University. (in English and Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Dong-Im. 2016. The NQF establishing progress and key issues in Korea. In Dual-track development of tertiary education and relevance of national qualifications frameworks, Report on global consortium for the development of core specialist human resources (EQGC report series) no. 12, ed. Keeichi Yoshimoto, 169–197. Fukuoka: Kyushu University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2014. Report on significance of vocational ability evaluation and policy directions for labour market policy. Tokyo: MHLW. (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2000. From initial education to working Life – making transitions work. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2004. The role of national qualifications systems in promoting lifelong learning. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2007. Qualifications systems: Bridges to lifelong learning. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quality and Qualifications Ireland. 2017. National framework for qualifications. http://www.qqi.ie/Articles/Pages/National-Framework-of-Qualifications-(NFQ).aspx. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • Raffe, David. 2013. What is the evidence for the impact of national qualifications frameworks? Comparative Education 49 (2): 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffe, David. 2014. Introducing a national qualifications framework: Concepts and issues arising from the international experience. In Higher education and qualifications framework – Report on the international workshop, EQ working paper series no.1, ed. Keiichi Yoshimoto, 73–79. Fukuoka: Kyushu University. (in English and Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffe, David, Karen Brannen, Linda Croxford, and Chris Martin. 1999. Comparing England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland: The case for ‘home internationals’ in comparative research. Comparative Education 35 (1): 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serban, Madlen. 2012. Qualifications frameworks: Possible tools for (vocational) education and training reforms – Based on ETF’s experiences. In Proceedings ASEM symposium on technical and vocational education and training.

    Google Scholar 

  • UIL, ETF and CEDEFOP. 2015. Global inventory of regional and national qualifications framework – Volume I: Thematic chapters. http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/publications/2213. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • UNESCO. 2015. Recommendation concerning technical and vocational education and training (TVET). http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=49355&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • Werquin, Patrick. 2007. Moving mountains: Will qualifications systems promote lifelong learning. European Journal of Education 42 (4): 459–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WIP Japan. 2013. Asia syokoku niokeru sikakuwakugumi to syokugyoukyouiku ni kansuru chousa kenkyuu (Research study on qualifications framework and vocational education in Asian countries). Commissioned research report for the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Tokyo: MEXT (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimoto, Keiichi. 2003. Sukottolando ni okeru tanki koutoukyouiku wo fukumeta sikakuseido to tayouna gakusyuukeiro no sekkei (Designing pathways and qualification framework focusing on short cycle higher education in Scotland). Research in Academic Degree 17: 51–68. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimoto, Keiichi, ed. 2014a. Non-university higher education and qualifications framework – Report on the international workshop, EQ working paper series no.1. Fukuoka: Kyushu University. (in English and Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimoto, Keiichi, ed. 2014b. Japanese mode of tertiary education and globalisation: Qualifications framework and quality assurance, Report on global consortium for the development of core specialist human resources (EQGC Report Series) no. 5. Fukuoka: Kyushu University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimoto, Keiichi. 2016a. Reconstruction of qualifications system on education, training and occupations in Japan. In Dual-track development of tertiary education and relevance of national qualifications frameworks, Report on global consortium for the development of core specialist human resources (EQGC report series) no. 12, ed. Keiichi Yoshimoto, 45–72. Fukuoka: Kyushu University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimoto, Keiichi, ed. 2016b. Dual-track development of tertiary education and relevance of national qualifications frameworks, Report on global consortium for the development of core specialist human resources (EQGC report series) no. 12. Fukuoka: Kyushu University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiichi Yoshimoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Yoshimoto, K. (2018). Feasibility and Challenges on a National Qualifications Framework and Permeability in Education and Training System in Japan. In: Latiner Raby, R., Valeau, E. (eds) Handbook of Comparative Studies on Community Colleges and Global Counterparts. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50911-2_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics