Abstract
This chapter constitutes the empirical heart of the book. Two electrophysiological (EEG) experiments were designed to investigate how the build-up of linguistic context might impact neurocognitive responses to affective adjectives in the first (L1) and second (L2) language of proficient, immersed Polish-English bilinguals. Experiment 2, published elsewhere (Jończyk et al., Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 16(3):527–540, 2016), is distilled to its essence. In experiment 1, participants viewed noun-adjective pairs (e.g. war-dead), and were asked to determine whether the pair was related in meaning. In experiment 2, the same adjectives were embedded in natural sentential context (e.g. Incurably ill Patrick did not realise that in a month he would already be dead); here, participants decided whether the sentences were meaningful. This “pragmatic twist” in the design enabled for the first time to uncover robust differences in cortical activation to affective adjectives in L1 and L2 that revealed themselves both in the early (N400 modulation) and late (LPC modulation) stages of processing. This effect was limited to adjectives embedded in affectively salient sentences, providing evidence that affective experience is boosted when individuals read natural language, which, in turn, may reveal differences in affect processing in the bilinguals’ respective languages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Note that in the present study it turned out to be impossible to form semantically unrelated noun-adjective dyads that would be at the same time affectively congruent, as was the case for the neutral prime condition.
- 2.
Only applicable in the analysis of the bilingual group.
References
American Electroencephalographic Society. (1994). American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines in electroencephalography, evoked potentials, and polysomnography. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 11(1), 1–147.
Bar, M. (2007). The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 280–289.
Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: Memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1235–1243. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0310.
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 893–912. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893.
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(1), 104–128. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.0005.
Bayer, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2010). Reading emotional words within sentences: The impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78(3), 299–307. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.09.004.
Bayer, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2012). P1 and beyond: Functional separation of multiple emotion effects in word recognition. Psychophysiology, 49(7), 959–969. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01381.x.
Bentin, S., Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1993). Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing. Psychophysiology, 30(2), 161–169.
Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60(4), 343–355.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 581–607). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 401–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401.
Cacioppo, J. T., Crites, S. L., Berntson, G. G., & Coles, M. G. H. (1993). If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should they not affect the event-related brain potential? Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 4(2), 108–112.
Cacioppo, J. T., Crites, S. L., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorizations: I. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of trait negativity and extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1), 115–125. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.115.
Citron, F. M. M. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122(3), 211–226.
Citron, F. M. M., Weekes, B. S., & Ferstl, E. C. (2013). Effects of valence and arousal on written word recognition: Time course and ERP correlates. Neuroscience Letters, 533, 90–95. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.10.054.
Conrad, M., Recio, G., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). The time course of emotion effects in first and second language processing: A cross cultural ERP study with German-Spanish bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 351. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00351.
De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2002). Affective priming of semantic categorisation responses. Cognition and Emotion, 16(5), 643–666. doi:10.1080/02699930143000419.
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21.
Dorjee, D., Lally, N., Darrall-Rew, J., & Thierry, G. (2015). Dispositional mindfulness and semantic integration of emotional words: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuroscience Research, 97, 45–51. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2015.03.002.
Estes, Z., & Adelman, J. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: Comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 8(4), 441–444. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.441; discussion 445–457.
Estes, Z., & Verges, M. (2008). Freeze or flee? Negative stimuli elicit selective responding. Cognition, 108(2), 557–565.
Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 115–141. doi:10.1080/0269993004200024.
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–238.
Fischler, I., & Bradley, M. (2006). Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: Words, phrases, and task effects. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 185–203. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56009-1.
Hahne, A. (2001). What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 251–266.
Hajcak, G., Dunning, J. P., & Foti, D. (2009). Motivated and controlled attention to emotion: Time-course of the late positive potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(3), 505–510. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.028.
Herbert, C., Junghofer, M., & Kissler, J. (2008). Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 45(3), 487–498. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.x.
Herbert, C., Pauli, P., & Herbert, B. M. (2011). Self-reference modulates the processing of emotional stimuli in the absence of explicit self-referential appraisal instructions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(5), 653–661. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq082.
Hermans, D., Houwer, J. D., & Eelen, P. (1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Cognition & Emotion, 8(6), 515–533. doi:10.1080/02699939408408957.
Herring, D. R., White, K. R., Jabeen, L. N., Hinojos, M., Terrazas, G., Reyes, S. M., … Crites, S. L. J. (2013). On the automatic activation of attitudes: A quarter century of evaluative priming research. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1062–1089. doi:10.1037/a0031309.
Hinojosa, J. A., Méndez-Bértolo, C., & Pozo, M. A. (2010). Looking at emotional words is not the same as reading emotional words: Behavioral and neural correlates. Psychophysiology, 47(4), 748–757.
Holcomb, P. J. (1988). Automatic and attentional processing: an event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming. Brain and Language, 35(1), 66–85.
Holt, D. J., Lynn, S. K., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2009). Neurophysiological correlates of comprehending emotional meaning in context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(11), 2245–2262. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21151.
Jończyk, R., Boutonnet, B., Musiał, K., Hoemann, K., & Thierry, G. (2016). The bilingual brain turns a blind eye to negative statements in the second language. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(3), 527–540.
Jung, T. P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T. W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 163–178.
Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Research, 1148, 138–148. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.044.
Kissler, J., Assadollahi, R., & Herbert, C. (2006). Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: Insights from ERP studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 147–183.
Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Winkler, I., & Junghofer, M. (2009). Emotion and attention in visual word processing—An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.004.
Kissler, J., & Koessler, S. (2011). Emotionally positive stimuli facilitate lexical decisions-an ERP study. Biological Psychology, 86(3), 254–264. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.12.006.
Klauer, K. C., & Musch, J. (2003). Affective priming: Findings and theories. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 7–49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123.
Li, P., Zhang, F., Tsai, E., & Puls, B. (2014). Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 17(3), 673–680. doi:10.1017/S1366728913000606.
Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 213. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213.
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., Wodniecka, Z., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). SUBTLEX-PL: Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 471–483. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0489-4.
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001.
Matlin, M. W., & Stang, D. J. (1978). The Pollyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2005). Processing semantic anomalies in two languages: An electrophysiological exploration in both languages of Spanish-English bilinguals. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 205–220. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.010.
Moreno, E. M., & Vázquez, C. (2011). Will the glass be half full or half empty? Brain potentials and emotional expectations. Biological Psychology, 88(1), 131–140. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.003.
Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723–739.
Naumann, E., Bartussek, D., Diedrich, O., & Laufer, M. E. (1992). Assessing cognitive and affective information processing functions of the brain by means of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Journal of Psychophysiology, 6(4), 285–298.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106(3), 226–254. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226.
Opitz, B., & Degner, J. (2012). Emotionality in a second language: It’s a matter of time. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1961–1967. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.021.
Palazova, M., Mantwill, K., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2011). Are effects of emotion in single words non-lexical? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2766–2775. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.005.
Pavlenko, A. (2012). Affective processing in bilingual speakers: Disembodied cognition? International Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 405–428. doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.743665.
Ponari, M., Rodríguez-Cuadrado, S., Vinson, D., Fox, N., Costa, A., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). Processing advantage for emotional words in bilingual speakers. Emotion, 15(5), 644–652. doi:10.1037/emo0000061.
Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380–391.
Rohr, L., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2015). Affective responses to emotional words are boosted in communicative situations. NeuroImage, 109, 273–282. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.031.
Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 28–43. doi:10.3758/CABN.9.1.28.
Schindler, S., & Kissler, J. (2016). People matter: Perceived sender identity modulates cerebral processing of socio-emotional language feedback. NeuroImage, 134, 160–169. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.052.
Schindler, S., Wegrzyn, M., Steppacher, I., & Kissler, J. (2014). It’s all in your head—How anticipating evaluation affects the processing of emotional trait adjectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1292. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01292.
Schindler, S., Wegrzyn, M., Steppacher, I., & Kissler, J. (2015). Perceived communicative context and emotional content amplify visual word processing in the fusiform gyrus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(15), 601–6019. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3346-14.2015.
Schupp, H. T., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J., & Junghöfer, M. (2006). Emotion and attention: Event-related brain potential studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 31–51.
Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2003). Emotional facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex. Psychological Science, 14(1), 7–13.
Scott, G. G., O’Donnell, P. J., Leuthold, H., & Sereno, S. C. (2009). Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.010.
Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12530–12535. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609927104.
Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2010). The brain is a prediction machine that cares about good and bad—any implications for neuropragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 181–208.
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.850521.
Vinson, D., Ponari, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). How does emotional content affect lexical processing? Cognition & Emotion, 28(4), 737–746. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.851068.
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x.
Winkielman, P., Zajonc, R. B., & Schwarz, N. (1997). Subliminal affective priming resists attributional interventions. Cognition and Emotion, 11(4), 433–465. doi:10.1080/026999397379872.
Wu, Y. J., Athanassiou, S., Dorjee, D., Roberts, M., & Thierry, G. (2012). Brain potentials dissociate emotional and conceptual cross-modal priming of environmental sounds. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 22(3), 577–583. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr128.
Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2012). How reading in a second language protects your heart. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(19), 6485–6489. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6119-11.2012.
Yap, M. J., & Seow, C. S. (2014). The influence of emotion on lexical processing: Insights from RT distributional analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 526–533. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0525-x.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151.
Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117–123. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117.
Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31–58). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jończyk, R. (2016). Affective Word Processing in Native and Nonnative English Speakers: A Neuropragmatic Perspective. In: Affect-Language Interactions in Native and Non-Native English Speakers. The Bilingual Mind and Brain Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47635-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47635-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47634-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47635-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)