Skip to main content

Negotiating Interpersonal Relations in School–University Collaboration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 489 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

This chapter examines the discursive strategies that were used in the emails of two university researchers and two school teachers to negotiate and manage collaboration while engaged in a collaborative action research project. This case study was situated in a context when key educational reform was being introduced in secondary schools at the time, with school–university collaboration seen as a way to build teachers’ capacity to implement new assessment practices in English language classrooms. It examines the complexities of negotiating collaboration as a social practice in institutional cultures in a non-Western sociocultural setting. A major theme in this chapter is to examine how collaboration ‘talk’ constitutes the enactment of interpersonal relations. The findings suggest that the discursive construction of interpersonal relations in school–university collaboration is highly complex in the Hong Kong sociocultural context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education (pp. 289–297). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. (Eds.). (2006). Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, J. (2001). Action research. Virginia: TESOL Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The Will to Knowledge. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans. Vol. 1). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, B. (2009). Collaborative Teacher Development. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 241–249). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. S., Yu, W. M., Lam, T. S., & Fok, P. K. (1999). The lack of action research: The case for Hong Kong. [academic]. Educational Action Research, 7(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oja, S. N., & Smulyan, L. (1989). Collaborative action research: A developmental process. Lewes: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S., & Brennan, M. (Eds.). (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. (2006). Teacher-researcher collaboration or teachers’ research. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinker-Sachs, G. (Ed.). (2002). Action research in English language teaching. Hong Kong: City University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action research living theory. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheri Chan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chan, C. (2016). Negotiating Interpersonal Relations in School–University Collaboration. In: School-University Partnerships in English Language Teacher Education. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32619-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32619-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32617-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32619-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics