Abstract
Optimizing the physician-patient relationship is perhaps the most fundamental piece of the adherence challenge. Physicians who evoke feelings of trust, confidence, and empathy from their patients are more likely to observe good patient adherence [1]. Although the term “compliance,” based on a paternalistic view of the clinical encounter, is now considered outdated, the regimen is still suggested by the physician more often than not. Patients who want to please their physician are likely to be more willing to make an honest attempt to perform the treatment regimen correctly. Starting off well, and consequently seeing early improvement in disease, is likely to lead to higher satisfaction and long-term adherence [1, 2]. In contrast, patients with negative feelings toward their physician are likely to be more influenced by fears, temporary setbacks (such as side effects), and gradual loss of patience with the regimen, which are all major reasons for poor adherence and early discontinuation. Trust is also a two-way street, influencing the reliability of communication from the patient to the physician as well [3]. With a better rapport, it is more likely that patients will honestly admit areas of concern, and physicians will gain better information to produce good decisions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baldwin HE (2006) Tricks for improving compliance with acne therapy. Dermatol Ther 19(4):224–236
Feldman SR, Horn EJ, Balkrishnan R et al (2008) Psoriasis: improving adherence to topical therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 59(6):1009–1016
Feldman SR (2009) Practical ways to improve patients’ treatment outcomes. Medical Quality Enhancement Corporation, Winston-Salem
Uhas AA, Camacho FT, Feldman SR, Balkrishnan R (2008) The relationship between physician friendliness and caring, and patient satisfaction: findings from an internet-based survey. Patient 1(2):91–96
Felkey BG (1995) Adherence screening and monitoring. Am Pharm NS35(7):42–51; quiz 52–53
Glenn C, McMichael A, Feldman SR (2012) Measuring patient satisfaction changes patient satisfaction. J Dermatol Treat 23(2):81–82
Fagerlin A, Pignone M, Abhyankar P et al (2013) Clarifying values: an updated review. BMC Med Informat Decis Making 13(Suppl 2):S8
Pieterse AH, de Vries M, Kunneman M, Stiggelbout AM, Feldman-Stewart D (2013) Theory-informed design of values clarification methods: a cognitive psychological perspective on patient health-related decision making. Soc Sci Med 77:156–163
Noar SM, Harrington NG, Van Stee SK, Aldrich RS (2011) Tailored health communication to change lifestyle behaviors. Am J Lifestyle Med 5:112–122
Rimer BK, Kreuter MW (2006) Advancing tailored health communication: a persuasion and message effects perspective. J Commun 56:S184–S201
Strecher VJ, McClure J, Alexander G et al (2008) The role of engagement in a tailored web-based smoking cessation program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 10(5):e36
Reyna VF (2004) How people make decisions that involve risk: a dual-processes approach. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 13(2):60–66
Blalock SJ, Slota C, Devellis BM et al (2014) Patient-rheumatologist communication concerning prescription medications: getting to the gist. Arthritis Care Res 66(4):542–550
Reyna VF, Lloyd FJ (2006) Physician decision making and cardiac risk: effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing. J Exp Psychol Appl 12(3):179–195
Gelfand JM, Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB (2006) Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis. JAMA 296(14):1735–1741
Davis SA, Feldman SR (2014) An illustrated dictionary of behavioral economics for healthcare professionals. CreateSpace, Charleston
Sunstein CR (2002) Probability neglect: emotions, worst cases, and law. Yale Law J 112:61–107
Rottenstreich Y, Hsee CK (2001) Money, kisses, and electric shocks: on the affective psychology of risk. Psychol Sci 12(3):185–190
Ntuen E, Taylor SL, Kinney M, O’Neill JL, Krowchuk DP, Feldman SR (2010) Physicians’ perceptions of an eczema action plan for atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Treat 21(1):28–33
DiMatteo MR (2004) Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care 42(3):200–209
Yentzer BA, Gosnell AL, Clark AR et al (2011) A randomized controlled pilot study of strategies to increase adherence in teenagers with acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 64(4):793–795
Kyngas H, Rissanen M (2001) Support as a crucial predictor of good compliance of adolescents with a chronic disease. J Clin Nurs 10(6):767–774
Kyngas H, Hentinen M, Barlow JH (1998) Adolescents’ perceptions of physicians, nurses, parents and friends: help or hindrance in compliance with diabetes self-care? J Adv Nurs 27(4):760–769
Drotar D (2009) Physician behavior in the care of pediatric chronic illness: association with health outcomes and treatment adherence. J Dev Behav Pediatr JDBP 30(3):246–254
Sleath B, Carpenter DM, Ayala GX et al (2011) Provider discussion, education, and question-asking about control medications during pediatric asthma visits. Int J Pediatr 2011:212160
Bailey SC, Belter LT, Pandit AU, Carpenter DM, Carlos E, Wolf MS (2014) The availability, functionality, and quality of mobile applications supporting medication self-management. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 21(3):542–546
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, S.A., Feldman, S.R. (2016). Optimizing the Physician-Patient Relationship and Educating the Patient About Adherence. In: Davis, S. (eds) Adherence in Dermatology. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30994-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30994-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Adis, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30992-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30994-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)