Abstract
In the last 50 years, certain paradigm shifts have taken place in the conception of teaching. These shifts tended to broaden the conception of teaching from a focus on teaching of subject matter (Shulman, 1970), to a focus on contextual learning and teaching in the larger socioeconomic context of the school (UNESCO, 2004), to a focus on social production and reproduction of teaching and learning (Lerman, 2006). The shifts in the conception of teaching have reflected themselves in the roles of the teacher and learner, the meaning of the subject matter, the object of teaching, the role of social, economic, and cultural factors in shaping, and being shaped, by teaching and learning.
The social turn is intended to signal something different, namely the emergence into the mathematics education research community of theories that see meaning, thinking, and reasoning as products of social activity. This goes beyond the idea that social interactions provide a spark that generates or stimulates an individual’s internal meaning-making activity.
(Lerman, 2000, p. 23)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
Cobb, P. (2006). Mathematics Learning as a social practice. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 147–152). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Inoue, N. (2005). The realistic reasons behind unrealistic solutions: The role of interpretive activity in word problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 69–83.
Jurdak, M. (2006). Contrasting perspectives and performance of high school students on problem solving in real world, situated, and school contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 283–301.
Jurdak, M., & Shahin, I. (1999). An ethnographic study of the computational strategies of a group of young street vendors in Beirut. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(2), 155–172.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Lerman, S. (2006). Cultural psychology, anthropology and sociology: The developing ‘strong’ social turn. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 171–188). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Shulman, L. S. (1970). Psychology and mathematics education. In E. Begle (Ed.), Mathematics education (pp. 23–71). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
UNESCO. (2004). Global monitoring report, Education For All (EFA): The quality imperative. Paris: UNESCO.
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In M. Daniels, M. Cole, & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jurdak, M. (2016). Teaching Real-World Problem Solving in School Mathematics: A Multiple-Perspective Framework. In: Learning and Teaching Real World Problem Solving in School Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08204-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08204-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08203-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08204-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)