Skip to main content

Complications from Seizures During Video-EEG Monitoring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Continuous video-EEG monitoring (VEM) remains the preferred diagnostic tool to classify seizure-like events and is often the first step in epilepsy surgery evaluation process. Hospital admissions for VEM are typically limited to a few days to capture the typical events of interest. To capture events, the patients are often subjected to appropriate activation procedures designed to record events in a safe and efficient manner. Tapering antiseizure medications (ASM) is one technique commonly used to provoke habitual attacks. Reducing ASM after admission to the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) raises concerns about producing complications associated with lowering medication. These include status epilepticus, increased numbers of seizures and seizure clusters, and worsening severity of seizures such as provoking convulsive seizures when the habitual seizures are less severe. The patient, referring physician, and care team working in the EMU should be aware of the possibilities of complications and how to handle them when they occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Noe K, Drazkowski J. Safety of the long-term video electroencephalographic monitoring for the evaluation epilepsy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(6):495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wirrell E. Epilepsy related injuries. Epilepsia. 2006;47(supp 1):79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rugg-Gunn F, Duncan J, et al. From unwitnessed fatality to witnessed rescue: nonpharmacologic interventions in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2016;57(supp 1):26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dobesberger J, Walser G, et al. Video-EEG monitoring: safety and adverse events in 507 consecutive patients. Epilepsia. 2011;52:443–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dobesberger J, Hofler J, et al. Personalized safety measures reduce the adverse event rate of long term video EEG. Epilepsia open. 2017;2(4):400–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. NAEC-Epilepsy.org National association of epilepsy centers; Updates and Resources; 2018 sample protocols. Accessed 31 May 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph F. Drazkowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Drazkowski, J.F. (2021). Complications from Seizures During Video-EEG Monitoring. In: Tatum, W.O., Sirven, J.I., Cascino, G.D. (eds) Epilepsy Case Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59078-9_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59078-9_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59077-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59078-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics