Abstract
In recent years, the flipped classroom has been widely adopted. It is a student-centered learning model that has been acknowledged in the literatures. However, students’ engagements in the in-class activities of flipped classrooms will affect their overall learning performance. Especially, EFL learners tend to be inactive in English class. It is important for teachers to provide interactive learning activities and get instant feedbacks from the students to keep them engaged in class. Interactive Response Systems (IRS) provides the opportunities for students to interact positively with the teacher. They also allow the teacher to know better of student’s individual learning situation. In this paper, an IRS was conducted in the in-class learning activities of a flipped English classroom. A quasi-experiment was conducted in a primary school in Taiwan to explore the effects of this approach on students’ learning achievement and learning motivation. The experimental results indicate that conducting IRS in flipped English classrooms could significantly improve students’ learning achievement, but the students’ learning motivation was not dramatically promoted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Chen Hsieh, J.S., Wu, W.V., Marek, M.W.: Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 30(1–2), 1–21 (2017)
Chen, C.: Understanding mobile English-learning gaming adopters in the self-learning market: the uses and gratification expectancy model. Comput. Educ. 126, 217–230 (2018)
Liu, T., Chu, Y.: Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 630–643 (2010)
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W., Huang, Y., Liu, C.: Investigating applications of speech-to-text recognition technology for a face-to-face seminar to assist learning of non-native English-speaking participants. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 25(1), 119–134 (2015)
Hwang, G., Lai, C., Wang, S.: Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. J. Comput. Educ. 2(4), 449–473 (2015)
Lai, C., Hwang, G.: A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Comput. Educ. 100, 126–140 (2016)
Halili, S., Razak, R., Zainuddin, Z.: Exploring the use of ‘Wiggio’ to support online collaborative learning for adult learners. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Congress on Economics, Social Sciences and Information Management, 15-21 (2016)
Bakla, A.: Learner-generated materials in a flipped pronunciation class: a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Comput. Educ. 125, 14–38 (2018)
Schell, J., Lukoff, B., Mazur, E.: Catalyzing learner engagement using cutting-edge classroom response systems in higher education. In: Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Classroom Technologies: Classroom Response Systems and Mediated Discourse Technologies, pp. 233–261 (2013)
Heaslip, G., Donovan, P., Cullen, J.: Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes. Active Learn. High. Educ. 15(1), 11–24 (2013)
Johnson, K., Lillis, C.: Clickers in the laboratory: student thoughts and views. Interdisc. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 5, 139–151 (2010)
Trees, A.R., Jackson, M.H.: The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learn. Media Technol. 32(1), 21–40 (2007)
Chien, Y., Chang, Y., Chang, C.: Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educ. Res. Rev. 17, 1–18 (2016)
Sun, J.C.Y., Martinez, B., Seli, H.: Just-in-time or plenty-of-time teaching? Different electronic feedback devices and their effect on student engagement. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(2), 234–244 (2014)
Nguyen, B., Yu, X., Japutra, A., Chen, C.S.: Reverse teaching: exploring student perceptions of “flip teaching”. Active Learn. High. Educ. 17(1), 51–61 (2016)
Bergmann, J.: Sams: A. Flipped learning for English instruction. International Society for Technology in Education, Arlington (2015)
McDonald, K., Smith, C.M.: The flipped classroom for professional development: part i. benefits and strategies. J. Continuing Educ. Nurs. 44(10), 437–438 (2013)
Awidi, I.T., Paynter, M.: The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Comput. Educ. 128, 269–283 (2019)
Thai, N.T., De Wever, B., Valcke, M.: The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Comput. Educ. 107, 113–126 (2017)
Foldnes, N.: The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learn. High. Educ. 17(1), 39–49 (2016)
Sage, M., Sele, P.: Reflective journaling as a flipped classroom technique to increase reading and participation with social work students. J. Soc. Work Educ. 51(4), 668–681 (2015)
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, Chen, N.S.: Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Comput. Educ. 79, 16–27 (2014)
Basal, A.: The implementation of a flipped classroom in Foreign Language teaching. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 16, 28–37 (2015)
Lin, C., Hwang, G.: A flipped classroom approach to supporting game-based learning activities for EFL business writing course. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (2018)
Moran, K., Milsom, A.: The flipped classroom in counselor education. Counselor Educ. Supervision 54(1), 32–43 (2015)
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., Sese, F.J.: Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Comput. Educ. 62, 102–110 (2013)
Mun, W.K., Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S.: The impact of the use of response pad system on the learning of secondary school physics concepts: a Singapore quasi-experiment study. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 40(5), 848–860 (2009)
Kay, R., Knaack, L.: Exploring the use of audience response systems in secondary school science classrooms. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18(5), 382–392 (2009)
Snyder, K.D.: Ropes, poles, and space: active learning in business education. Active Learn. High. Educ. 4(2), 159–167 (2003)
Cakiroglu, U., Erdogdu, F., Gokoglu, S.: Clickers in EFL classrooms: evidence from two different uses. Contemp. Educ. Technol. Contemporary 9, 171–185 (2018)
Wang, L., Chen, M.: The effects of game strategy and preference-matching on flow experience and programming performance in game-based learning. Innovations Educ. Teach. Int. 47(1), 39–52 (2010)
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., McKeachie, W.J.: A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 338122) (1991)
Akçayır, G., Akçayır, M.: The flipped classroom: a review of its advantages and challenges. Comput. Educ. 126, 334–345 (2018)
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 54–67 (2000)
Yilmaz, R.: Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Comput. Hum. Behav. 70, 251–260 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, W., Tseng, J.C.R. (2019). Engaging Students in a Flipped English Classroom by Conducting an Interactive Response System and Its Effects on Students’ Learning Achievement and Learning Motivation. In: Rønningsbakk, L., Wu, TT., Sandnes, F., Huang, YM. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11937. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35343-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35343-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35342-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35343-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)