Abstract
Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most common osteoporotic fractures that occur in the United States each year with an estimated incidence of over 700,000 occurring annually (Ensrud and Schousboe, Bone 364:1634–1642, 2011; Riggs and Melton, Bone 17, 1995). These numbers are likely a gross underestimate of the true incidence based on the delay in clinical presentation that is frequently associated with compression fractures (Ensrud and Schousboe, Bone 364:1634–1642, 2011; Riggs and Melton, Bone 17, 1995; Fink, J Bone Miner Res 20(7):1216–1222, 2005; Melton, Am J Epidemiol 129(5):1000–1011, 1989). While decreased bone mineral density secondary to age, endocrinopathies, or other systemic conditions play a large role in the pathophysiology of compression fractures, these factors alone do not explain the common fracture patterns that afflict the osteoporotic population.
In order to fully understand the pathophysiology and management of compression fractures, knowledge of the normal anatomy and physiology of the vertebral column is necessary. Examining the vertebral body, the intervertebral disc, and the biomechanical stresses that act upon them with normal physiologic forces explains why certain fractures occur in predictable locations and patterns.
This understanding gives rise to a morphologic fracture classification that includes anterior wedge, biconcave, and crush fracture patterns, though many different classification systems have also been described. These fracture patterns are largely explained by the unique anatomy and physiology of the vertebral bodies and the adjacent intervertebral discs.
The mechanism by which VCFs cause pain is also worth examining. Multiple studies have shown that VCFs cause pain through multiple mechanisms, though there does not appear to be one predominant pathophysiology. When observing pain patterns associated with VCFs, it is worth differentiating the patients who experience acute pain at the time of injury versus those who experience a more delayed and chronic pain, as the pathophysiology differs significantly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ensrud KE, Schousboe JT. Vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(17):1634–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcp1009697.
Riggs Bl, Melton Lj. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone. 1995;17(5):S505. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(95)00258-4.
Fink HA, et al. What proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities is clinically diagnosed and vice versa? J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(7):1216–22. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.050314.
Melton LJ, et al. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(5):1000–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115204.
Antoniou J, et al. The human lumbar endplate. Spine. 1996;21(10):1153–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199605150-00006.
Aspden RM, et al. Determination of collagen fibril orientation in the cartilage of vertebral end plate. Connect Tissue Res. 1981;9(2):83–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008208109160244.
Lotz JC, et al. The role of the vertebral end plate in low back pain. Global Spine J. 2013;3(3):153–63. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1347298.
Hou Y, Luo Z. A study on the structural properties of the lumbar endplate. Spine. 2009;34(12):E427. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a2ea0a.
Zhao F-D, et al. Vertebral fractures usually affect the cranial endplate because it is thinner and supported by less-dense trabecular bone. Bone. 2009;44(2):372–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.10.048.
Jiang G, et al. Vertebral fractures in the elderly may not always be osteoporotic. Bone. 2010;47(1):111–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.019.
Jensen Ks, et al. A model of vertebral trabecular bone architecture and its mechanical properties. Bone. 1990;11(6):417–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(90)90137-n.
Smit TH, et al. Structure and function of vertebral trabecular bone. Spine. 1997;22(24):2823–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199712150-00005.
Hulme Pa, et al. Regional variation in vertebral bone morphology and its contribution to vertebral fracture strength. Bone. 2007;41(6):946–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.019.
Adams MA, Dolan P. Biomechanics of vertebral compression fractures and clinical application. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(12):1703–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1355-9.
Pollintine P, et al. Neural arch load-bearing in old and degenerated spines. J Biomech. 2004;37(2):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00308-7.
Hordon Ld, et al. Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: I. two-dimensional histology. Bone. 2000;27(2):271–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00329-x.
Pollintine P, et al. Intervertebral disc degeneration can lead to stress-shielding of the anterior vertebral body. Spine. 2004;29(7):774–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000119401.23006.d2.
Mosekilde L. Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure – biomechanical consequences. Bone. 1989;10(6):425–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3450-0_4.
Adams MA, et al. Stress distributions inside intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78-B(6):965–72. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.78b6.0780965.
Adams MA, et al. Intervertebral disc degeneration can predispose to anterior vertebral fractures in the thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(9):1409–16. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.060609.
Humzah MD, Soames RW. Human intervertebral disc: structure and function. Anat Rec. 1988;220(4):337–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092200402.
Roughley PJ. Biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration. Spine. 2004;29(23):2691–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000146101.53784.b1.
Twomey L, Taylor J. Age changes in lumbar intervertebral discs. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56(6):496–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678508993043.
Hansson TH, et al. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading. J Orthop Res. 1987;5(4):479–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100050403.
Keller TS, et al. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. I. Creep analysis during static compressive loading. J Orthop Res. 1987;5(4):467–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100050402.
Zioupos P, et al. Microcracking damage and the fracture process in relation to strain rate in human cortical bone tensile failure. J Biomech. 2008;41(14):2932–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.025.
Eastell R, et al. Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;6(3):207–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650060302.
Ismail AA, et al. Number and type of vertebral deformities: epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9(3):206–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980050138.
Faciszewski T, Mckiernan F. Calling all vertebral fractures classification of vertebral compression fractures: a consensus for comparison of treatment and outcome. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(2):185–91. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.185.
Rao RD, Singrakhia MD. Painful osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Bone Joint SurgAm. 2003;85(10):2010–22. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200310000-00024.
Smith-Bindman R, et al. A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;6(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650060106.
Genant HK, et al. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8(9):1137–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650080915.
Black DM, et al. Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14(5):821–8. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.5.821.
Holmes Ad, Hukins Dwl. Fatigue failure at the disc-vertebra interface during cyclic axial compression of cadaveric specimens. Clin Biomech. 1994;9(2):133–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(94)90037-x.
Holmes AD, et al. End-plate displacement during compression of lumbar vertebra-disc-vertebra segments and the mechanism of failure. Spine. 1993;18(1):128–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199301000-00019.
Landham PR, et al. Pathogenesis of vertebral anterior wedge deformity. Spine. 2015;40(12):902–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000905.
Pollintine P, et al. Bone creep can cause progressive vertebral deformity. Bone. 2009;45(3):466–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2009.05.015.
Roberts S, et al. Biochemical and structural properties of the cartilage end-plate and its relation to the intervertebral disc. Spine. 1989;14(2):166–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198902000-00005.
Brinckmann P, et al. Deformation of the vertebral end-plate under axial loading of the spine. Spine. 1983;8(8):851–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198311000-00007.
Rockoff SD, et al. The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Calcif Tissue Res. 1969;3(1):163–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02058659.
Cooper C, et al. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7(2):221–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650070214.
Lyritis GP, et al. Analgesic effect of Salmon calcitonin suppositories in patients with acute pain due to recent osteoporotic vertebral crush fractures: a prospective double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study. Clin J Pain. 1999;15(4):284–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-199912000-00004.
Bogduk N, et al. The pain of vertebral compression fractures can arise in the posterior elements. Pain Med. 2010;11(11):1666–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00963.x.
Gennari C, et al. Use of calcitonin in the treatment of bone pain associated with osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991;49(S2):S9. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02561370.
Knopp JA, et al. Calcitonin for treating acute pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Osteoporos Int. 2004;16(10):1281–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1798-8.
Silverman S. The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone. 1992;13:S27. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(92)90193-z.
Doo T-H, et al. Clinical relevance of pain patterns in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Korean Med Sci. 2008;23(6):1005. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2008.23.6.1005.
Huang C. Vertebral fracture and other predictors of physical impairment and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(21):2469–75. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.156.21.2469.
Klazen CA, Lohle PN, De Vries J, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an Open-Label Randomised Trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1085–92. Epub 2010 Aug 9.” The Spine Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, 2011, pp. 88–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.11.011.
Blasco J, et al. Effect of vertebroplasty on pain relief, quality of life, and the incidence of new vertebral fractures: a 12-month randomized follow-up, controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(5):1159–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1564.
Lieberman I. Vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic and osteolytic vertebral compression fractures: vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Advances in Spinal Stabilization. Prog Neurol Surg. 2003:240–50. https://doi.org/10.1159/000072646.
Bostrom MPG, Lane JM. Future directions: augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral bodies. Spine. 1997;22(Supplement):38S. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199712151-00007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ostergaard, P.J., Cha, T.D. (2020). Biomechanics of Vertebral Compression Fractures. In: Razi, A., Hershman, S. (eds) Vertebral Compression Fractures in Osteoporotic and Pathologic Bone. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33861-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33861-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33860-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33861-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)