Skip to main content

Indeterminate Biliary Strictures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 582 Accesses

Abstract

No standard definition for indeterminate biliary stricture exists. Biliary strictures are typically referred to as indeterminate in cases with nondiagnostic lab work, cross-sectional imaging, and brushings and/or intraductal biopsies obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or in cases of benign results but a strong clinical suspicion of malignancy. Indeterminate biliary strictures pose a diagnostic challenge for endoscopists. This diagnostic dilemma can either delay surgical intervention and targeted treatment for malignant lesions or results in unnecessary surgical resections in patients with benign strictures. A benign cause is found in approximately 15–24% of surgical resections for presumed malignant strictures (Bowlus et al., Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:28-37, 2016; Singh et al., Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 3:22, 2015). Traditional diagnosis using ERCP with brush cytology and fluoroscopic-guided biopsies lacks sensitivity and precision in distinguishing between benign or malignant lesions. Diagnostic accuracy of malignancy has improved with the combination of newly discovered circulating tumor markers, advancement in ancillary cytology, targeted tissue acquisition techniques, and better-quality imaging and endoscopic modalities including peroral cholangioscopy (POC), intraductal endoscopic ultrasonography (IDUS), and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE). Despite these advancements, up to 20% of biliary strictures remain indeterminate after additional evaluation and ultimately undergo surgical intervention for definitive diagnosis (Bowlus et al., Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:28-37, 2016). No standard approach to evaluating a patient with an indeterminate biliary stricture exists. Often, multiple modalities and repeat procedures are required to achieve a definitive diagnosis. This chapter discusses the various modalities that may be utilized in working up an indeterminate biliary stricture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bowlus CL, Olson KA, Gershwin ME. Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(1):28–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh A, Gelrud A, Agarwal B. Biliary strictures: diagnostic considerations and approach. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2015;3(1):22–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Victor DW, Sherman S, Karakan T, Khashab MA. Current endoscopic approach to indeterminate biliary strictures. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(43):6197–205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tabibian JH, Visrodia KH, Levy MJ, Gostout CJ. Advanced endoscopic imaging of indeterminate biliary strictures. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7(18):1268–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V, Konjeti R, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):168–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Korc P, Sherman S. ERCP tissue sampling. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(4):557–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parsi MA, Li A, Li CP, Goggins M. DNA methylation alterations in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography brush samples of patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(11):1270–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Govil H, Reddy V, Kluskens L, Treaba D, Massarani-Wafai R, Selvaggi S, et al. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;26(5):273–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Selvaggi SM. Biliary brushing cytology. Cytopathology. 2004;15(2):74–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Singhi AD, Slivka A. Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures: is it time to FISH or cut bait? Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(6):1236–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Caillol F, Filoche B, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Refined probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy classification for biliary strictures: the Paris Classification. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(6):1784–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khashab MA, Fockens P, Al-Haddad MA. Utility of EUS in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures and suspected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(5):1024–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DeWitt J, Misra VL, Leblanc JK, McHenry L, Sherman S. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(3):325–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang W, Shpaner A, Krishna SG, Ross WA, Bhutani MS, Tamm EP, et al. Use of EUS-FNA in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm without a definitive mass on CT. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78(1):73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weilert F, Bhat YM, Binmoeller KF, Kane S, Jaffee IM, Shaw RE, et al. EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(1):97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadeghi A, Mohamadnejad M, Islami F, Keshtkar A, Biglari M, Malekzadeh R, et al. Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA for malignant biliary stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(2):290–8 e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Moura DTH, Moura EGH, Bernardo WM, De Moura ETH, Baraca FI, Kondo A, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasound for tissue diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7(1):10–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Topazian M. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Clin Endosc. 2012;45(3):328–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohamadnejad M, DeWitt JM, Sherman S, LeBlanc JK, Pitt HA, House MG, et al. Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(1):71–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heimbach JK, Sanchez W, Rosen CB, Gores GJ. Trans-peritoneal fine needle aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with disease dissemination. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(5):356–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. El Chafic AH, Dewitt J, Leblanc JK, El H II, Cote G, House MG, et al. Impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration on postoperative recurrence and survival in cholangiocarcinoma patients. Endoscopy. 2013;45(11):883–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JH, Salem R, Aslanian H, Chacho M, Topazian M. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration of unexplained bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(6):1069–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering DC, Knoefel WT, Rogiers X, Swain P, Thonke F, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(1):45–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gleeson FC, Rajan E, Levy MJ, Clain JE, Topazian MD, Harewood GC, et al. EUS-guided FNA of regional lymph nodes in patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(3):438–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Farrell RJ, Agarwal B, Brandwein SL, Underhill J, Chuttani R, Pleskow DK. Intraductal US is a useful adjunct to ERCP for distinguishing malignant from benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(5):681–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Krishna NB, Saripalli S, Safdar R, Agarwal B. Intraductal US in evaluation of biliary strictures without a mass lesion on CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging: significance of focal wall thickening and extrinsic compression at the stricture site. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66(1):90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tamada K, Kanai N, Ueno N, Ichiyama M, Tomiyama T, Wada S, et al. Limitations of intraductal ultrasonography in differentiating between bile duct cancer in stage T1 and stage T2: in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Endoscopy. 1997;29(8):721–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Menzel J, Poremba C, Dietl KH, Domschke W. Preoperative diagnosis of bile duct strictures--comparison of intraductal ultrasonography with conventional endosonography. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(1):77–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heinzow HS, Kammerer S, Rammes C, Wessling J, Domagk D, Meister T. Comparative analysis of ERCP, IDUS, EUS and CT in predicting malignant bile duct strictures. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(30):10495–503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hasan MK, Navaneethan U, Hawes R, Hebert-Magee S. Improving the diagnostic yield of single-operator cholangioscopy-guided biopsy of indeterminate biliary strictures: ROSE to the rescue? (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(4):681–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Lourdusamy V, Njei B, Varadarajulu S, Hawes RH. Single-operator cholangioscopy and targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(4):608–14 e2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Draganov PV, Chauhan S, Wagh MS, Gupte AR, Lin T, Hou W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(2):347–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Njei B, McCarty TR, Varadarajulu S, Navaneethan U. Cost utility of ERCP-based modalities for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(4):773–81 e10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Othman MO, Guerrero R, Elhanafi S, Davis B, Hernandez J, Houle J, et al. A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(1):151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wallace M, Lauwers GY, Chen Y, Dekker E, Fockens P, Sharma P, et al. Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy. 2011;43(10):882–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Meining A, Chen YK, Pleskow D, Stevens P, Shah RJ, Chuttani R, et al. Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(5):961–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Taunk P, Singh S, Lichtenstein D, Joshi V, Gold J, Sharma A. Improved classification of indeterminate biliary strictures by probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy using the Paris Criteria following biliary stenting. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(10):1778–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Slivka A, Gan I, Jamidar P, Costamagna G, Cesaro P, Giovannini M, et al. Validation of the diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the characterization of indeterminate biliary strictures: results of a prospective multicenter international study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(2):282–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Y, Lu Y, Sun B, Zhang WM, Zhang ZZ, He YP, et al. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of undetermined biliary stenoses: a meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2016;40(6):666–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Peter S, Council L, Bang JY, Neumann H, Monkemuller K, Varadarajulu S, et al. Poor agreement between endoscopists and gastrointestinal pathologists for the interpretation of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy findings. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(47):17993–8000.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Talreja JP, Turner BG, Gress FG, Ho S, Sarkaria S, Paddu N, et al. Pre- and post-training session evaluation for interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for biliary strictures. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(4):577–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hu B, Sun B, Cai Q, Wong Lau JY, Ma S, Itoi T, et al. Asia-Pacific consensus guidelines for endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(1):44–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Petersen BT. Indeterminate biliary stricture. In: Baron TH, Kozarek RA, Carr-Locke DL, editors. ERCP. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 394–404.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Njei B, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Diagnostic yield of bile duct brushings for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(5):783–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Navaneethan U, Njei B, Venkatesh PG, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(6):943–50 e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Siiki A, Rinta-Kiikka I, Koivisto T, Vasama K, Sand J, Laukkarinen J. Spyglass single-operator peroral cholangioscopy seems promising in the evaluation of primary sclerosing cholangitis-related biliary strictures. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(11):1385–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Heif M, Yen RD, Shah RJ. ERCP with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the evaluation of dominant biliary stenoses in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(7):2068–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gotthardt DN, Rudolph G, Kloters-Plachky P, Kulaksiz H, Stiehl A. Endoscopic dilation of dominant stenoses in primary sclerosing cholangitis: outcome after long-term treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(3):527–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie Cosgrove .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Cholangioscopy of the case patient’s extrahepatic bile duct showing targeted biopsies of areas of abnormal appearing biliary epithelium and neovascularization at the level of the stenosis (MP4 195388kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ashkar, M.H., Cosgrove, N. (2019). Indeterminate Biliary Strictures. In: Mullady, D. (eds) Dilemmas in ERCP. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12741-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12741-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12740-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12741-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics