Skip to main content

Considerations for Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy in the Setting of Breast Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Toxicities of Radiation Treatment for Breast Cancer
  • 773 Accesses

Abstract

In patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy, reconstruction, and postmastectomy radiation therapy, reconstruction outcome is impacted by multiple factors related to patient comorbidities, surgical technique, and radiation planning. In this chapter, each of these factors is discussed in light of the available data and potential for reconstruction failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group). APPENDIX effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383:2127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright JL, Parekh A. Updates in postmastectomy radiation. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2017;26:383–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act (WHCRA) In: www.cms.gov. https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-and-Initiatives/Other-Insurance-Protections/whcra_factsheet.html. Accessed 17 Mar 2018.

  4. Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA. 2006;295:383–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee BT, Agarwal JP, Ascherman JA, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline: autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP or Pedicled TRAM abdominal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:651e–64e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:7S–13S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen SA, Hiley C, Nickleach D, Petsuksiri J, Andic F, Riesterer O, Switchenko JM, Torres MA. Breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiation practice. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fowble B, Park C, Wang F, Peled A, Alvarado M, Ewing C, Esserman L, Foster R, Sbitany H, Hanlon A. Rates of reconstruction failure in patients undergoing immediate reconstruction with tissue expanders and/or implants and postmastectomy radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:634–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Sabawi B, Carey JN, Hagopian TM, Sbitany H, Patel KM. Radiation and breast reconstruction: algorithmic approach and evidence-based outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:906–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Piper ML, Evangelista M, Amara D, Daar D, Foster RD, Fowble B, Sbitany H. An innovative risk-reducing approach to postmastectomy radiation delivery after autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jagsi R, Momoh AO, Qi J, Hamill JB, Billig J, Kim HM, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG. Impact of radiotherapy on complications and patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:157–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Momoh AO, Ahmed R, Kelley BP, Aliu O, Kidwell KM, Kozlow JH, Chung KC. A systematic review of complications of implant-based breast reconstruction with Prereconstruction and postreconstruction radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;21:118–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee K-T, Mun G-H. Optimal sequencing of postmastectomy radiotherapy and two stages of prosthetic reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1262–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ricci JA, Epstein S, Momoh AO, Lin SJ, Singhal D, Lee BT. A meta-analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Surg Res. 2017;218:108–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lentz R, Ng R, Higgins SA, Fusi S, Matthew M, Kwei SL. Radiation therapy and expander-implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71:269–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Peled AW, Foster RD, Esserman LJ, Park CC, Hwang ES, Fowble B. Increasing the time to expander-implant exchange after postmastectomy radiation therapy reduces expander-implant failure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:503–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayoub Z, Strom EA, Ovalle V, et al. A 10-year experience with mastectomy and tissue expander placement to facilitate subsequent radiation and reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2965–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Benediktsson K, Perbeck L. Capsular contracture around saline-filled and textured subcutaneously-placed implants in irradiated and non-irradiated breast cancer patients: five years of monitoring of a prospective trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Motwani SB, Strom EA, Schechter NR, Butler CE, Lee GK, Langstein HN, Kronowitz SJ, Meric-Bernstam F, Ibrahim NK, Buchholz TA. The impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the technical delivery of postmastectomy radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, Hu Q, Van Zee K. The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on two-stage implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:588–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Salama LW, Braunstein LZ, Mina A, et al. Single stage permanent implant reconstruction has better outcome than tissue expander/implant in patients treated with postmastectomy radiation. Radiat Oncol Biol. 2017;99:S4–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sacotte R, Fine N, Kim JY, et al. Assessing long-term complications in patients undergoing immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction and adjuvant radiation. PRRO. 9999;7:e91–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taghizadeh R, Moustaki M, Harris S, Roblin P, Farhadi J. Does post-mastectomy radiotherapy affect the outcome and prevalence of complications in immediate DIEP breast reconstruction? A prospective cohort study. Br J Plast Surg. 2015;68:1379–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Clarke-Pearson EM, Chadha M, Dayan E, Dayan JH, Samson W, Sultan MR, Smith ML. Comparison of irradiated versus nonirradiated DIEP flaps in patients undergoing immediate bilateral DIEP reconstruction with unilateral Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT). Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71:250–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Garvey PB, Clemens MW, Hoy AE, Smith B, Zhang H, Kronowitz SJ, Butler CE. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:223–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Peled AW, Foster RD, Ligh C, Esserman LJ, Fowble B, Sbitany H. Impact of total skin-sparing mastectomy incision type on reconstructive complications following radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:169–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, Hwang ES, Alvarado M, Foster RD, Esserman LJ. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Headon H, Kasem A, Manson A, Choy C, Carmichael AR, Mokbel K. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: a prospective observational study in a single centre. Surg Oncol. 2016;25:104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roh DS, Treiser MD, Lafleur EH, Chun YS. Technique to promote symmetry in 2-staged bilateral breast reconstruction in the setting of unilateral postmastectomy radiation. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78:386–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hammond DC, Schmitt WP, O’Connor EA. Treatment of breast animation deformity in implant-based reconstruction with pocket change to the subcutaneous position. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:1540–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mitchell MP, Wagner J, Butterworth J. Subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction, a modern challenge in postmastectomy radiation planning. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8(3):153–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu L, Mohan AT, Abdelsattar JM, Wang Z, Vijayasekaran A, Hwang SM, Tran NV, Saint-Cyr M. Comparison of subcutaneous versus submuscular expander placement in the first stage of immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 2016;69:e77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tasoulis MK, Iqbal FM, Cawthorn S, MacNeill F, Vidya R. Subcutaneous implant breast reconstruction: time to reconsider? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:1636–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wright JL, Takita C, Reis IM, Zhao W, Lee E, Hu JJ. Racial variations in radiation-induced skin toxicity severity: data from a prospective cohort receiving postmastectomy radiation. Radiat Oncol Biol. 2014;90:335–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoopfer D, Holloway C, Gabos Z, et al. Three-arm randomized phase III trial: quality aloe and placebo cream versus powder as skin treatment during breast cancer radiation therapy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15:181–90.e1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Keller LMM, Cohen R, Sopka DM, Li T, Li L, Anderson PR, Fowble BL, Freedman GM. Effect of bra use during radiation therapy for large-breasted women: acute toxicity and treated heart and lung volumes. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013;3:9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Hirsch EM, Khan SA, Fine NA, Bilimoria KY, Kim JYS. The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients. Breast. 2013;22:938–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Huo J, Smith BD, Giordano SH, Reece GP, Shih Y-CT. A comparison of patient-centered economic and clinical outcomes of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction between obese and non-obese patients. Breast. 2016;30:118–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang F, Alvarado M, Ewing C, Esserman L, Foster R, Sbitany H. The impact of breast mass on outcomes of total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate tissue expander–based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:672–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Carnevale A, Scaringi C, Scalabrino G, et al. Terapia radiante dopo ricostruzione mammaria: esiti, complicazioni e soddisfazione delle pazienti. Radiol Med. 2013;118:1240–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pignol J-P, Vu TT, Mitera G, Bosnic S, Verkooijen HM, Truong P. Prospective evaluation of severe skin toxicity and pain during postmastectomy radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol Biol. 2015;91:157–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Piper ML, Roussel LO, Koltz PF, Wang F, Singh K, Chin R, Sbitany H, Langstein HN. Characterizing infections in prosthetic breast reconstruction: a validity assessment of national health databases. Br J Plast Surg. 2017;70:1345–53.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Baschnagel AM, Shah C, Wilkinson JB, Dekhne N, Arthur DW, Vicini FA. Failure rate and cosmesis of immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction after postmastectomy irradiation. Clin Breast Cancer. 2012;12:428–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Momoh AO, Cohen WA, Kidwell KM, Hamill JB, Qi J, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG, Matros E. Tradeoffs associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women choosing breast reconstruction: results of a prospective multicenter cohort. Ann Surg. 2017;266:158–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ho AY, Patel N, Ohri N, et al. Bilateral implant reconstruction does not affect the quality of postmastectomy radiation therapy. Med Dosim. 2014;39:18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hölscher T, Bentzen SM, Baumann M. Influence of connective tissue diseases on the expression of radiation side effects: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78:123–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ohri N, Cordeiro PG, Keam J, Ballangrud A, Shi W, Zhang Z, Nerbun CT, Woch KM, Stein NF, Zhou Y, McCormick B, Powell SN, Ay H, et al. Quantifying the impact of immediate reconstruction in postmastectomy radiation: a large, dose-volume histogram-based analysis. Radiat Oncol Biol. 2012;84:e153–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, McCormick B, VanZee K. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:877–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Moni J, Saleeby J, Bannon E, Lo Y-C, Fitzgerald TJ. Dosimetric impact of the AeroForm tissue expander in postmastectomy radiation therapy: an ex vivo analysis. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5:e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tran T, Ding W, Subramanian B, Melven L, Chao M, Farrow H, Baker C. A dosimetric analysis of the aeroformTM tissue expander in radiation therapy. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2014;2:020316–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lin A, Sharieff W, Juhasz J, Whelan T, Kim D-H. The benefit of deep inspiration breath hold: evaluating cardiac radiation exposure in patients after mastectomy and after breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer. 2016;24:86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zagar TM, Kaidar-Person O, Tang X, et al. Utility of deep inspiration breath hold for left-sided breast radiation therapy in preventing early cardiac perfusion defects: a prospective study. Radiat Oncol Biol. 2017;97:903–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zellars R, Bravo PE, Tryggestad E, Hopfer K, Myers L, Tahari A, Asrari F, Ziessman H, Garrett-Mayer E. SPECT analysis of cardiac perfusion changes after whole- breast/chest wall radiation therapy with or without active breathing coordinator: results of a randomized phase 3 trial. Radiat Oncol Biol. 2014;88:778–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Patel PM, Suciu S, Mortier L, et al. Extended schedule, escalated dose temozolomide versus dacarbazine in stage IV melanoma: final results of a randomised phase III study (EORTC 18032). Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:1476–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Pragmatic randomized trial of proton vs. photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: a Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RADCOMP) consortium trial – full text view – ClinicalTrials.gov.

  56. Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK, Aird EGA, et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:331–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Khan AJ, Poppe MM, Goyal S, et al. Hypofractionated postmastectomy radiation therapy is safe and effective: first results from a prospective phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2037–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hypofractionated radiation therapy after mastectomy in preventing recurrence in patients with stage IIa-IIIa breast cancer – full text view – ClinicalTrials.gov.

  59. Study of radiation Fractionation on Patient Outcomes After Breast REConstruction (FABREC) for invasive breast carcinoma – tabular view – ClinicalTrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov.

  60. Haviland JS, Owen JR, Dewar JA, et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1086–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Whelan TJ, Pignol J-P, Levine MN, et al. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:513–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Taylor ME, Haffty BG, Rabinovitch R, Arthur DW, Halberg FE, Strom EA, White JR, Cobleigh MA, Edge SB. ACR appropriateness criteria on postmastectomy radiotherapy expert panel on radiation oncology-breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(4):997–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Thomas K, Rahimi A, Spangler A, Anderson J, Garwood D. Radiation practice patterns among United States radiation oncologists for postmastectomy breast reconstruction and oncoplastic breast reduction. PRRO. 2014;4:466–71.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mayadev J, Einck J, Elson S, et al. Practice patterns in the delivery of radiation therapy after mastectomy among the University of California Athena Breast Health Network. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15:43–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean L. Wright .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Singer, L., Wright, J.L. (2019). Considerations for Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy in the Setting of Breast Reconstruction. In: Wright, J. (eds) Toxicities of Radiation Treatment for Breast Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11620-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11620-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11619-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11620-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics