Skip to main content

Guidelines for Process Selection

  • Chapter

Abstract

AM processes, like all materials processing, are constrained by material properties, speed, cost, and accuracy. The performance capabilities of materials and machines lag behind conventional manufacturing technology (e.g., injection molding machinery), although the lag is decreasing. Speed and cost, in terms of time to market, are where AM technology contributes, particularly for complex or customized geometries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wohlers T (2013) State of the industry—2013 Worldwide progress report, Wohlers Associates, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hazelrigg G (1996) Systems engineering: an approach to information-based design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mistree F, Smith WF, Bras BA (1993) A decision-based approach to concurrent engineering. In: Paresai HR, Sullivan W (eds) Handbook of concurrent engineering. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 127–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Marston M, Allen JK, Mistree F (2000) The decision support problem technique: integrating descriptive and normative approaches. Eng Valuation Cost Anal, Special Issue on Decisions-Based Design: Status and Promise 3:107–129

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mistree F, Smith WF, Bras BA, Allen JK, Muster D (1990) Decision-based design: a contemporary paradigm for ship design. Trans Soc Naval Arch Marine Eng 98:565–597

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bascaran E, Bannerot RB, Mistree F (1989) Hierarchical selection decision support problems in conceptual design. Eng Optim 14:207–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deglin A, Bernard A (2000) A knowledge-based environment for modelling and computer-aided process planning of rapid manufacturing processes, CE’2000 conference, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuh JYH, Loh HT, Wong YS, Shi DP, Mahesh M, Chong TS (2002) A web-based database system for RP machines, processes, and materials selection, Chap 2. In: Gibson I (ed) Software solutions for RP. Professional Engineering, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xu F, Wong YS, Loh HT (1999) A knowledge-based decision support system for RP&M process selection. In: Proceedings solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, Aug 9–11

    Google Scholar 

  11. Allen JK (1996) The decision to introduce new technology: the fuzzy preliminary selection decision support problem. Eng Optim 26(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams CB (2007) Design and development of a layer-based additive manufacturing process for the realization of metal parts of designed mesostructure, PhD dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herrmann A, Allen JK (1999) Selection of rapid tooling materials and processes in a distributed design environment. ASME design for manufacturing conference, paper #DETC99/DFM-8930, Las Vegas, Sept. 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  14. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) The theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Luce RD, Raiffa H (1957) Games and decisions. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Savage LJ (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandez MG, Seepersad CC, Rosen DW, Allen JK, Mistree F (2001) Utility-based decision support for selection in engineering design. ASME design automation conference, paper #DETC2001/DAC-21106, Pittsburgh, Sept. 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thurston DL (1991) A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes. Res Eng Des 3(2):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson J, Rosen DW (2005) Selection for rapid manufacturing under epistemic uncertainty. Proceedings ASME design automation conference, paper DETC2005/DFMLC-85264, Long Beach, Sept. 24–28

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosen DW, Gibson I (2002) Decision support and system selection for RP, Chapter 4. In: Gibson I (ed) Software solutions for RP. Professional Engineering, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosen DW (2005) Direct digital manufacturing: issues and tools for making key decisions. Proceedings SME rapid prototyping and manufacturing conference, Dearborn, May 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dutta D, Prinz FB, Rosen D, Weiss L (2001) Layered manufacturing: current status and future trends. ASME J Comput Inf Sci Eng 1(1):60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B. (2015). Guidelines for Process Selection. In: Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2112-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2113-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics