Skip to main content

Terminal Care: Goal Setting — Hospice Philosophy in Practice

  • Chapter
  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

A variety of services specializing in the care of the dying, dealing mostly with cancer patients, have recently expanded rapidly in the UK and the USA (Lunt and Hillier, 1981; Buckingham and Lupa, 1982). Whilst domiciliary and hospital teams, working in an advisory capacity and supplementing existing provision, continue to multiply (Lunt, in press) further major expansion of inpatient hospice units seems unlikely, at least in the UK. Instead, hospices are urged to disseminate the principles and techniques of terminal care to improve the care provided by other existing services (Wilkes et al., 1980). There has been surprisingly little research to demonstrate the effectiveness of hospice care, though more is under way. All published evaluative studies in Britain refer to St Christopher’s Hospice (Parkes, Part 1 and 2, 1979; Hinton, 1979; Parkes, 1984). Home care services have been subject to even less study (Parkes, 1980). There has to date been no evidence that education and training in terminal care skills for staff in non-specialist settings, by itself produces improvements in care, though recent research at St Christopher’s shows that standards of pain control have improved in nearby hospitals since the hospice opened (Parkes, 1984).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Goldiamond, I., 1974, Towards a constructional approach to social problems, Behaviorism, 2:1–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, E. R., and Lunt, B., 1980, Goal setting in terminal cancer, in: The continuing care of terminal cancer patients, R. G. Twycross, and V. Ventafridda, eds., Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, J., 1979, Comparison of places and policies for terminal care, The Lancet, i:29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastenbaum, R., 1968, Perspectives on the development and modification of behavior in the aged: a developmental -field perspective, Gerontologist, 8:280–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiresuk, T. J., and Sherman, R. E., 1968, Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs, Community Mental Health J., 4:443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, B., and Hillier, R., 1981, Terminal care: present services and future priorities, Br. Med. J., 283:595–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, B., in press, Terminal cancer care services -recent changes in regional inequalities in Great Britain, Soc. Sci. and Med.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, B., and Jenkins, J., 1983, Goal-setting in terminal care: a method of recording treatment aims and priorities, J. Advanced Nursing, 8:495–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, B., in preparation, A comparison of doctors’ and nurses’ care goals in hospice and hospital settings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, C. M., 1979, Terminal care: evaluation of inpatient services at St Christopher’s Hospice. Part I -views of surviving spouse on effects on the patient, Post grad. Med. J., 55:517–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, C. M., 1979, Terminal care: evaluation of inpatient services at St Christopher’s Hospice. Part II -self assessments of effects of the service on surviving spouses, Post grad. Med. J., 55:523–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, C. M., 1984, Hospice versus hospital care -re-evaluation after 10 years as seen by surviving spouses, Post grad. Med. J., 60:120–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, M. S., and Shearer, D. E., The Portage Project: a model for early childhood education, Exceptional Children, 38:210-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, E., Harnet, G., Speed, D. E. M., and Meyrick, R. L., 1980, National terminal care policy: report of the working group on terminal care, J. Roy. Coll. GPs., 30:466–471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lunt, B. (1987). Terminal Care: Goal Setting — Hospice Philosophy in Practice. In: Karas, E. (eds) Current Issues in Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6778-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6778-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-6780-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6778-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics