Skip to main content

Elaborative Interrogation and Facilitation of Fact Learning: Why Having a Knowledge Base Is One Thing and Using It Is Quite Another

  • Chapter
Book cover Interactions Among Aptitudes, Strategies, and Knowledge in Cognitive Performance

Abstract

Debates about the relative roles of strategies and the nonstrategic knowledge base in mediating proficient cognition have raged during this decade (e.g., Pressley, Borkowski, & Schneider, 1987; Schneider & Pressley, 1989, especially chapters 3 and 4); these controversies are detailed in several chapters of this volume. The position assumed in this chapter is that the simple effects of strategies and nonstrategic prior knowledge alone are often inadequate to produce proficient performance. We believe that strategies and prior knowledge often complement each other to produce competent performance and specifically that efficient cognition can be engineered by promoting use of strategies and prior knowledge. Evidence produced in our laboratory at the University of Western Ontario substantiates that executing strategies to access relevant prior knowledge can dramatically affect learning. (See Pressley et al. [1987] and Schneider & Pressley [1989, especially chapters 3, 4, 6, & 7] for consideration of other interactive relations between strategies and prior knowledge.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alvermann, D. E., Smith, L. C., & Readence, J. E. (1985). Prior knowledge activation and the comprehension of compatible and incompatible text. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 420–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 243–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., & Biddle, W. B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9) (pp. 90–132). New York. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andre, T. (1987). Questions and learning from reading. Questioning Exchange, 1, 47–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuhring, T., & Kee, D. W. (1987). Developmental relationships among metamemory, elaborative strategy use, and associative memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44, 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Stein, B. S., Vye, N. J., Franks, J. J., Auble, P. M., Mezynski, K. J., & Perfetto, G. A. (1982). Differences in approaches to learning: An overview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 390–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. III, Cognitive development (pp. 177–266). New York: J Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Smiley, S. S., Day, J. D., Townsend, M. A. R., & Lawton, S. C. (1977). Intrusion of a thematic idea in children’s comprehension and retention of stories. Child Development, 48, 1454–1466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, (2nd ed). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 269–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewitz, P., Carr, E. M., & Patberg, J. P. (1987). Effects of inference training on comprehension and comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M., & Holyoak, K. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M., & Holyoak, K. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. A., & Tierney, R. J. (1982). Developing readers knowledge through analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 256–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homaker, C. (1986). The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 212–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, D. W., & Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1974). Response and associative phase components of elaborative prompts in children’s noun-pair learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 18, 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemler, D. G., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1975). A developmental study of facilitation by mnemonic instruction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 400–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. & Pressley, M. (1981). Improving children’s prose comprehension: Selected strategies that seem to succeed. In C. M. Santa & B. L. Hayes (Eds.), Children’s prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 44–71). Newark DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, M. Y. (1983). The influence of religious affiliation on children’s memory for text information. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 448–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E., & Pressley, M. (in press). Picture versus question elaboration on young children’s learning of sentences containing high and low probability content. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omanson, R. C., Warren, W. H., & Trabasso, T. (1978). Goals, themes, inferences and memory: A developmental study. Discourse Processes, 1, 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1982). The empirical evidence for dual coding. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory, and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio (pp. 307–332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. D., Hansen, J., & Gordon, C. (1979). The effect of background knowledge on young children’s comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichert, J. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (1982). Elaboration and memory development. Child Development, 53, 296–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta & G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of child development, (Vol. 5) (pp. 89–129), New York: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Bryant, S. L. (1982). Does answering questions really promote associative learning? Child Development, 53, 1258–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Levin, J. R. (1977). Developmental differences in subjects’ associative learning strategies and performance: Assessing a hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 431–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., Kuiper, N. A., Bryant, S. L., & Michener, S. (1982). Mnemonic versus nonmnemonic vocabulary-learning strategies: Additional comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 693–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., McDaniel, M. A., Turnure, J. E., Wood, E., & Ahmad, M. (1987). Generation and precision of elaboration: Effects on intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Symons, S., McDaniel, M. A., Snyder, B. L., & Turnure, J. E. (1988). Elaborative interrogation facilitates acquisition of confusing facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 268–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D., & Finn, C. E. (1987). What do our 17-year-olds know? New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, D. L., & Rousseau, E. W. (1981). A meta-analysis of experimental research in teacher questioning behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, M. G. (1976). The relationship of uniqueness of prose passages to the effect of question placement and question relevance on acquisition and retention of information. In W. D. Miller & G. H. McNinch (Eds.), Reflections and investigations of reading, 25th National Reading Conference Yearbook. Clemson SC: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, W. D., Jr., & Bean, J. P. (1973). Sentence effects and noun-pair learning: A developmental interaction during adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B. (1984). Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 371–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowls, M. D. (1976). The facilitative and interactive effects of adjunct questions on retention of eighth graders across three prose passages: Dissertation in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1989). Memory development between 2 and 20. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, C. M., Abelson, R. P., & McKoon, G. (1986). The role of thematic knowledge structures in reminding. In J. A. Galambos, R. P. Abelson, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Knowledge structures (pp. 185–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slamecka, N. J., & Fevreiski, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, M. S., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. S., & Bransford, J. D. (1979). Constraints on effective elaboration: Effects of precision and subject generation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 769–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. S., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Owings, R. A., Vye, N. J., & McGraw, W. (1982). Differences in the precision of self-generated elaborations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. S., Littlefield, J., Bransford, J. D., & Persampieri, M. (1984). Elaboration and knowledge acquisition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 522–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, G. H. (1973). The ‘arousal’ effect of adjunct questions on recall from prose materials. Australian Journal of Psychology, 25, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woloshyn, V., & Pressley, M. (1988). Unpublished manuscript. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., Pressley, M., Turnure, J. E., & Walton, R. (1987). Enriching children’s recall of picture-dictionary definitions with interrogation and elaborated pictures. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 35, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. J., Winne, P., & Pressley, M. (1988). Elaborative interrogation, imagery, and provided precise elaborations as facilitators of children’s learning of arbitrary prose. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. A. (1966). The art of memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. (1990). Elaborative Interrogation and Facilitation of Fact Learning: Why Having a Knowledge Base Is One Thing and Using It Is Quite Another. In: Schneider, W., Weinert, F.E. (eds) Interactions Among Aptitudes, Strategies, and Knowledge in Cognitive Performance. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3268-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3268-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7942-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3268-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics