This brief exchange took place in an urban school classroom in the northeastern United States. To many early childhood educators across the globe, this story is all too familiar. The current push for educational accountability and reform has only reinforced what Eisner (2006) calls the “production vision of education” (p. 3), wherein schools are expected to work with assembly-line efficiency to achieve a prescribed set of outcomes. Although most education professionals would contest the view that our work with young children is only “important for the test,” we have yet to articulate an alternative vision to guide our collaborative efforts. Secure in the assumption that it is important to promote young children's language, literacy, and learning, we do not typically step back to examine why this work is important; instead, we jump ahead to search for methods and techniques that align with the most recent mandate. As Eisner points out, “We often pursue aims and engage in practices that have become a deep part of our sub-consciousness without ever making them conscious” (p. 4). To make sense of the current state of our field and envision its future development, we must delve into the sea of meaning underlying our everyday work in classrooms, administrative offices, and universities. In other words, we must consider what we mean when we talk about “language,” “literacy,” and “learning.” This requires that we reflect on the varieties and uses of language, interrogate what it means to be literate, and develop our own understanding of why learning is of value to the child and to the society as a whole.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
de Saint Exupéry, A. (1943/1971).The little prince. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc
Dewey, J. (1934/1980).Art as experience. New York: Perigee
Dyson, A. H. (1993).Social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College Press
Dyson, A. H. (2003).The brothers and sisters learn to write: Popular literacies in childhood and school culturesM. New York: Teachers College Press
Dyson, A. H. (2004). Diversity as a “handful”: Toward retheorizing the basics.Research in the Teaching of English39(2), 210–214
Edwards, C. P., Gandini, L. & Forman, G. E. (Eds.) (1998).The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Approach — Advanced Reflections(2nd ed.). Greenwich, CT: Ablex
Eisner, E. W. (1978). Reading and the creation of meaning. In E. W Eisner (Ed.)Reading, the arts, and the creation of meaning(pp. 13–31). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association
Eisner, E. W. (1994).Cognition and curriculum reconsidered(2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press
Eisner, E. W. (2002).The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Eisner, E. W. (2006).Two visions of education. (The Arts Education Collaborative Monograph No. 2). Pittsburgh, PA: Arts Education Collaborative
Gallas, K. (1994).The languages of learning: How children talk, write, dance, and sing their understanding of the world. New York: Teachers College Press
Harste, J. C. (2000). Six points of departure. In B. Berghoff, K. A. Eawa, J. C. Harste, & B. T. Hoonan (Eds.)Beyond reading and writing: Inquiry, curriculum, and multiple ways of knowing(pp. 1–16). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
Heath, S. B., & Wolf, S. A. (2005). Focus in creative learning: Drawing on art for language development.Literacy39(1), 38–45
Kress, G. R. (1997).Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge
Kress, G. R. (2003).Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge
Maluguzzi, L. (1998). No way. The hundredisthere. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.)The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach—advanced reflections(pp. 2–3). Greenwich, CT: Ablex
Millard, E., & Marsh, J. (2001). Words with pictures: The role of visual literacy in writing and its implication for schoolingReading35(2), 54—61
National Council of Teachers of English. (2005). Multimodal literacies. Retrieved March 2, 2008 fromhttp://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/literacy/123213.htm
Olson, J. L. (1992).Envisioning writing: Toward an integration of drawing and writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Narey, M.J. (2009). Introduction. In: Narey, M. (eds) Making Meaning. Educating the Young Child, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87539-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87539-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-87537-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-87539-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)