Abstract
Debridement is an essential part of chronic wound management. Various methods of debridement include sharp surgical (using a scalpel, scissors, curette, or other sharp instruments), mechanical (e.g., wet to dry or wet to moist gauze), biologic (i.e., maggots), high-pressure streams of water, autolytic, and enzymatic. Enzymatic debridement using clostridial collagenase ointment (CCO) offers several advantages over less selective methods including sparing normal healthy tissue and continuous rather than episodic debridement activity. Several studies in chronic nonischemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) have shown that CCO is at least equal to other methods of debridement in clearance of nonviable tissue and achieving a clean, granulated wound bed but is consistently better in terms of reducing ulcer size during the initial 4–6 weeks of use. Laboratory and clinical data also suggest that CCO promotes healing through stimulation of cellular migration and proliferation, angiogenesis, and modulation of the inflammatory status of DFU. Limited clinical data also indicate that the incidence of infection for DFU treated with CCO is no worse than for those treated with silver products and better than for those treated with non-active hydrogel dressings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA (2005) Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. J Am Med Assoc 293:217–228
Boulton AJ, Kirsner RS, Vileikyte L (2004) Clinical practice: neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. N Engl J Med 351:48–55
Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, Tredwell J, Boulton AJ (2003) Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort. Diabetes Care 26:1435–1438
Armstrong DG, Wrobel J, Robbins JM (2007) Are diabetes-related wounds and amputations worse than cancer? Int Wound J 4:286–287
Ramsey SD, Newton K, Blough D, McCulloch DK, Sandhu N, Reiber GE, Wagner EH (1999) Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 22:382–387
James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R, Pulcini E, Secor P, Sestrich J, Costerton JW, Stewart PS (2008) Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 16:37–44
Jimenez JC, Agnew PS, Mayer P, Clements JR, Caporusso JM, Lange DL, Dickerson JE, Slade HB (2017) Enzymatic debridement of chronic nonischemic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a randomized, controlled trial. Wounds 29:133–139
Boulton AJ (2008) The diabetic foot: grand overview, epidemiology and pathogenesis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 24(Suppl 1):S3–S6
Driver VR, Fabbi M, Lavery LA, Gibbons G (2010) The costs of diabetic foot: the economic case for the limb salvage team. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 100:335–341
Robbins JM, Strauss G, Aron D, Long J, Kuba J, Kaplan Y (2008) Mortality rates and diabetic foot ulcers: is it time to communicate mortality risk to patients with diabetic foot ulceration? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98:489–493
Tentolouris N, Al-Sabbagh S, Walker MG, Boulton AJ, Jude EB (2004) Mortality in diabetic and nondiabetic patients after amputations performed from 1990 to 1995: a 5-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care 27:1598–1604
Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J (2005) The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet 366:1719–1724
Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG (2003) Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet 361:1545–1551
Halim AS, Khoo TL, Saad AZ (2012) Wound bed preparation from a clinical perspective. Indian J Plast Surg 45:193–202
Mat Saad AZ, Khoo TL, Halim AS (2013) Wound bed preparation for chronic diabetic foot ulcers. ISRN Endocrinol 2013:608313
Steed DL (2004) Debridement. Am J Surg 187:71S–74S
Edwards J, Stapley S (2010) Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD003556
Falanga V (2004) The chronic wound: impaired healing and solutions in the context of wound bed preparation. Blood Cells Mol Dis 32:88–94
Collagenase SANTYL® Ointment (package insert) (2014) Fort Worth, TX: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Greene JA, Podolsky SH (2012) Reform, regulation, and pharmaceuticals—the Kefauver–Harris amendments at 50. N Engl J Med 367:1481–1483
Vrabec R, Moserova J, Konickova Z, Behounkova E, Blaha J (1974) Clinical experience with enzymatic debridement of burned skin with the use of collagenase. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 18:496–498
Hansbrough JF, Achauer B, Dawson J, Himel H, Luterman A, Slater H, Levonson S, Salzberg CA, Hansbrough WB, Dore C (1995) Wound healing in partial-thickness burn wounds treated with collagenase ointment versus silver sulfadiazine cream. J Burn Care Rehabil 16:241–247
Soroff HS, Sasvary DH (1994) Collagenase ointment and polymyxin B sulfate/bacitracin spray versus silver sulfadiazine cream in partial-thickness burns: a pilot study. J Burn Care Rehabil 15:13–17
Lee LK, Ambrus JL (1975) Collagenase therapy for decubitus ulcers. Geriatrics 30:91–93, 97–98
Rao DB, Sane PG, Georgiev EL (1975) Collagenase in the treatment of dermal and decubitus ulcers. J Am Geriatr Soc 23:22–30
Milne CT, Ciccarelli AO, Lassy M (2010) A comparison of collagenase to hydrogel dressings in wound debridement. Wounds 22:270–274
Haimovici H, Strauch B (1972) Use of collagenase in the management of stasis and ischemic ulcers of the lower extremities. In: Mandl I (ed) Collagenase. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, New York
Altman MI, Goldstein L, Horowitz S (1978) Collagenase: an adjunct to healing trophic ulcerations in the diabetic patient. J Am Podiatry Assoc 68:11–15
Tallis A, Motley TA, Wunderlich RP, Dickerson JE Jr, Waycaster C, Slade HB (2013) Clinical and economic assessment of diabetic foot ulcer debridement with collagenase: results of a randomized controlled study. Clin Ther 35:1805–1820
Saad AZ, Gordon I (2017) Clostridial collagenase for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: results of four randomized controlled trials. Wounds 29(10):297–305
Motley TA, Lange DL, Dickerson JE Jr, Slade HB (2014) Clinical outcomes associated with serial sharp debridement of diabetic foot ulcers with and without clostridial collagenase ointment. Wounds 26:57–64
Galperin RC, Lange DL, Ramsay SJ, Shi L, Weedon KA, Hudson NM, Dickerson JE Jr, Cargill DI, Slade HB (2015) Anti-inflammatory effects of clostridial collagenase: results from in vitro and clinical studies. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 105:509–519
Motley TA, Caporusso JM, Lange DL, Eichelkraut RA, Cargill DI, Dickerson JE Jr (2018) Clinical outcomes for diabetic foot ulcers treated with clostridial collagenase ointment or with a product containing silver. Adv Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2018.0784 Published Online: 16 April 2018
ClinicalTrials.gov. (2017) Wound edge changes following treatment with Santyl. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01197898?sect=X70156&term=Santyl&draw=2&rank=15#outcome1. Accessed 9 Sept 2017
Lebrun E, Tomic-Canic M, Kirsner RS (2010) The role of surgical debridement in healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 18:433–438
Pierce GF (2001) Inflammation in nonhealing diabetic wounds: the space-time continuum does matter. Am J Pathol 159:399–403
Riley KN, Herman IM (2005) Collagenase promotes the cellular responses to injury and wound healing in vivo. J Burns Wounds 4:112–124
Sheets AR, Demidova-Rice TN, Shi L, Ronfard V, Grover KV, Herman IM (2016) Identification and characterization of novel matrix-derived bioactive peptides: a role for collagenase from Santyl ointment in post-debridement wound healing? PLoS One 11(7):e0159598
Davidson JM, Dipietro L (2006) The wound healing process. In: Veves A, Giurini JM, FW LG (eds) The diabetic foot. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, p 59
Rappolee DA, Mark D, Banda MJ, Werb Z (1988) Wound macrophages express TGF-alpha and other growth factors in vivo: analysis by mRNA phenotyping. Science 241:708–712
Meszaros AJ, Reichner JS, Albina JE (1999) Macrophage phagocytosis of wound neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol 65:35–42
Kirsner RS, Katz MH, Eaglstein WH, Falanga V (1993) The biology of wound fluid. Wounds 5:122–128
Ferrante CJ, Leibovich SJ (2012) Regulation of macrophage polarization and wound healing. Adv Wound Care 1:10–16
Erwig L-P, Henson PM (2007) Immunological consequences of apoptotic cell phagocytosis. Am J Pathol 171:2–8
Payne WG, Salas RE, Ko F, Naidu DK, Donate G, Wright TE, Robson MC (2008) Enzymatic debriding agents are safe in wounds with high bacterial bioburdens and stimulate healing. Eplasty 8:151–156
Motley T, Lange D, Dickerson J, Slade H (2013) A randomized controlled trial of clostridial collagenase ointment used with sharp surgical debridement in the care of diabetic foot ulcers. Poster presented at Fall SAWC 2013. Symposium on Advanced Wound Care, Las Vegas, NV, 27–29 Sept 2013
ClinicalTrials.gov. (2007) Efficacy and safety study of EscharEx to treat (debride) hard to heal wounds. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02020746?term=enzymatic+AND+debride&rank=1. Accessed 9 Sept 2017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dickerson, J.E. (2018). Enzymatic Debridement of Chronic Nonischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers. In: Shiffman, M., Low, M. (eds) Pressure Injury, Diabetes and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. Recent Clinical Techniques, Results, and Research in Wounds, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2018_118
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2018_118
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10700-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10701-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)