Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Quality Evaluation of Maize-Based Fortified Nutritious Bar

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumers demand and desire health foods, which are portable, convenient and proportioned as well. Cereal bars have emerged as an attractive and innovative option for convenience food product. With this aim, energy bar samples were prepared using popped maize flour (12–22 %) in addition to other ingredients such as legume grits, soy protein. Three sweeteners viz. corn syrup (CS), honey (H) and jaggery (J) were used with 45, 50 and 55 % levels. The influence of level and type of sweetener was studied on colour characteristics, cutting strength and sensory characteristics. All the quality characteristics were significantly affected by type of sweetener except for taste score. Further, all the parameters except for aroma and yellowness index were also affected by level of sweetener. The sensory panellists rated the jaggery-based samples superior for all the sensory parameters. The cutting strength was highest for jaggery-based samples. Based upon the sensory evaluation, the sample having 17 % popped corn flour and 50 % jaggery was found most acceptable and analyzed for proximate composition. 100 g of optimised corn-based energy bar provided 9.2 g fat, 12.64 g protein, 3.14 g total minerals, 158.79 mg calcium, 4.114 mg iron and 414.4 kcal energy. The free fatty acid content and microbial load of the energy bar sample was within the acceptable limit for 3 months under refrigerated conditions. Thus, corn-based energy bar is a better choice for a quick meal or snack than a fast food meal and other highly processed packaged convenience foods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akeson WE, Stachman MA (1964) A pepsin-pancreatin digest index of protein quality evaluation. J Nutr 83:257–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. AOAC (2000) Official methods of analysis, 17th edn. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  3. BIS (1971) IS: 6273 Part I and Part II (1971) Guide for sensory evaluation of foods. Indian Standard Institution, Manak Bhawan, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burn D (2007) On the rise. Food Can 67(1):28–32

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cruickshank R, Duguid JP, Marmion BP, Swain RHA (1975) Medical microbiology—the practice of medical microbiology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deshpande S, Bargale PC, Joshi KC, Singh V, Varghese S (2004) Enhancing the nutritive value of barley based sattu by soy fortification. Ind J Nutr Dietet 41(4):146–159

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaeger SR, Meiselman HL (2004) Perceptions of meal convenience: the case of at home evening meals. Appetite 42(2004):317–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mridula D, Rita J, Singh KK (2010) Effect of storage on quality of fortified bengal gram sattu. J Food Sci Technol 47(1):119–123

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mridula D, Singh KK, Barnwal P (2011) Development of omega-3 rich energy bar with flaxseed. J Food Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0425-x

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagaraj G (2009) Oilseeds-properties, processing, products and procedures. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parker ML, Grant A, Rigby NM, Belton PS, Taylor JRN (1999) Effect of popping on the endosperm cell walls of sorghum and maize. J Cereal Sci 30:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reddy NS, Kamble RM, Khan TNI (1991) Evaluation of nutritional quality of maize and maize products. Ind J Nutr Dietet 98:90–94

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roberfroid MB (1999) Concepts in functional foods: the case of inulin and oligofructose. J Nutr 129:1398s–1401s

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sacilik K, Ozturk R, Keskin R (2003) Some physical proprieties of hemp seed. Biosyst Engg 86(2):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma M, Kadam DM, Chadha S, Wilson RA, Gupta RK (2013) Influence of particle size on physical & sensory attributes of mango pulp powder. Int Agrophysics 27:323–328. doi:10.2478/intag-2013-0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thakur BR, Arya SS (1990) Packaging requirements and stability of fried wheat snacks (Trisnacks). J Food Sci Technol 27(2):76–81

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thapar VK, Sehgal VK, Shashi P (1988) Post harvest quality analysis of food grains—research bulletin. Department of Processing and Agricultural Structures, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, pp 13–14

    Google Scholar 

  18. WHO (2005) World Health Organization: vitamin a deficiency document. http://www.who.int/nut/vad.htm. Accessed 14 July 2011

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, M., Mridula, D. Development and Quality Evaluation of Maize-Based Fortified Nutritious Bar. Agric Res 4, 93–101 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-014-0140-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-014-0140-8

Keywords

Navigation