Abstract
Multi-criteria decision-making methods support decision makers in all stages of the decision-making process by providing useful data. However, criteria are not always certain as uncertainty is a feature of the real world. MCDM methods under uncertainty and fuzzy systems are accepted as suitable techniques in conflicting problems that cannot be represented by numerical values, in particular in energy analysis and planning. In this paper, a modified TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision-making with qualitative linguistic labels is proposed. This method addresses uncertainty considering different levels of precision. Each decision maker’s judgment on the performance of alternatives with respect to each criterion is expressed by qualitative linguistic labels. The new method takes into account linguistic data provided by the decision makers without any previous aggregation. Decision maker judgments are incorporated into the proposed method to generate a complete ranking of alternatives. An application in energy planning is presented as an illustrative case example in which energy policy alternatives are ranked. Seven energy alternatives under nine criteria were evaluated according to the opinion of three environmental and energy experts. The weights of the criteria are determined by fuzzy AHP, and the alternatives are ranked using qualitative TOPSIS. The proposed approach is compared with a modified fuzzy TOPSIS method, showing the advantages of the proposed approach when dealing with linguistic assessments to model uncertainty and imprecision. Although the new approach requires less cognitive effort to decision makers, it yields similar results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afsordegan A, Sánchez M, Agell N, Aguado JC, Gamboa G (2016) Absolute order-of-magnitude reasoning applied to a social multi-criteria evaluation framework. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 28(1–2):261–274
Agell N, Sánchez M, Prats F, Roselló L (2012) Ranking multi-attribute alternatives on the basis of linguistic labels in group decisions. Inf Sci 209:49–60
Akash BA, Mamlook R, Mohsen MS (1999) Multi-criteria selection of electric power plants using analytical hierarchy process. Electr Power Syst Res 52(1):29–35
Amiri MP (2010) Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:6218–6224
Aras H, Erdomu S, Koç E (2004) Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process. Renew Energy 29:1383–1392
Ashtiani B, Haghighirad F, Makui A, Montazer GA (2009) Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 9(2):457–461
Baños R, Manzano-Agugliaro F, Montoya F, Gil C, Alcayde A, Gómez J (2011) Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(4):1753–1766
Beccali M, Cellura M, Ardente D (1998) Decision making in energy planning: the ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach compared to a FUZZY-SETS methodology. Energy Convers Manag 39(16–18):1869–1881
Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2003) Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renew Energy 28(13):2063–2087
Begic F, Afgan N (2007) Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system—Bosnian case. Energy 32:1979–1985
Behzadian M, Khanmohammadi Otaghsara S, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069
Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publications, Boston
Boran F, Boran K, Menlik T (2012) The evaluation of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation in turkey using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Energy Sources Part B 7(1):81–90
Buehring W, Foell W, Keeney R (1978) Examining energy/environment policy using decision analysis. Energy Policy 2(3):341–367
Carlsson C, Fuller R (1996) Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: recent developments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:139–153
Cavallaro F (2010a) A comparative assessment of thin-film photovoltaic production processes using the ELECTRE III method. Energy Policy 38(1):463–474
Cavallaro F (2010b) Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for assessing thermal-energy storage in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems. Appl Energy 87(2):496–503
Chang NB, Parvathinathan G, Breeden JB (2008) Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. J Environ Manag 87(1):139–153
Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9
Cherubini F, Strømman AH (2011) Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour Technol 102(2):437–451
Choo EU, Schoner B, Wedley WC (1999) Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision making. Comput Ind Eng 37(3):527–541
Dai J, Qi J, Chi J, Chen S, Yang J (2010) Integrated water resource security evaluation of Beijing based on GRA and TOPSIS. Front Earth Sci China 4(3):357–362
Doukas H, Andreas BM, Psarras JE (2007) Multi-criteria decision aid for the formulation of sustainable technological energy priorities using linguistic variables. Eur J Oper Res 182(2):844–855
Doukas H, Karakosta C, Psarras J (2010) Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Syst Appl 37(7):5491–5497
Doumpos M, Grigoroudis E (2013) Multicriteria decision aid and artificial intelligence: links, theory and applications. Wiley, Hoboken
Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Academic press, New York
Evans TJ, Strezov V, Annette E (2009) Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:1062–1088
Forbus K (1984) Qualitative process theory. Artif Intell 24(1–3):85–168
Georgopoulou E, Sarafidis Y, Diakoulaki D (1998) Design and implementation of a group DSS for sustaining renewable energies exploitation. Eur J Oper Res 109:483–500
Goumas M, Lygerou V (2000) An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. Eur J Oper Res 123(3):606–613
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L (2008) A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(2):354–370
Hwang C, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, a state of the art survey, vol 1. Springer, Berlin
Hwang C, Yoon K (2005) Multiple attribute decision making. Quant Appl Soc Sci 7–104:53–62
Ishizaka A, Nemery P (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. Wiley, Hoboken
Jebaraj S, Iniyan S (2006) A review of energy models. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 10(4):281–311
Jing YY, Bai H, Wang JJ (2012) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for CCHP systems driven by different energy sources. Energy Policy 42:286–296
Kablan M (2004) Decision support for energy conservation promotion. Energy Policy 32(10):1151–1158
Kahraman C (2008) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: theory and applications with recent developments. Springer, New York
Kahraman C, Cebi S, Kaya I (2010) Selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design: the case of Turkey. J Univers Comput Sci 16(1):82–102
Kara SS, Onut S (2010) A stochastic optimization approach for paper recycling reverse logistics network design under uncertainty. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(4):717–730
Karimi AR, Mehrdadi N, Hashemian SJ, Nabi Bidhendi G, Tavakkoli Moghadam R (2011) Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(2):267–280
Kaya I, Kahraman C (2011) Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6577–6585
Kowkabi L, Setayesh SR, Badri A, Rajaee A (2013) The application of fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making to prioritize the landscapes with high ecological value: Khoshk river in Shiraz. Int J Environ Res 7(2):423–434
Kuo RJ, Hsu CW, Chen YL (2015) Integration of fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers. Int J Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13762-015-0819-9
Laarhoven V, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1–3):199–227
Liu KFR (2007) Evaluating environmental sustainability: an integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic. Environ Manag 39(5):721–736
Loken E (2007) Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(7):1584–1595
Meier PM, Hobbs BF (1994) Multicriteria methods for resource planning: an experimental comparison. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9(4):1811–1817
Moghaddam NB, Nasiri M, Mousavi SM (2011) An appropriate multiple criteria decision making method for solving electricity planning problems, addressing sustainability issue. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(3):605–620
Mosadeghi R, Warnken J, Tomlinson R, Mirfenderesk H (2015) Comparison of fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Comput Environ Urban Syst 49:54–65
Nieto-Morote A, Ruz-Vila F, Cánovas-Rodríguez F (2010) Selection of a trigeneration system using a fuzzy AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach. Int J Energy Res 35:781–794
Nigim K, Munier N, Green J (2004) Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources. Renew Energy 29(11):1775–1791
Oberschmidt J, Geldermann J, Ludwig J, Schmehl M (2010) Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies. Int J Energy Sect Manag 4(2):183–212
Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455
Pan J, Rahman S (1998) Multiattribute utility analysis with imprecise information: an enhanced decision support technique for the evaluation of electric generation expansion strategies. Electr Power Syst Res 46(2):101–109
Parreiras RO, Ekel PY, Martini JSC, Palhares RM (2010) A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments. Inf Sci 180(7):1075–1089
Pohekar S, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 8(4):365–381
Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos D, Munda G, Vreeker R (2006) Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources Part B 1(2):181–193
Rovere E, Soares J, Oliveira L, Lauria T (2010) Sustainable expansion of electricity sector: sustainability indicators as an instrument to support decision making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:422–429
Russo R, Camanho R (2015) Criteria in AHP: a systematic review of literature. Procedia Comput Sci 55:1123–1132
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL (1990) Decision making by the analytic hierarchy process: theory and applications. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26
San Cristóbal J (2012) A goal programming model for the optimal mix and location of renewable energy plants in the north of Spain. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(7):4461–4464
Stamford L, Azapagic A (2011) Sustainability indicators for the assessment of nuclear power. Energy 36:6037–6057
Streimikiene D, Balezentis T, Krisciukaitien I, Balezentis A (2012) Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: mCDM approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):3302–3311
Topcu Y, Ulengin F (2004) Energy for the future: an integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey. Energy 29(1):137–154
Travé-Massuyès L, Prats F, Sánchez M, Agell N (2005) Relative and absolute order-of-magnitude models unified. Ann Math Artif Intell 45(3–4):323–341
Tsoutsos T, Drandaki M, Frantzeskaki N, Iosifidis E, Kiosses I (2009) Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete. Energy Policy 37(5):1587–1600
Tuzkaya G, Ozgen A, Ozgen D, Tuzkaya UR (2009) Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6(3):477–490
Tzeng GH, Ta Shiau, Lin CY (1992) Application of multicriteria decision making to the evaluation of new energy system development in Taiwan. Energy 17(10):983–992
Varun S, Bhat IK, Prakash R (2009) LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:1067–1073
Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, Shi GH, Zhang XT (2008) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system. Energy Policy 36(10):3823–3832
Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, Zhao JH (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2263–2278
Yeh TM, Huang YL (2014) Factors in determining wind farm location: integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP. Renew Energy 66:159–169
Yilmaz B, Dadeviren M (2011) A combined approach for equipment selection: F-PROMETHEE method and zeroone goal programming. Expert Syst Appl 38(9):11641–11650
Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353
Zadeh L (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8(3):199–249
Acknowledgments
This research was partially supported by the SENSORIAL research Project (TIN2010-20966-C02-01 and TIN2010-20966-C02-02), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Information Technology. Partial support was also provided by a doctoral fellowship awarded to one of the authors at the ESADE Business School, with additional support from Ramon Llull University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Afsordegan, A., Sánchez, M., Agell, N. et al. Decision making under uncertainty using a qualitative TOPSIS method for selecting sustainable energy alternatives. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 1419–1432 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-0982-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-0982-7