Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Worksite Environmental Interventions for Obesity Prevention and Control: Evidence from Group Randomized Trials

  • Obesity Prevention (A Must, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Obesity Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Worksites provide multiple advantages to prevent and treat obesity and to test environmental interventions to tackle its multiple causal factors. We present a literature review of group-randomized and non-randomized trials that tested worksite environmental, multiple component interventions for obesity prevention and control paying particular attention to the conduct of formative research prior to intervention development. The evidence on environmental interventions on measures of obesity appears to be strong since most of the studies have a low (4/8) and unclear (2/8) risk of bias. Among the studies reviewed whose potential risk of bias was low, the magnitude of the effect was modest and sometimes in the unexpected direction. None of the four studies describing an explicit formative research stage with clear integration of findings into the intervention was able to demonstrate an effect on the main outcome of interest. We present alternative explanation for the findings and recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Weinsier RL, Hunter GR, Heini AF, Goran MI, Sell SM. The etiology of obesity: relative contribution of metabolic factors, diet, and physical activity. Am J Med. 1998;105(2):145–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2012;307(5):491–7. This study decribes the prevalence of overweight and obesity by age, gender, and race groups based on a nationally representative sample of the non-institutionalized population in the US with objective measures of body fat.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10(4):282–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Egger G, Swinburn B, Rossner S. Dusting off the epidemiological triad: could it work with obesity? Obes Rev. 2003;4(2):115–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glass TA, McAtee MJ. Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: extending horizons, envisioning the future. Social Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1650–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neel JV. Diabetes mellitus: a "thrifty" genotype rendered detrimental by "progress"? 1962. Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(8):694–703. discussion 692-693.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill JO, Peters JC. Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science. 1998;280(5368):1371–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. French SA, Story M, Jeffery RW. Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Ann Rev Publ Health. 2001;22:309–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Booth KM, Pinkston MM, Poston WS. Obesity and the built environment. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(5 Suppl 1):S110–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Melanson EL. Genetic and environmental contributions to obesity. Med Clin N Am. 2000;84(2):333–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swinburn BA, Caterson I, Seidell JC, James WP. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of excess weight gain and obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(1A):123–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F. Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med. 1999;29(6 Pt 1):563–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Cancer Institute. Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice. NIH Publication No. 05-3896, 2005.

  15. Leblanc ES, O'Connor E, Whitlock EP, Patnode CD, Kapka T. Effectiveness of primary care-relevant treatments for obesity in adults: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):434–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14(1):32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Finkelstein EA, DiBonaventura M, Burgess SM, Hale BC. The costs of obesity in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(10):971–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johns G. Prsenteeism in the workplace: a review and a research agenda. J Organ Behav. 2010;31(4):519–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goetzel RZ, Gibson TB, Short ME, et al. A multi-worksite analysis of the relationships among body mass index, medical utilization, and worker productivity. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52 Suppl 1:S52–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koh HK, Sebelius KG. Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(14):1296–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Forum WHOWE. The Workplace as a Setting for Interventions to Improve Diet and Promote Physical Activity. Background paper prepared for the WHO/WEF joint event on preventing noncommunicable diseases in the workplace. Dalian/China. September, 2007.

  22. Fabius RJFSG. Workplace-based health and wellness services. In: Pronk N, editor. ACSm's worksite health handbook: a guide to building healthy and productive companies. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. O'Donnell MM T, Harris J. Design of workplace health promotion programs. In: OD MP, editor. Health promotion in the workplace. Toronto: Delmar Thomson Learning; 2002. p. 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Economics News Release. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t01.htm. Accessed September 2013.

  25. Lemon SC, Pratt CA. Worksite environmental interventions for obesity control: an overview. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52 Suppl 1:S1–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pratt CA, Fernandez ID, Stevens VJ. Introduction and overview of worksite studies. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15 Suppl 1:1S–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pratt CA, Lemon SC, Fernandez ID, et al. Design characteristics of worksite environmental interventions for obesity prevention. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(9):2171–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Andersen RE, Franckowiak SC, Snyder J, Bartlett SJ, Fontaine KR. Can inexpensive signs encourage the use of stairs? Results from a community intervention. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(5):363–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Boutelle KN, Jeffery RW, Murray DM, Schmitz MK. Using signs, artwork, and music to promote stair use in a public building. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(12):2004–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. French SA, Jeffery RW, Story M, et al. Pricing and promotion effects on low-fat vending snack purchases: the CHIPS Study. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(1):112–7.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. French SA, Jeffery RW, Story M, Hannan P, Snyder MP. A pricing strategy to promote low-fat snack choices through vending machines. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(5):849–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeffery RW, French SA, Raether C, Baxter JE. An environmental intervention to increase fruit and salad purchases in a cafeteria. Prev Med. 1994;23(6):788–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kerr J, Eves F, Carroll D. Six-month observational study of prompted stair climbing. Prev Med. 2001;33(5):422–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Abrams DB, Boutwell WB, Grizzle J, Heimendinger J, Sorensen G, Varnes J. Cancer control at the workplace: the Working Well Trial. Prev Med. 1994;23(1):15–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Emmons KM, Linnan LA, Shadel WG, Marcus B, Abrams DB. The Working Healthy Project: a worksite health-promotion trial targeting physical activity, diet, and smoking. J Occup Environ Med. 1999;41(7):545–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Peterson K, et al. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the treatwell 5-a-day study. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(1):54–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Satariano WA, McAuley E. Promoting physical activity among older adults: from ecology to the individual. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25(3 Suppl 2):184–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Whiteford LM, Vitucci J. Pregnancy and addiction: Translating research into practice. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:1371–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ayala GX, Elder JP, Campbell NR, et al. Nutrition communication for a Latino community: formative research foundations. Fam Community Health. 2001;24(3):72–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gittelsohn J, Steckler A, Johnson CC, et al. Formative research in school and community-based health programs and studies: “state of the art” and the TAAG approach. Health Educ Behav Off Publ Soc Publ Health Educ. 2006;33(1):25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Denzin NKL, Y.S. Collecting and interpreting qualitative material. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.

  42. Singer M. Introduction to Syndemics: A Critical Systems Approach to Public and Community Health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cleland V, Ball K. What might work? Exploring the perceived feasibility of strategies to promote physical activity among women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Health Educ Res. 2013;28(2):205–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Anderson LM, Quinn TA, Glanz K, et al. The effectiveness of worksite nutrition and physical activity interventions for controlling employee overweight and obesity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(4):340–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Engbers LH, van Poppel MN, Chin APMJ, van Mechelen W. Worksite health promotion programs with environmental changes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(1):61–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Katz DL, O'Connell M, Yeh MC, et al. Public health strategies for preventing and controlling overweight and obesity in school and worksite settings: a report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control. Oct 7 2005;54(RR-10):1-12.

  47. Larson N, Story M. A review of environmental influences on food choices. Ann Behav Med Publ Soc Behav Med. 2009;38 Suppl 1:S56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Seymour JD, Yaroch AL, Serdula M, Blanck HM, Khan LK. Impact of nutrition environmental interventions on point-of-purchase behavior in adults: a review. Prev Med. 2004;39 Suppl 2:S108–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Thorndike AN. Workplace Interventions to Reduce Obesity and Cardiometabolic Risk. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2011;5(1):79–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Glanz K, Mullis RM. Environmental interventions to promote healthy eating: a review of models, programs, and evidence. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):395–415. Winter.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Higgins JAD, Sterne. JAC. Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies. In: Higgins JGS, ed2011: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed October 2013. The handbook describes extensively the methodology of the Cochrane reviews. In particular, it provides a procedure to assess the potential risk of bias that my hinder the causal inferences in clinical trials and was adapted for this review.

  52. Arao T, Oida Y, Maruyama C, et al. Impact of lifestyle intervention on physical activity and diet of Japanese workers. Prev Med. 2007;45(2–3):146–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Goetzel RZ, Roemer EC, Pei X, et al. Second-year results of an obesity prevention program at the Dow Chemical Company. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(3):291–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Brehm BJ, Gates DM, Singler M, Succop PA, D'Alessio DA. Environmental changes to control obesity: a randomized controlled trial in manufacturing companies. Am J Health Promot. 2011;25(5):334–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. French SA, Harnack LJ, Hannan PJ, Mitchell NR, Gerlach AF, Toomey TL. Worksite environment intervention to prevent obesity among metropolitan transit workers. Prev Med. 2010;50(4):180–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lemon SC, Zapka J, Li W, et al. Step ahead a worksite obesity prevention trial among hospital employees. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(1):27–38.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Linde JA, Nygaard KE, MacLehose RF, et al. HealthWorks: results of a multi-component group-randomized worksite environmental intervention trial for weight gain prevention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:14.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Racette SB, Deusinger SS, Inman CL, et al. Worksite Opportunities for Wellness (WOW): effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors after 1 year. Prev Med. 2009;49(2–3):108–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Siegel JM, Prelip ML, Erausquin JT, Kim SA. A worksite obesity intervention: results from a group-randomized trial. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(2):327–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Soler RE, Leeks KD, Razi S, et al. A systematic review of selected interventions for worksite health promotion. The assessment of health risks with feedback. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(2 Suppl):S237–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Grembroski D. The Practice of Health Program Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  62. Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(2):134–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Midgley G. Systems Thinking for the 21st Century. Int J Knowl Syst Sci. 2004;1(1):63–9.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Devine CM, Nelson JA, Chin N, Dozier A, Fernandez ID. "Pizza is cheaper than salad": assessing workers' views for an environmental food intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15 Suppl 1:57S–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Isabel Diana Fernandez, Adan Becerra, and Nancy P. Chin declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Diana Fernandez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernandez, I.D., Becerra, A. & Chin, N.P. Worksite Environmental Interventions for Obesity Prevention and Control: Evidence from Group Randomized Trials. Curr Obes Rep 3, 223–234 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-014-0100-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-014-0100-4

Keywords

Navigation