Abstract
Agroecology is a recent scientific field that has become increasingly active since 1990. It has moved away from conventional emphasis on crops and productivity and has embraced a systemic, multidisciplinary approach that focuses on agroecosystems or food systems and their sustainability. Here, we analyze original articles in agroecology that have been published in eight major global databases in order to establish where agroecology is taking place and what topics focus on agroecology. For this, a systematic review was conducted with original articles with the word “agroecological” in the title and published in English, Spanish, and/or Portuguese as inclusion criteria. One hundred thirty-one articles were found but we were able to access 116. Area of study, country of affiliation of the researchers, publication countries, and topic of the paper were analyzed. It was found that Brazil (18 articles out of 131), Cuba (8), and Nigeria (8) are the most studied countries; Brazil (19 in 116 articles), the USA (12), and Cuba (9) are the countries with more affiliated researchers; and the Netherlands (26 out of 131), Brazil (19), and Germany (12) are the countries that publish articles the most. Additionally, it was found that the most popular topics of research are behavior of crops and species in function of environmental conditions (15 out of 116), soils (12), and production in agroecological systems (13), while sustainability (3), agroecological transition (1), and biodiversity (1) are rare. Our findings show that research follows a colonial pattern where industrialized countries lead publishing, conduct research studies both in industrialized and non-industrialized countries, and do not publish in non-industrialized countries, while non-industrialized countries publish in industrialized and non-industrialized countries and do not conduct research studies in foreign regions. In addition, they show that food systems and sustainability are still not common subjects of study although they are main concerns in agroecology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altieri MA (2010) El estado del arte de la agroecología: revisando avances y desafíos. In: León T, Altieri MA (eds) Vertientes del pensamiento agroecológico: fundamentos y aplicaciones. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, pp 77–104
Altieri MA, Yurjevic A (1991) La agroecología y el desarrollo rural sostenible en América Latina. Agroecol Desarro 1:25–36
Brandenburg A (2002) Movimento agroecológico: trajetória, contradições e perspectivas. Desenvolv Meio Ambiente 6:11–28
Caporal FR (2006) Documenting agroecology: a competition in Brazil. LEISA 22:20–21
Dalgaard T, Hutchings NJ, Porter JR (2003) Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 100:39–51. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00152-X
Francis C, Lieblein G, Gliessman S, Breland TA, Creamer N, Harwood R, Salomonsson L, Helenius J, Rickerl D, Salvador R, Wiedenhoeft M, Simmons S, Allen P, Altieri M, Flora C, Poincelot R (2003) Agroecology: the ecology of food systems. J Sustain Agric 22:99–118. doi:10.1300/J064v22n03_10
Funes-Monzote F (2001) La agricultura cubana en camino a la sostenibilidad. LEISA 7:21–23
García H (2010) Una historia de nuestros otros. Indígenas, letrados y antropólogos en el estudio de la diferencia cultural en Colombia (1880–1960). Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá
González M (1992) Agroecología: bases teóricas para una historia agraria alternativa. Agroecol Desarro 4:22–33
Haraway DJ (1989) Primate visions: gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. Routledge, New York
Hecht SB (1995) The evolution of agroecological thought. In: Altieri MA (ed) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. Westview, Boulder, pp 1–19
Maldonado-Torres N (2007) Sobre la colonialidad del ser: contribnuciones al desarrollo de un concepto. In: Castro-Gómez S, Grosofoguel R (eds) El giro decolonial. Siglo del Hombre, Bogotá, pp 127-167
Meis L, Velloso A, Lannes D, Carmo MS, Cd M (2003) The growing competition in Brazilian science: rites of passage, stress and burnout. Braz J Med Biol Res 36:1135–1141
Mendiola I (2009) La bio(tanato)política moderna y la producción de disponibilidad. In: Mendiola I (ed) Rastros y rostros de la biopolítica. Anthropos, Barcelona, pp 33–69
Midgley G (1993) Systems thinking and ecology. Syst Pract Action Res 6:565–566. doi:10.1007/BF01059513
Ortiz R (2009) La supremacía del inglés en las ciencias sociales. Siglo Veintiuno, Buenos Aires
Pai M, McCulloch M, Gorman JD, Pai N, Enanoria W, Kennedy G, Tharyan P, Colford JM Jr (2004) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide. Natl Med J India 17:86–95
Pereira RI (2008) Agroecología. Una necesidad urgente para la sostenibilidad de la vida humana en la tierra. Nuevos Tiempos 13:77–86
Regalado A (2010) Brazilian science: riding a gusher. Science 330:1306–1312. doi:10.1126/science.330.6009.1306
Sevilla E (2006) De la sociología rural a la agroecología. Icaria, Barcelona
Simeón RE (1997) La ciencia y la tecnología en Cuba. Rev Cubana Med Trop 4:153–160
Tomich TP, Brodt S, Ferris H, Galt R, Horwath WR, Kebreab E, Leveau JHJ, Liptzin D, Lubell M, Merel P, Michelmore R, Rosenstock T, Scow K, Six J, Williams N, Yang L (2011) Agroecology: a review from a global-change perspective. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:193–222. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012110-121302
UNESCO (2005) UNESCO scientific report 2005. UNESCO, Paris
Wezel A, Soldat V (2009) A quantitative and qualitative historical analysis of the scientific discipline of agroecology. Int J Agric Sustain 7:3–18. doi:10.3763/ijas.2009.0400
Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C (2009) Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:503–515. doi:10.1051/agro/2009004
Acknowledgments
We thank all authors and journals who replied and sent us their articles.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Gómez, L.F., Ríos-Osorio, L. & Eschenhagen, M.L. Agroecology publications and coloniality of knowledge. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33, 355–362 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0109-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0109-6