Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimizing lentil-based mixed cropping with different companion crops and plant densities in terms of crop yield and weed control

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mixed cropping of lentil (Lens culinaris) with five spring-sown companion crops: naked barley (Hordeum vulgare), wheat (Triticum aestivum), oats (Avena sativa), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) was compared with monocropping at the organic research station Kleinhohenheim, University of Hohenheim, Germany, in 2009 and 2010. Besides sole lentil and sole companion crops, three mixing ratios (3:1, 1:1 and 1:3) were used. The aim of the study was to identify the most suitable companion crop and mixing ratio for lentils in terms of yield, weed infestation and lodging under temperate climatic conditions. Lentils yielded 1.47 t ha−1 in monocropping and 0.58–1.07 t ha−1 in mixed cropping, depending on the mixing ratio and companion crop. The land equivalent ratio (LER) was higher in mixed cropping than monocropping generally. Lentil–wheat and lentil–barley mixed cropping with a ratio of 3:1 resulted in the highest LER (ca. 1.50); lentil–linseed had the lowest LER for all ratios. Least lodging was observed in lentil–wheat and lentil–oat mixed cropping. Compared with lentil monocropping, mixed cropping with ratios of 3:1, 1:1 and 1:3 (lentil/companion/crop) reduced weed biomass by 29, 41 and 24 %, respectively. Mixed cropping with wheat and barley for lentil in central Europe gives marked benefits in terms of grain yield, weed control and crop lodging resistance. Lentil production in organic farming systems is well suited to mixed cropping approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B:

Barley

Bw:

Buckwheat

CC:

Companion crop

L:

Lentil

LAI:

Leaf area index

Ls:

Linseed

Mono:

Monocropping

O:

Oat

W:

Wheat

References

  • Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W (2006) Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Eur J Agron 25:202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlawat IPS, Singh A, Sharma RP (1985) Water and nitrogen management in wheat lentil intercropping system under late-sown conditions. J Agric Sci (Camb) 105:697–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akter N, Alim MA, Mahbubul Islam M, Naher Z, Rahman M, Iqbal Hossain ASM (2004) Evaluation of mixed and intercropping of lentil and wheat. J Agron 3:48–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK, Ghose SS (2006) Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. Eur J Agron 24:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMELV (Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection) (2011) Organic farming in Germany. http://www.bmelv.de/SharedDocs/Standardartikel/EN/Agriculture/OrganicFarming/OrganicFarmingInGermany.html#doc381512bodyText4. Accessed 13 Feb 2012

  • Brouwer JB, Sharma B, Malik BA, Hill GD (2000) Asia-Pacific: meeting the challenge. In: Knight R (ed) Linking research and marketing opportunities for pulses in the 21st century. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 115–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carr MP, Gardner CJ, Schatz GB, Zwinger WS, Guldan JS (1995) Grain yield and weed biomass of a wheat–lentil intercrop. Agron J 87:574–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciftci V, Ulker M (2005) Effect of mixed cropping lentil with wheat and barley at different seeding ratios. J Agron 4:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission) (2010) An analysis of the EU organic sector. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/markets/organic_2010_en.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2012

  • FAO (2010) FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor. Accessed 13 Oct 2010

  • Gangasaran G, Giri G (1985) Intercropping of mustard with chickpea, lentil and barley in drylands. Indian J Agron 30:244–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2001) Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea–barley intercropping. Field Crops Res 70:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks CRR, Valenzuela HR, Defrank J (1998) Incidence of pests and arthropod natural enemies in zucchini grown with living mulches. Agric Ecosyst Environ 69:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horneburg B (2006) Short communication: outcrossing in lentil (Lens culinaris) depends on cultivar, location and year, and varies within cultivars. Plant Breed 125:638–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2009) The SAS system for Windows Release 9.2. SAS Institute, Cary

  • Liebman M, Dyck E (1993) Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol Appl 3:92–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal BK, Dhara MC, Mandal BB, Das SK, Nandy R (1990) Rice, mungbean, soybean, peanut, ricebean and blackgram yields under different intercropping systems. Agron J 82:1063–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVicar R, McCall P, Brenzil C, Hartley S, Panchuk K, Mooleki P, Vandenberg A, Banniza S. Revised by Risula R (2010) Lentil in Saskatchewan. http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=c5993bcc-009f-4031-b936-c52c992b9e7d. Accessed 22 Dec. 2010

  • Muehlbauer FJ, Short RW, Summerfield RJ, Morrison KJ, Swan DG (1981) Description and culture of lentils. Coop Ext Serv Circ EB-0957. Washington State University, Pullman

  • Muehlbauer FJ, Kaiser WJ, Clement SL, Summerfield RJ (1995) Production and breeding of lentil. Adv Agron 54:283–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofori F, Stern WR (1987) Cereal–legume intercropping systems. Adv Agron 41:41–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olasantan FO, Lucas EO, Ezumah HC (1994) Effects of intercropping and fertilizer application on weed control and performance of cassava and maize. Field Crops Res 39:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick MC, Gardner JC, Schatz BG, Zwinger SW, Guldan SJ (1995) Grain yield and weed biomass of a wheat–lentil intercrop. Agron J 87:574–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson HD (1997) Analysis of series of variety trials. In: Kempton RA, Fox PN (eds) Statistical methods for plant variety evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 139–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhon HS, Singh G, Ram H (2007) Lentil-based cropping systems. In: Yadav SS et al (eds) Lentil: an ancient crop for modern times. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique KHM, Loss SP, Pritchard DL, Regan KL, Tennant D, Jettner RL, Wilkinson D (1998) Adaptation of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) to Mediterranean-type environments: effect of time of sowing on growth, yield, and water use. Aust J Agric Res 49:613–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szumigalski A, Rene V (2005) Weed suppression and crop production in annual intercrops. Weed Sci 53:813–825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachostergios DN, Lithourgidis AS, Roupakias DG (2011) Adaptability to organic farming of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) varieties developed from conventional breeding programmes. J Agric Sci 149:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willey RW (1979) Intercropping—its importance and research needs. Part Ι. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstr 32:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagmur M, Kaydan D (2006) Different intercrop arrangements with lentil and barley under dryland condition. Pak J Biol Sci 9(10):1917–1922

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Ilona Weikert, Oliver Hübner and Rainer Funk who supported the field work from sowing to harvesting, and also Andrea Rückle for giving help in the laboratory work. We thank Woldemar Mammel and the Öko-EZG “Albleisa” for providing the seeds and for other advice and assistance. The authors also thank Jens Möhring for supporting the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Crop Science (340a), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 23, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany

    Lina Wang, Sabine Gruber & Wilhelm Claupein

Authors
  1. Lina Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sabine Gruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wilhelm Claupein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lina Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, L., Gruber, S. & Claupein, W. Optimizing lentil-based mixed cropping with different companion crops and plant densities in terms of crop yield and weed control. Org. Agr. 2, 79–87 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-012-0028-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-012-0028-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation