Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of principal component analysis models for sensor fault detection and isolation

  • Regular Papers
  • Control Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new method for determining the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) model structure for system diagnosis is proposed. This method, based on the variables reconstruction principle, determines the PCA model optimizing detection and isolation of single or multiple faults affecting redundant or non redundant variables of a system. This new method has been validated by a simulation example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. X. Ding, P. Zhang, A. Naik, E. L. Ding, and B. Huang, “Subspace method aided data-driven design of fault detection and isolation systems,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1496–1510, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. F. Harkat, G. Mourot, and J. Ragot, “An improved PCA scheme for sensor FDI: application to an air quality monitoring network,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 625–634, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. J. Qin, “Statistical process monitoring: basis and beyond,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 480–502, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Tharrault, G. Mourot, J. Ragot, and D. Maquin, “Sensor fault detection and isolation by robust principal component analysis,” Fault Detection, Wei Zhang Ed., In-Tech, Chap. 16, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Kourti and J. F. MacGregor, “Multivariate SPC methods for process and product monitoring,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 409–428, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Dunia and S. J. Qin, “A subspace approach to multidimensional fault identification and reconstruction,” American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1813–1831, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Huang, J. Gertler, and T. McAvoy, “Sensor and Actuator Fault Isolation by Structured Partial PCA with Nonlinear Extensions,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 459–469, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. F. Harkat, G. Mourot, and J. Ragot, “Differentes methodes de localisation de deauts basees sur les dernieres composantes principales,” Proc. of Conference Internationale Francophone d’Automatique CIFA, Nantes-France, 6–8 July 2002.

  9. M. Kano, K. Nagao, S. Hasebe, I. Hashimoto, H. Ohno, and R. Strauss, “Comparison of multivariate statistical process control monitoring methods with applications to the Eastman challenge problem,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 161–174, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Valle, L. Weihua, and S. J. Qin, “Selection of the number of principal components: The variance of the reconstruction error criterion with a comparison to other methods,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 4389–4401, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Tamura and S. Tsujita, “A study on the number of principal components and sensitivity of fault detection using PCA,” Journal of Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1035–1046, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Westerhuis, S. Gurden, and A. Smilde, “Standardized q-statistic for improved sensitivity in the monitoring of residuals in MSPC,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 335–349, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. H. Yue and S. J. Qin, “Reconstruction-based fault identification using a combined index,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 40, no. 20, pp. 4403–4414, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Jiang, H. Wang, and D. Yang, “Process monitoring in principal component analysis. Part 1. fault reconstruction study,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, The Hague, The Netherlands, 10–13 October 2004.

  15. A. Benaicha, G. Mourot, M. Guerfel, K. Benothman, and J. Ragot, “A new method for determining PCA models for system diagnosis,” Proc. of the 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Congress Palace Hotel, Marrakech, Morocco, 23–25 June 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anissa Benaicha.

Additional information

Recommended by Editorial Board member Bin Jiang under the direction of Editor Myotaeg Lim.

Anissa Benaicha received her engineering degree in Electric in 2007 and her MSc degree in Automatics and Industrial Maintenance in 2008 from the National Engineering School of Monastir, Tunisia. She is currently a Ph.D. student in the same university. Her interests include fault diagnosis, multi statistical process control, and interval arithmetic.

Gilles Mourot received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 1993 from the “Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine (INPL)”, Nancy, France. His research activities, within Automatic Control Research Center of Nancy (CRAN), include data-driven fault detection and isolation and multiple model identification of nonlinear system.

Kamel Benothman received the license in Mechanical and Energetic Engineering in 1980 from the University of Valencienne, France. He obtained his engineering diploma in Mechanics and Energetic, an MSc degree in Automatics and Signal Processing in 1981 and a Ph.D. in Automatics and Signal Processing in 1984 from the same University. He received his DSc degree from the National Engineering School of Tunis, Tunisia in 2008. He is currently a professor at the High Institute of Sciences and Energy Technologies of Gafsa, Tunisia. His interests include reliability, fault diagnosis, multi statistical process control, and fuzzy systems. He is a member of the Association of Electrician Specialists in Tunisia ASET.

José Ragot received the Engineer’s degree with specialization in Control from the Ecole Centrale de Nantes (France) in 1969. Then, he joined the University of Nancy (France) where in 1973 he obtained his Ph.D. degree, a position as assistant professor at University Henri Poincaré in Nancy, and in 1980 the “Diplôme de Doctorat-es-Sciences”. José Ragot moved up to professor in 1985 at the Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine. Presently he is an Emeritus Professor at the “Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Géologie”. Jose Ragot is researcher in the “Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy” (CRAN, CNRS UMR 7039) where he was the head of the group “process diagnosis” during 12 years. His major research fields include data validation and reconciliation, process diagnosis, fault detection and isolation. A part of his activities is devoted to identification and state estimation, adapted to process diagnosis and mainly in the field of multimodels. A list of these publications can be founded at http://perso.ensem.inpl-nancy.fr/Jose.Ragot/.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benaicha, A., Mourot, G., Benothman, K. et al. Determination of principal component analysis models for sensor fault detection and isolation. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 11, 296–305 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-012-0142-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-012-0142-x

Keywords

Navigation