Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adaptive feedback system for optimal pacing strategies in road cycling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In road cycling, the pacing strategy plays an important role, especially in solo events like individual time trials. Nevertheless, not much is known about pacing under varying conditions. Based on mathematical models, optimal pacing strategies were derived for courses with varying slope or wind, but rarely tested for their practical validity. In this paper, we present a framework for feedback during rides in the field based on optimal pacing strategies and methods to update the strategy if conditions are different than expected in the optimal pacing strategy. To update the strategy, two solutions based on model predictive control and proportional–integral–derivative control, respectively, are presented. Real rides are simulated inducing perturbations like unexpected wind or errors in the model parameter estimates, e.g., rolling resistance. It is shown that the performance drops below the best achievable one taking into account the perturbations when the strategy is not updated. This is mainly due to premature exhaustion or unused energy resources at the end of the ride. Both the proposed strategy updates handle those problems and ensure that a performance close to the best under the given conditions is delivered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clear J (2014) This coach improved every tiny thing by 1 percent and here’s what happened. https://jamesclear.com/marginal-gains. Accessed 09 Apr 2018

  2. Abbiss CR, Laursen PB (2008) Describing and understanding pacing strategies during athletic competition. Sports Med 38(3):239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Swain DP (1997) A model for optimizing cycling performance by varying power on hills and in wind. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29(8):1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson G, Peacock O, Passfield L (2007) Variable versus constant power strategies during cycling time-trials: prediction of time savings using an up-to-date mathematical model. J Sports Sci 25(9):1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cangley P, Passfield L, Carter H, Bailey M (2011) The effect of variable gradients on pacing in cycling time-trials. Int J Sports Med 32(02):132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon S (2005) Optimising distribution of power during a cycling time trial. Sports Eng 8(2):81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahmen T, Wolf S, Saupe D (2012) Applications of mathematical models of road cycling. IFAC Proc Vol 45(2):804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fayazi SA, Wan N, Lucich S, Vahidi A, Mocko G (2013) Optimal pacing in a cycling time-trial considering cyclist’s fatigue dynamics. In: American control conference (ACC), pp 6442–6447. IEEE, New York

  9. Sundström D, Carlsson P, Tinnsten M (2014) Comparing bioenergetic models for the optimisation of pacing strategy in road cycling. Sports Eng 17(4):207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dahmen T (2016) A 4-parameter critical power model for optimal pacing strategies in road cycling. In: Workshop modelling in endurance sports, pp 07–10

  11. Sundström D, Bäckström M (2017) Optimization of pacing strategies for variable wind conditions in road cycling (Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers). J Sports Eng Technol Part P 231(3):184

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto S (2018) Optimal pacing in road cycling using a nonlinear power constraint. Sports Eng

  13. Wolf S, Bertschinger R, Saupe D (2016) Road cycling climbs made speedier by personalized pacing strategies. In: 4th international congress on sport sciences research and technology support, pp 109–114

  14. Wan N, Fayazi SA, Saeidi H, Vahidi A (2014) Optimal power management of an electric bicycle based on terrain preview and considering human fatigue dynamics. In: American control conference (ACC), pp 3462–3467. IEEE, New York

  15. Guanetti J, Formentin S, Corno M, Savaresi SM (2017) Optimal energy management in series hybrid electric bicycles. Automatica 81:96

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin JC, Milliken DL, Cobb JE, McFadden KL, Coggan AR (1998) Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power. J Appl Biomech 14(3):276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dahmen T, Byshko R, Saupe D, Röder M, Mantler S (2011) Validation of a model and a simulator for road cycling on real tracks. Sports Eng 14(2–4):95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Monod H, Scherrer J (1965) The work capacity of a synergic muscular group. Ergonomics 8(3):329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rieck M, Bittner M, Grüter B, Diepolder J (2017) Falcon.m user guide. http://www.falcon-m.com. Accessed 24 Oct 2017

  20. Patterson MA, Rao AV (2014) GPOPS-II: a matlab software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive Gaussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming. ACM Trans Math Softw (TOMS) 41(1):1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Acado toolkit user’s manual v1.2.1beta (2017). http://acado.sourceforge.net/doc/pdf/acado_manual.pdf. Accessed 02 Nov 2017

  22. Wolf S, Dobiasch M, Artiga Gonzalez A, Saupe D (2017) How to accurately determine the position on a known course in road cycling. In: International symposium on computer science in sport. Springer, New York, pp 103–109

  23. Wolf S, Saupe D (2018) Knowing your slope on the track: getting the most out of GPS and power data. J Sci Cycl 6(3):14

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sundström D (2016) On a bioenergetic four-compartment model for human exercise. Sports Eng 19(4):251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Artiga Gonzalez A, Wolf S, Saupe D, Bertschinger R (2018) Visual feedback for pacing strategies in road cycling. In: Schriften der Deutschen Vereinigung für Sportwissenschaft, pp 76–77

  26. Wolf S, Artiga Gonzalez A, Saupe D (2018) Modeling in road cycling for optimal pacing strategies: theory vs. practice. J Sci Cycl 7(2):18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dietmar Saupe.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is a part of Topical Collection in Sports Engineering on Measuring Behavior in Sport and Exercise, edited by Dr. Tom Allen, Dr. Robyn Grant, Dr. Stefan Mohr and Dr. Jonathan Shepherd.

This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—247721022.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolf, S., Biral, F. & Saupe, D. Adaptive feedback system for optimal pacing strategies in road cycling. Sports Eng 22, 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-019-0294-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-019-0294-5

Keywords

Navigation