Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Fossil Record of the Solanaceae Revisited and Revised—The Fossil Record of Rhamnaceae Enhanced

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solanaceae is a large cosmopolitan family of angiosperms that includes some 92–100 genera and 2300–2500 species. It has been the object of a great deal of attention because of its economic importance as a food source (tomatoes, potatoes, peppers), because it includes tobacco, and is source of drugs (alkaloids). However its fossil history has been elusive with relatively few seemingly reliable reports throughout Tertiary times and no solid bases for molecular dating models to pinpoint important events in its diversification and evolution. While the great diversity found within the family makes it difficult to find morphological characters that define it, in general, the flowers have an overall distinctive morphology with some diagnostic morphological characters. Thus, as is often the case, flowers are potentially the most reliable indicators of the family in the fossil record. There have been a number of reports of flowers representing Solanaceae in the Tertiary. Yet, we report here that upon reinvestigation only one taxon remains as a plausible representative of the family while one of the most notable and frequently cited fossil Solanaceae from the Tertiary of North America is clearly a member of the family Rhamnaceae consistent with the fossil leaf record.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Aagesen, L., D. Medan, J. Kellermann & H. H. Hilger. 2005. Phylogeny of the tribe Colletieae (Rhamnaceae)—a sensitivity analysis of the plastid region trnL-trnF combined with morphology. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 250(3–4): 197–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, V. A., S. E. Williams & M. W. Chase. 1992. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science, New Series. 257(5076): 1491–1495.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 1998. An ordinal classification of the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 85(4): 531–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APGII. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 141(4): 399–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, E. W. 1916. The Lower Eocene Floras of Southeastern North America. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. 91: 1–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1930. Revision of the lower Eocene Wilcox flora of the southeastern States, with descriptions of new species, chiefly from Tennessee and Kentucky. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. 156: 1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, B., K. Bremer, N. Heidari, P. Erixon, R. G. Olmstead, A. A. Anderberg, M. Källersjö & E. Barkhordarian. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 24(2): 274–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvillo-Canadell, L. 2000. Determinación taxonómica de estructuras reproductivas y vegetativas de plantas fósiles de Tepexi de Rodríguez, Puebla. M.S. thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.

  • ——— & S. R. S. Cevallos-Ferriz. 2007. Reproductive structures of Rhamnaceae from the Cerro del Pueblo (Late Cretaceous, Coahuila) and Coatzingo (Oligocene, Puebla) Formations, Mexico. American Journal of Botany. 94(10): 1658–1669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carrizo Garcia, C., M. Matesevach & G. Barboza. 2008. Features related to anther opening in Solanum species (Solanaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 158(2): 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, M. E. J. 1957. The Oligocene flora of the Bovey Tracey Lake Basin, Devonshire. British Museum (Natural History), Geology. 3: 118.

  • Chandler, M. E. J. 1962. The Lower Tertiary floras of Southern England. II. Flora of the Pipe-Clay Series of Dorset (Lower Bagshot). British Museum (Natural History), London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Châteauneuf, J. J. & D. Nury. 1995. La flore de l’Oligocène de Provence méridionale: implications stratigraphiques, environnementales et climatiques. Geologie de la France. 2: 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, M. E. 1983. Fossil Plants of the London Clay. Palaeontological Association Field Guides to Fossils No. 1. The Palaeontological Association. London.

  • Crepet, W. L. 1974. Eocene angiosperm flowers. Science, New Series. 185(4153): 781–782.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1979. Some aspects of the pollination biology of Middle Eocene angiosperms. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 27(3–4): 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1984. Advanced (constant) insect pollination mechanisms: Pattern of evolution and implications vis-a-vis angiosperm diversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 71(2): 607–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Saporta, G. 1861. Examen analytique des flores tertiaries de Provence, précédé d’une notice géologique et paléontologique sur les terrains tertiaires lacustres de cette région par M. Phil. Matheron. Pp 117–170. In: O. Heer (ed). Recherches sur le climat et la Végétation du Pays Tertiaire, traduction par Charles Th. Gaudin. J. Rothschild, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1862. Études sur la végétation du sud-est de la France à l’époque Tertiaire. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 4e Série Botanique 17: 191–311. + 14 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1863. Études sur la végétation du sud-est de la France à l’époque Tertiaire. Masson et Fils, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1873. Études sur la végétation du sud-est de la France à l’époque Tertiaire. Supplément 1, Révision de la flore des Gypses d’Aix. Troisième fascicule. Description des espéces Dicotylédones. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 5e Série Botanique 18: 23–146. + 12 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1886. Sur l’horizon réel qui doit être assigné à la flore fossile d’Aix en Provence. Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Academie de Sciences. 103: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilcher, D. L. 1971. A revision of the Eocene flora of southeastern North America. The Palaeobotanist. 20: 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff, P. A., J. Farris & K. Nixon. 2003. T.N.T.: Tree analysis using new technology version 1.1 (December 2007, Willi Hennig Society Edition). Program and documentation. <www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/TNT/>.

  • ———, ——— & ———. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 24(5): 774–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, F. M., J. G. Ogg, A. G. Smith, W. Bleeker & L. J. Lourens. 2004. A New Geologic Time Scale, with special reference to Precambrian and Neogene from the Dabie Mountains, central China. Episodes. 27(2): 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, O. 1855. Flora Tertiaria Helvetiae. Die tertiäre Flora der Schweiz. Erster Band. Cryptogamen, Gymnospermen und Monocotyledonen. J. Wurster & Compagnie, Winterthur.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1859a. Flora Tertiaria Helvetiae. Die tertiäre Flora der Schweiz. Dritter Band. Die gamopetalen und polypetalen Dicotyledonen. Anhang. Allgemeiner Theil. J. Wurster & Compagnie, Winterthur.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1859b. Allgemeiner Theil. Ueber das Klima und die Vegetationsverhaltnisse des Tertiärlandes. Pp 201–369. In: O. Heer (ed). Flora Tertiaria Helvetiae. Die tertiäre Flora der Schweiz. Dritter Band. Die gamopetalen und polypetalen Dicotyledonen. Anhang. Allgemeiner Theil. Wurster & Comp, Winterthur.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1861. Recherches sur le climat et la Végétation du Pays Tertiaire, traduction par Charles Th. Gaudin. J. Rothschild, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunziker, L. 2001. Genera Solanacearum: the genera of Solanaceae illustrated, arranged according to a new system. Ruggell, Liechtenstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. B., M. P. Simmons & R. H. Archer. 2006. Phylogeny of the Elaeodendron group (Celastraceae) inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid genes. Systematic Botany. 31(3): 512–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. H. & D. L. Dilcher. 1980. Investigations of angiosperms from the Eocene of North America: Rhamnus marginatus (Rhamnaceae) reexamined. American Journal of Botany 67: 959–967.

  • J. McNeill, F. R. Barrie, H. M. Burdet, V. Demoulin, D. L. Hawksworth, K. Marhold, D. H. Nicolson, J. Prado, P. C. Silva, J. E. Skog, J. H. Wiersema & N. J. Turland (eds). 2006. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code), adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Regnum Vegetabile 146. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG.

  • Kvacek, Z. & B. Erdei. 2001. Putative proteaceous elements of the Lomatites-type reinterpreted as new Berberis of the European Tertiary. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 226(1–2): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, E. B. & S. T. Clay-Poole. 2001. Florissant leaf and pollen floras of Colorado compared; climatic implications. In: E. Evanoff, G. Wodzicki, M. Kathryn & K. R. Johnson (eds). Fossil flora and stratigraphy of the Florissant Formation, Colorado. Proceedings of the Denver Museum of Natural History 4, no. 1. Pp. 17–69.

  • Martinez-Millan, M. 2010. Fossil record and age of the Asteridae. Botanical Review 76: 83–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, T. R. & T. J. Barkman. 2005. Reconstruction of Solanaceae Phylogeny Using the Nuclear Gene SAMT. Systematic Botany. 30(2): 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massalongo, A. 1851. Sopra le piante fossili dei terreni terziarj del Vicentino. A. Bianchi Padova.

  • Medan, D. & L. Aagesen. 1995. Comparative flower and fruit structure in the Colletieae (Rhamnaceae). Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie. 117(4): 531–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ——— & C. Schirarend. 2004. Rhamnaceae. Pp 320–338. In: K. Kubitzki (ed). The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol VI. Flowering plants. Dicotyledons. Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasri-Ayachi, M. B. & M. A. Nabli. 1995. Pollen wall structure and ontogeny in Ziziphus lotus L. (Rhamnaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 85(1–2): 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, K. C. 2002. Winclada ver. 1.00.08. Published by the author, Ithaca, NY, USA. <www.cladistics.com/>.

  • Olmstead, R. G., L. Bohs, H. A. Migid, E. Santiago-Valentin, F. F. García, S. M. Collier, J. A. Sweere, R. E. Spangler, L. Bohs & J. D. Palmer. 1999. Phylogeny and provisional classification of the Solanaceae based on chloroplast DNA. Pp 111–137. In: M. Nee, D. Symon, R. N. Lester, & J. Jessop (eds). Solanaceae IV: Advances in Biology and Utilization. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ———, ———, ———, ——— & ———. 2008. A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae. Taxon. 57(4): 1159–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, H. F. 1907. Tertiary Mammal Horizons of North America, abstract of a preliminary study. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 23(11): 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perveen, A. & M. Qaiser. 2005. Pollen flora of Pakistan – XLIV. Rhamnaceae. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 37(2): 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, F. W., Jr. 1976. Investigations of angiosperms from the Eocene of southeastern North America: pollen assemblages from Miller Pit, Henry County, Tennessee. Palaeontographica. Abteilung B: Palaeophytologie. 157: 44–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punt, W., A. Marks & P. P. Hoen. 2003. The Northwest European Pollen Flora. VIII. Rhamnaceae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 123(1–2): 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, E. M. & M. E. J. Chandler. 1933. The London Clay Flora. British Museum (Natural History), London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. E., M. F. Fay, Q. C. B. Cronk, D. Bowman & M. W. Chase. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany. 87(9): 1309–1324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto, M., D. M. Crayn, B. R. Jackes & C. Porter. 2007. An updated estimate of inter-generic phylogenetic relationships in the Australian Vitaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany. 85(8): 722–730.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schirarend, C. 1996. Pollen morphology of the genus Paliurus (Rhamnaceae). Grana. 35(6): 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, M. P. & H. Ochoterena. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology. 49(2): 369–381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szafer, W. 1946–1947. Flora pliocen´ ska z Krościenkan. Dunajcem (The Pliocene flora of Krościenko in Poland). Rozp. Polsk. Akad. Umiej. Wydz. Mat.-Przyr. PAU, B, 72(1–2): 1–375.

  • Szafer, W. 1961. Miocene flora from Stare Gliwice in Upper Silesia. Instytut Geologiczny Prace, XXXIII, Wydawnictwa Geologiczne, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tétény, P. 1987. A chemotaxonomic classification of the Solanaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 74(3): 600–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin & D. G. Higgins. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 25(24): 4876–4882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, N. D. & J. Healy. 2003. GapCoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 4: 6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y.-L. & Y.-L. Chen. 1992. A study on pollen morphology of tribe Rhamneae (Rhamnaceae) in China. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 30(1): 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L.-B. & M. P. Simmons. 2006. Phylogeny and delimitation of the Celastrales inferred from nuclear and plastid genes. Systematic Botany. 31(1): 122–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. L. H. Bailey Hortorium, Department of Plant Biology, 412 Mann Library Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

    Marcela Millan & William Crepet

Authors
  1. Marcela Millan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Crepet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Crepet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Millan, M., Crepet, W. The Fossil Record of the Solanaceae Revisited and Revised—The Fossil Record of Rhamnaceae Enhanced. Bot. Rev. 80, 73–106 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-014-9134-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-014-9134-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation