Abstract
The increasing use of bi-directional (Osterberg cell) load tests in piles necessitates a reliable evaluation of the load-movement relationship equivalent to the head-down load test. In this study, the existing evaluation methods were reviewed, and a new method for evaluating the equivalent head-down curve was proposed. This method considers possible situations, such as non-measured axial load distribution along the pile and the existence of residual load distribution. Three cases, in which bi-directional and head-down load tests were performed at the same site, were analyzed in order to validate the proposed method. The results of the case studies showed that the equivalent load-movement curves obtained either without assuming unit shaft resistance distribution or by considering the effect of residual load agreed well with the measured curves obtained from the head-down test. Therefore, the proposed method is recommended for practical use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altaee, A., Evgin, E., and Fellenius, B. H. (1993). “Load transfer for piles in sand and the critical depth.” Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 455–463.
Baker, C. N., Park, G., Braid, J. L., Drumright, E. E., and Mensah, F. (1993). Drilled shafts for bridge foundations, Rep. No. FHWA RD 92 004, FHWA, Wa.
Fellenius, B. H. (2004). “Unified design of piled foundations with emphasis on settlement analysis.” Proc., ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 125, Current Practices and Future Trends in Deep Foundations, ASCE, Va., pp. 253–275.
Fellenius, B. H., Kim, S. R., and Chung, S. G. (2009). “Long-term monitoring of strain in instrumented piles.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, Vol. 135, No. 11, pp. 1583–1595.
Gregersen, O. S., Aas, G., and DiBiagio, E. (1973). “Load tests on friction piles in loose sand.” Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg, ICSMFE, pp. 109–117.
Kim, S. R., Chung, S. G., and Fellenius, B. H. (2011). “Distribution of residual load and true shaft resistance for a driven instrumented test pile.” Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 583–598.
Kim, H. J. and Mission, J. L. (2011). “Improved evaluation of equivalent top-down load-displacement curve from a bottom-up pile load test.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 6, pp. 568–578.
Kwon, O. S., Choi, Y. K., Kwon, O. K., and Kim, M. M. (2005). “Comparison of the bidirectional load test with the top-down load test.” Transportation Research Record. 1936, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 108–116.
Lee, J. S. and Park, Y. H. (2008). “Equivalent pile load-head settlement curve using a bi-directional pile load test.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 124–133.
Loadtest (2001). Construction of the equivalent top-loaded loadsettlement curve from the results of an O-cell test, Loadtest Appendix to Reports.
Osterberg, J. O. (1998). “The Osterberg load test method for drilled shafts and driven piles-The First ten years.” Proceedings 7th International Conference on Deep Foundations, Vienna, Austria, June 15–17, Deep Foundation Institute, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Xi, X., Chen, L., and Liu, W. (2010). “An analytical solution to transform O-cell pile test data into conventional load-settlement curve.” GeoShanghai 2010 International Conference, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 205, pp. 192–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, SR., Chung, SG. Equivalent head-down load vs. Movement relationships evaluated from bi-directional pile load tests. KSCE J Civ Eng 16, 1170–1177 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1700-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1700-8