Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conceptualizing a Monitoring System for Indicators in Middle Childhood

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Middle childhood is often overlooked by researchers and policy makers. However, it is a unique developmental period with its own set of tasks and milestones, and inattention to the needs of this population can have consequences for adolescent and adult functioning. While research on middle childhood is limited compared with adolescence and early childhood, we take a distinctively developmental approach and draw on existing conceptual models and research for adolescence and middle childhood to identify domains and constructs that describe the health and well-being of the middle childhood population. This paper is the first of two papers in a multi-stage process of creating such a monitoring system. In this paper, we (1) review and synthesize relevant existing conceptual frameworks (generally developed for adolescents in the U.S.) that could be adapted for the middle childhood population, (2) outline considerations for identifying multiple domains of functioning within the child and specify multiple contexts of influence for a middle childhood monitoring system, (3) propose criteria for identifying constructs and indicators, and (4) suggest potential constructs and indicators to be reviewed by various stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the U.S., middle childhood is commonly defined as ages 6–11. These ages encompass the years that U.S. children generally attend elementary school. In addition, this 6-year age span meshes well with other 6-year age groupings – 0–5 for early childhood and 12–17 for adolescence. Of course, each of these periods can be sub-divided, and other age categories are sometimes used as well.

References

  • Annie E. Casey Foundation (2006). Kids Count Data Book. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. K., & Olsen, J. A. (1997). Socialization in context: connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family, school, and neighborhood, and with peers. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(2), 287–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (1999). Monitoring and measuring child well-being: The international project. Washington DC: Child Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., & Wintersberger (Eds.) (1997). Monitoring and measuring the state of children –beyond survival, Eurosocial report no. 62. Vienna, Austria: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research.

  • Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., Scales, P., & Blyth, D. A. (1998). Beyond the village rhetoric: creating healthy communities for children and adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2(3), 138–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Hamilton, S. H., & Sesma Jr., A. (2006). Positive youth Development: Theory, research, and application. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.) Theoretical models of human development. Volume 1 of the Handbook of child psychology ((pp. 894–941)6th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, M. C., Park, M. J., Brindis, C. D., Pantell, R. H., & Irwin Jr., C. E. (2002). The health of america’s middle childhood population. San Francisco, CA: University of California, San Francisco, Public Policy Analysis and Education Center for Middle Childhood and Adolescent Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breinbauer, C., & Maddaleno, M. (2005). Youth: Choices and change. Promoting healthy behaviors in adolescents. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. (2008). Key indicators of child and youth well-being. NY: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Corbett, T. (2003). Social indicators as tools of public policy. In R. Weissberg, H. Walberg, M. O’Brien, & C. Kuster (Eds.) Long-term trends in the well-being of children and youth. Washington, D.C.: Child Welfare League of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Moore, K. A. (2003). Child and youth well-being: The social indicators field. In F. Jacobs, D. Wertlieb, & R. Lerner (Eds.) Handbook of applied developmental science: Promoting positive child, adolescent, and family development through research, policies, and programs (vol. 1, (pp. 437–467)). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (1999). Positive youth development in the United States: Research finding s on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Seattle: University of Washington, School of Social Work, Social Development Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child Trends (2002). Building a better system of child and family indicators. Washington, DC: Child Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., Gambone, M. A., & Smith, T. J. (2000). Youth development in community settings. In Public/Private Ventures (Ed.) Youth development: Issues, challenges and directions (pp. 281–324). Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (2001). To not fade away: Restoring civil identity among the young. In D. Ravitch, & J. P. Viteritti (Eds.) Making good citizens: Education and civil society. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1995). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. The Future of Children, 9(2), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, A. (2002). Community Programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrle, J., & Moore, K. A. (1999). 1997 NSAF benchmarking measures of child and family well-being: Report no. 6. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. America’s Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being (2007). Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available online at http://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/.

  • Hobbs, F., & Lippman, L. (1990). Children’s well-being: An international comparison. U.S. Bureau of the Census, International Population Reports, series P95, 80. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Huston, A., & Ripke, M. (2006). Developmental contexts in middle childhood. NY: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M., Shung-King, M., & Smith, C. (2005). South African child gauge 2005. Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K., Lamb, V. L., & Mustillo, S. K. (2001). Child and youth well-being in the United States, 1975–1998: some findings from a new index. Social Indicators Research, 56, 241–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M. (1998). Theoretical models of human development. Handbook of Child Psychology (vol. 1, 5th ed.). NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Jelicic, H., et al. (2005). Positive youth development, community contributions, and participation in community youth development programs: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H Study of positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. (1993). What’s working for today’s youth: The issues, the programs, and the leanings. Paper presented at the Institute for Children, Youth, and Families Fellows’ Colloquium, Michigan State University.

  • Pittman, K., Irby, M., & Ferber, T. (2000). Unfinished business: Further reflections on a decade of promoting youth development. Takoma Park, MD: The Forum for Youth Investment, International Youth Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A. (1997). Criteria of indicators of child well-being. In R. Hauser, B. Brown, & W. Poser (Eds.) Indicators of children’s well-being (pp. 36–44). NY: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., & Brown, B. (2006). Preparing indicators for policymakers and advocates. In A. Ben-Arieh & R. George (Eds.), Indicators of Children’s Well-being, Social Indicators Research Series 27, 93–103.

  • Moore, K. A., Brown, B., & Scarupa, H. J. (2003). The uses (and misuses) of social indicators: Implications for public policy. Research brief available online at http://www.childtrends.org/r-resbrief.asp.

  • Moore, K. A., & Halle, T. (2000). Preventing problems vs. promoting the positive: What do we want for our children? Research brief available online at http://www.childtrends.org/Files/posdev.pdf.

  • Moore, K. A., & Halle, T. (2001). Preventing problems vs. promoting the positive: What do we want for our children? In S. Hofferth & T. Owens (Eds.), Children at the millennium: Where have we come from, where are we going? Advances in Life Course Research series, JAI Press.

  • Moore, K. A., Halle, T. G., Vandivere, S., & Mariner, C. L. (2002). Scaling back survey scales: how short is too short. Sociological Methods & Research, 30(4), 530–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., & Lippman, L. (2005). What do children need to flourish. NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., Lippman, L., & Brown, B. (2004). Indicators of child well-being: the promise for positive youth development. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., Kristin, A., Bronte-Tinkew, J., Jekielek, S., Guzman, L., Ryan, S., et al. (2007). Developing Measures of Healthy Marriages and Relationships. In S. Hofferth, & L. Casper (Eds.) Handbook of Measurement Issues in Family Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., Theokas, C., Lippman, L., Block, M., Vandivere, S., & O’Hare, W. (2008). A microdata child well-being index: Conceptualization, creation, and findings. Child Indicators Research, 1, 17–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control [NCIPC] (2002). Leading Causes of Death Reports Data Base. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [URL: http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc].

  • National Children’s Office (2005). The development of a national set of child well-being indicators: Executive summary. Waterloo Road, Dublin: National Children’s Office. [URL: http://www.nco.ie].

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(5), 276–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7(2), 94–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 7, 2007. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

  • Whooley, M. A., Avins, A. L., Miranda, J., & Browner, W. S. (1997). Casefinding instruments for depression: Two questions are as good as many. Journal of Internal Medicine, 12, 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was completed under Subcontract Agreement Number 388sc, for Grant Number U45 MC00023 to UCSF from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Anderson Moore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, K.A., Theokas, C. Conceptualizing a Monitoring System for Indicators in Middle Childhood. Child Ind Res 1, 109–128 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-008-9011-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-008-9011-9

Keywords

Navigation