Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biomass production potential of grasslands in the oak savanna region of Minnesota, USA

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biomass harvested from grasslands formerly used for forage production or set aside for conservation has been identified as a potential source of bioenergy feedstocks. Our objective was to characterize yield and chemical composition of biomass harvested from existing grasslands in the oak savanna region of Minnesota and to determine whether aggregated soil properties and grassland type influence biomass yield and feedstock properties. The influence of soil type and dominant functional plant groups on biomass yield, theoretical ethanol yield, and mineral, ash, and lignocellulosic concentration was measured on biomass harvested from 32 grassland sites. Soils with high productivity ratings, as measured by the Minnesota Crop Productivity Index, produced 36 % more biomass than lower quality soils. Grasslands dominated by warm-season species produced 18 % more biomass than those dominated by cool-season species, when measured after senescence during the late-fall harvest time. Biomass harvested from sites dominated by cool-season grasses had higher N, Mg and Cl concentrations than those dominated by warm-season grasses, suggesting that such grasslands could have lower efficiency in thermochemical conversion processes and that repeated harvesting from such grasslands could remove nutrients from the systems. In addition, glucose and xylose concentrations were slightly higher in biomass from sites dominated by warm-season grasses, which resulted in an estimated additional 12 L Mg−1 of ethanol over those dominated by cool-season grasses. Combined with the greater yields, warm-season grasslands could produce an additional 376 L ha−1 year−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler PR, Sanderson MA, Boateng AA, Weimer PJ, Jung HG (2006) Biomass yield and biofuel quality of switchgrass harvested in fall or spring. Agron J 89:1518–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adler PR, Sanderson MA, Goslee SC (2008) Management and composition of conservation lands in the northeastern United States. In” Proceedings of the 4th Eastern Native Grass Symposium, Lexington, 3–6 October 2004, pp 187–198.

  3. Anderson B (1995) Establishing dryland forage grasses. Neb GuideB-18, issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the US Department of Agriculture. University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources

  4. Anderson WF, Akin DE (2008) Structural and chemical properties of grass lignocelluloses related to conversion for biofuels. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:355–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakker KK, Higgins KF (2009) Planted grassland and native sod prairie: equivalent habitat for grassland birds? West N Am Nat 69:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borchert JR (1950) The climate of the central North American grassland. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 40:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christian DG, Yates NE, Rich AB (2006) The effect of harvest date on the yield and mineral content of Phalaris arundinacea L. genotype screened for their potential as energy crops in southern England. J Sci food agric 86:1181–1188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. De La Torre Ugarte DG, Walsh ME, Shapouri H, Slinsky SP (2003) The economic impacts of bioenergy crop production on U.S. agriculture. Ag Economic Report No. 816, USDA.

  9. Dien BS et al (2006) Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass and switchgrass. Biomass and Bioenergy 30:880–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Doxon ED, Carroll JP (2007) Vegetative and invertebrate community characteristics of Conservation Reserve Program fields relative to gamebirds in western Kansas. Am Midl Nat 158:243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eggebo SL, Higgins KF, Naugle DE, Quamen FR (2003) Effects of CRP field age and cover type on ring-necked pheasants in eastern South Dakota. Wildl Soc Bull 31:779–785

    Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein HE, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, Coffin DP (1997) Productivity patterns of C3 and C4 functional types in the US Great Plains. Ecology 78:722–731

    Google Scholar 

  13. ESRI (2008) ArcGIS version 9.2. ESRI, Redlands

  14. Federer WT, King F (2007) Variations on split plot and split block experiment designs. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Florine SE, Moore KJ, Fales SL, White TA, Burras CL (2006) Yield and composition of herbaceous biomass harvested from naturalized grassland in southern Iowa. Biomass and Bioenergy 30:522–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronxs

    Google Scholar 

  17. Griffin JL, Jung GA (1983) Leaf and stem forage quality of big bluestem and switchgrass. Agron J 75:723–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grime JP, Brown VK, Thompson K, Masters GJ, Hillier SH, Clarke IP, Askew AP, Corker D, Kielty JP (2000) The response of two contrasting limestone grasslands to simulated climate change. Science 289:762–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grime JP (1997) Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science 277:1260–1261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamelinck CN, van Hooijdonk G, Faaij APC (2005) Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long term. Biomass and Bioenergy 28:384–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris PJ, Hartley RD, Barton GE (1982) Evaluation of Stabalized diazonium salts for the detection of phenolic consistutents of plant-cell walls. J Sci Food Agric 33:516–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hartzler RG, Buhler DD (2000) Occurrence of common milkweed (Asclepia syriaca) in cropland and adjacent areas. Crop Prot 19:363–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Heisler JL, Knapp AK (2008) Temporal coherence of aboveground net primary productivity in mesic grasslands. Ecography 31:408–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jenny H (1980) The soil resource. Springer, NewYork

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Jewett JG (1996) A survey of CRP land in Minnesota: I. legume and grass persistence. J Prod Agric 9:528–534

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jog S, Kindscher K, Questad E, Foster B, Loring H (2007) Floristic quality as an indicator of native species diversity in managed grasslands. Nat Areas J 26:149–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Knapp AK et al (1993) Landscape patters in soil-plant water relations and primary production in Tallgrass Prairie. Ecology 74:519–560

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lauenroth WK (1979) Grassland primary production: North American grasslands in perspective. In: French NR (ed) Perspectives in grassland ecology. Ecological studies, vol 32. Springer, New York, pp 3–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Lazarus W (2008) Energy crop production costs and breakeven prices under Minnesota conditions. University of Minnesota, Applied Economics Staff paper, P08-11

  30. Lee DK, Owens VN, Doolittle JJ (2007) Switchgrass and soil carbon sequestration response to ammonium nitrate, manure and harvest frequency on Conservation Reserve Program Land. Agron J 99:462–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lewandowski I, Kicherer A (1997) Combustion quality of biomass: practical relevance and experiments to modify the biomass quality of Miscanthus x giganteus. Eur J Agron 6:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Minnesota Climatology Working Group (2008) St Paul. http://climate.umn.edu. Accessed 1 Jan 2008 (online database)

  33. McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83:37–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Conservation Reserve Program datalayer: Minnesota statewide (2007) USDA FSA, Saint Paul (computer file, available by petition)

  35. Mulkey VR, Owens VN, Lee DK (2006) Management of switchgrass-dominated Conservation Reserve Program lands for biomass production in South Dakota. Crop Sci 46:712–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. National Agriculture Statistics Services (2008) Washington. http://www.nass.usda.gov. Accessed 18 Feb 2008 (online database)

  37. Natural Resource Conservation Service (2008) http://www.mn.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/ecs/agron/crp/planform.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2008 (online database)

  38. Nashaar-El HM et al (2009) Mineral concentration in selected native temperate grasses with potential use as biofuel feedstock. Bioresour Technol 10:3525–3531

    Google Scholar 

  39. Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:23–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Perlack RD et al (2005) Biomass as a feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. USDA-DOE. www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/publications.html. Accessed 1 Jul 2009

  41. Posler GL, Lenssen AW, Fine GL (1993) Forage yield, quality, compatibility, and persistence of warm-season grass–legume mixtures. Agron J 85:554–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Reid RL, Jung GA, Thayne WV (1988) Relationships between nutritive quality and fiber components of cool season and warm season forages: a retrospective study. J Anim Sci 66:1275–1291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Robertson GP et al (1999) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rock KP et al (2009) Variation due to growth environment in alfalfa yield, cellulosic ethanol traits and paper pulp characteristics. Bioenergy Res 2:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rottgermann M, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W, Dietz H (2000) Linear relationships between aboveground biomass and plant cover in low open herbaceous vegetation. J Vegetation Sci 11:145–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. SAS Institute (2008) Computer program. SAS Institute, Cary

  47. Sala OE, Parton WJ, Joyce LA, Lauenroth WK (1988) Primary production of the Central Grassland Region of the United States. Ecology 69:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sanderson MA, Adler PR (2008) Perennial forages as second generation bioenergy crops. Int J Mol Sci 9:768–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schmer MR et al (2007) Establishment stand thresholds for switchgrass grown as a bioenergy crop. Crop Sci 46:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sluiter A et al (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Technical Reports NREL/TP-510-42618. National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden

  51. Terri J, Stowe L (1976) Climatic patterns and distribution of C4 grasses in North America. Oecologia 23:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tillman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C (2001) Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294:843–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Vogel KP et al (2007) Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: harvest and nitrogen management. Agron J 94:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Vogel KP, Brejda JJ, Walters DT, Buxton DR (2002) Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: Harvest and nitrogen management. Agron J 94:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Weigelt A, Weisser WW, Buchmann N, schere-Corensen M (2009) Biodiversity for multifunctional grasslands: equal productivity in high-diversty low-input and low-diversity, high input systems. Biogeosci 6:1695–1706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Wellie-Stephan O (1998) Development of grasses adapted for production of bioenergy. In: Kopetz H, Weber T, Palz W, Chartier P, Ferrero GL (eds) Biomass for energy and industry: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference, Würzburg, Germany, 8–11 June 1998, pp 1050–1051

  58. Wilson JF (1993) Organization of forage plant tissues. In: Jung HG, Buston DR, Hatfield RD, Ralph J (eds) Forage cell wall structure and digestibility, vol 1993. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 685–714

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wolf DD et al (1989) No-till establishment of perennial, warm-season grasslands for biomass production. Biomass 20:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

    Peter A. Gillitzer, Donald L. Wyse & Craig C. Sheaffer

  2. Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA

    Steven J. Taff

  3. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA

    Clarence C. Lehman

Authors
  1. Peter A. Gillitzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donald L. Wyse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Craig C. Sheaffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Steven J. Taff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Clarence C. Lehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald L. Wyse.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 108 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillitzer, P.A., Wyse, D.L., Sheaffer, C.C. et al. Biomass production potential of grasslands in the oak savanna region of Minnesota, USA. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 131–141 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9233-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9233-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation