Abstract
The aim of this paper was to explore the issue of consent when considering the use of a life saving but not necessarily restorative surgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury. A previous study has investigated the issue amongst 500 healthcare workers by using a two-part structured interview to assess opinion regarding decompressive craniectomy for three patients with varying injury severity. A visual analogue scale was used to assess the strengths of their opinions both before and after being shown objective outcome data. Opinions were assessed in a number of scenarios, one of which was that the participants themselves were the injured party. The implication, which was clearly stated, was whether they would provide consent for the procedure to be performed. The study demonstrated that participants were relatively risk aversive in regards to survival with severe disability especially when the injury was severe and there was high probability of that outcome occurring. This finding was not however universal and a minority of participants would provide consent even when the possibility of survival with severe disability was very high. The obvious difficulty comes when considering consent in patients who are unable to express their wishes. In order to address this issue we propose a model of consent based on a balance of the various factors that seem to be of material relevance. These include the severity of the injury, the willingness or otherwise to accept survival with severe disability and the willingness to “risk” the possibility of an unacceptable outcome in order to achieve an acceptable outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Druml, C. 2004. Informed consent of incapable (ICU) patients in Europe: existing laws and the EU Directive. Current Opinion in Critical Care 10: 570–573.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. The meaning and justification of informed consent. In: Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 77–98.
Dunn, L.B., M.A. Nowrangi, B.W. Palmer, D.V. Jeste, and E.R. Saks. 2006. Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: A review of instruments. The American Journal of Psychiatry 163: 1323–1334.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. The meaning and justification of informed consent. In: Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 69–77
Gillett, G.R., S. Honeybul, K.M. Ho, and C.R. Lind. 2010. Neurotrauma and the RUB: Where tragedy meets ethics and science. Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 727–730.
Aarabi, B., D.C. Hesdorffer, E.S. Ahn, C. Aresco, T.M. Scalea, and H.M. Eisenberg. 2006. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery 104: 469–479.
Albanèse, J., M. Leone, J.R. Alliez, J.M. Kaya, F. Antonini, B. Alliez, and C. Martin. 2003. Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: Evaluation of the effects at one year. Critical Care Medicine 31: 2535–2538.
Guerra, W.K., M.R. Gaab, H. Dietz, J.U. Mueller, J. Piek, and M.J. Fritsch. 1999. Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling: Indications and results. Journal of Neurosurgery 90: 187–196.
Polin, R.S., M.E. Shaffrey, C.A. Bogaev, N. Tisdale, T. Germanson, B. Bocchicchio, and J.A. Jane. 1997. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosurgery 41: 84–94.
Jennett, B., and M. Bond. 1975. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1: 480–484.
Honeybul, S., S. O'Hanlon, and K.M. Ho. 2011. Decompressive craniectomy for severe head injury: Does an outcome prediction model influence clinical decision-making? Journal of Neurotrauma 28: 13–19.
Honeybul, S., S. O'Hanlon, K.M. Ho, and G. Gillett. 2011. The influence of objective prognostic information on the likelihood of informed consent for decompressive craniectomy: A study of Australian anaesthetists. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 39: 659–665.
Honeybul, S., S. O'Hanlon, and K.M. Ho. 2012. Access to reliable information about long-term prognosis influences clinical opinion on use of lifesaving intervention. PLoS One 7: e32375.
Perel, P., M. Arango, T. Claydon, P. Edwards, E. Komolafe, S. Poccock, I. Roberts, H. Shakur, E. Steyerberg, and S. Yutthakasemsunt. 2008. Predicting outcome after brain injury: Practical prognostic models based on a large cohort of international patients. BMJ 23: 425–429.
Roberts, I., D. Yates, P. Sandercock, B. Farrell, J. Wassenberg, G. Lomas, R. Cottingham, P. Svodoba, N. Brayley, G. Mazairac, V. Laloe, A. Munoz-Sanchez, M. Arango, B. Hartzenberg, H. Khamis, S. Yutthakasemsunt, E. Komolafe, F. Olldashi, Y. Yadav, F. Murillo-Cabezas, H. Shakur, P. Edwards, and CRASH trial collaborators. 2004. Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): Randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 364: 1321–1328.
Honeybul, S., K.M. Ho, C.R.P. Lind, and G.R. Gillett. 2009. The retrospective application of a prediction model to patients who have had a decompressive craniectomy for trauma. Journal of Neurotrauma 26: 2179–2183.
Honeybul, S., K.M. Ho, C.R.P. Lind, and G.R. Gillett. 2010. Observed versus predicted outcome for decompressive craniectomy: A population based study. Journal of Neurotrauma 27: 1225–1232.
Campbell, A., Gillett, G., Jones G. 2005. Medical Ethics Oxford: University Press. 20–27.
SUPPORT Principal investigators. 1995. A controlled trial to improve care of seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment (SUPPORT). JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 274: 1591–1598.
Larach, D.R., D.B. Larach, and M.G. Larach. 2009. A life worth living: Seven years after Craniectomy. Neurocritical Care 11: 106–111.
Benejam, B., J. Sahuquillo, M.A. Poca, L. Frascheri, E. Solana, P. Delgado, and C. Junqué. 2009. Quality of life and neurobehavioral changes in survivors of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Journal of Neurology 256: 1126–1133.
Gillett, G. 2011. Minimally conscious states, deep brain stimulation and what is worse than futility. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8(2): 145–150.
Gillett, G., and S. Walker. 2012. The evolution of informed consent. Journal of Law and Medicine 19: 673–677.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Honeybul, S., Ho, K.M. & Gillett, G.R. Traumatic Brain Injury: An Objective Model of Consent. Neuroethics 7, 11–18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9175-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9175-3