Abstract
Psychological life is subject to the influence of a constructed and potentially reconstituted past, as well as to future anticipated outcomes and expectations. Human behaviour occurs along a temporal trajectory that marks the projects individuals adopt in their quests of human action. Explanations of social behaviour are limited insofar as they exclude a historical concern with human purpose. In this paper, we draw on Bartlett’s notion of collective remembering to argue that manifest social relations are rooted in past events that give present behaviours meaning and justification. We further propose an epidemiological time-series framework for social representations, that are conceptualised as evolving over time and that are subject to a ‘ratchet effect’ that perpetuates meaning in a collective. We argue that understanding forms of social behaviour that draw on lay explanations of social relations requires a deconstructive effort that maps the evolutionary trajectory of a representational project in terms of its adaptation over time. We go on to illustrate our proposal visiting data that emerged in an inquiry investigating Maltese immigrants’ perspectives towards their countries of settlement and origin. This data reveals an assimilationist acculturation preference amongst the Maltese in Britain that seems incongruous with the current climate of European integration and Maltese communities in other countries around the world. We demonstrate that a historical concern with regard to this apparent behaviour helps explain how Maltese immigrants to Britain opt for certain forms of intercultural relations than others that are normally preferable. We demonstrate that these preferences rely on an evolved justification of the Maltese getting by with foreign rulers that other scholars have traced back to the medieval practice of chivalry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Typical indigenous Maltese pasties
Farmed rabbits are a Maltese delicacy and commonly regarded as the national dish
The chance of being convicted at some time during settlement
References
Abric, J.-C. (1993). Central system, peripheral system: their functions and roles in the dynamic of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 75–78.
Abric, J.-C. (2001). A structural approach to social representations. In G. Philogene & K. Deaux (Eds.), Representations of the social: bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 42–47). Oxford: Blackwell.
Asch, S. E. (1952/1987). Social psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Assman, J. (2010). Communicative and cultural memory. In A. Erll, & Nünning (Eds.), A companion to cultural memory studies (pp. 109–119). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Bartlett, F. C. (1923). Psychology and primitive culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bartlett, F. C. (1925). The social functions of symbols. Astralasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy, 3, 1–11.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm of research on social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29, 163–186.
Berry, J. W. (2011). Integration and Multiculturalism: ways towards social solidarity. Papers on Social Representations, 20, 2.1–2.21.
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: research and applications (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chryssides, A., Dashtipour, P., Keshet, S., Righi, C., Sammut, G., & Sartawi, M. (2009). Commentary: we don’t share! The social representation approach, enactivism and the fundamental incompatibilities between the two. Culture & Psychology, 15, 83–95.
Daanen, P., & Sammut, G. (2012). G.H. Mead and knowing how to act: practical meaning, routine interaction and the theory of interobjectivity. Theory and Psychology. doi:10.1177/0959354311409794.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dench, G. (1975). Maltese in London: a case-study in the erosion of ethnic consciousness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1913). Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology (Translated by H.A. Ruger & C.E. Bussenius). New York: Columbia University Press.
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.
Knights, M. (this issue). Taking a historical turn: possible points of connection between Social Pyschology and History.
Moscovici, S. (2000). The phenomenon of social representations. In G. Duveen (Ed.), Social representations: explorations in social psychology (pp. 18–77). Cambridge: Polity.
Sammut, G. (2010). Points of view and the reconciliation of identity oppositions: examples from the Maltese in Britain. Papers on Social Representations, 19(1), 9.1–9.22.
Sammut, G. (2012). The immigrants’ point of view: acculturation, social judgment, and the relative propensity to take the perspective of the other. Culture & Psychology, 18(2), 184–197.
Sammut, G., & Bauer, M. (2011). Social influence: Modes and modalities. In D. Hook, B. Franks, & M. Bauer (Eds.), The social psychology of communication (pp. 87–106). Hampshire: Palgrave.
Sammut, G., & Gaskell, G. (2010). Points of view, social positioning and intercultural relations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40(1), 47–64.
Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., & Sartawi, M. (2012). Social influence and social change: States and strategies of social capital. In B. Wagoner, E. Jensen, & J. Oldmeadow (Eds.), Culture and social change: transforming society through the power of ideas (pp. 263–274). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Sartawi, M. (2010). Interobjectivity: representations and artefacts in Cultural Psychology. Culture & Psychology, 16, 451–463.
Sperber, D. (1990). The epidemiology of beliefs. In C. Fraser & G. Gaskell (Eds.), The social psychology of widespread beliefs (pp. 25–44). Oxford: Clarendon.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Harre, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. Harre & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: moral contexts of international action (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Blackwell.
Tsirogianni, S., & Gaskell, G. (2011). The role of plurality and context in social values. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 41(4), 441–465.
Wagner, W., & Hayes, N. (2005). Everyday discourse and common-sense—the theory of social representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1981). On Grice’s theory of conversation. In P. Werth (Ed.), Conversation and discourse (pp. 155–178). London: Croom Helm.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sammut, G., Tsirogianni, S. & Wagoner, B. Representations from the Past: Social Relations and the Devolution of Social Representations. Integr. psych. behav. 46, 493–511 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-012-9212-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-012-9212-0