Abstract
Background
Hand surgeons treat trapeziometacarpal arthrosis as if everyone with the disease presents for treatment despite evidence that suggests that trapeziometacarpal arthrosis is a normal part of human aging for which—it seems safe to assume—most people never seek medical attention.
Questions/purposes
The aims of our study were (1) to confirm the prevalence of radiographic trapeziometacarpal arthrosis in a very large sample and to determine if age and sex are associated with (2) any radiographic evidence of trapeziometacarpal arthrosis; and (3) radiographic evidence of severe trapeziometacarpal arthrosis.
Methods
A total of 2321 patients 31 years or older with radiographs obtained during treatment of a distal radius fracture at a tertiary care medical center emergency department between 2002 and 2012 were analyzed. Trapeziometacarpal arthrosis was graded using the 3-point scale of Sodha et al. (none, definite, destroyed trapeziometacarpal joint); we used regression analyses to determine the association of age (in 10-year age groups) and sex with the presence of trapeziometacarpal arthrosis.
Results
The prevalence of trapeziometacarpal arthrosis steadily increased to 85% between the ages of 71 and 80 years and reached 100% in women (with 50% of them being classified as severe) aged 91 years or older and 93% in men of 81 years or older. Severe arthrosis was more prevalent at earlier ages among women and reached 35% in women and 34% in men who were 81 years or older. Logistic regression identified higher age as the strongest factor associated with trapeziometacarpal arthrosis, but sex was also a factor.
Conclusions
Radiographic trapeziometacarpal arthrosis is an expected part of human aging. Given that only three patients in this large cohort had evidence of prior surgery, it seems that most people adapt to trapeziometacarpal arthrosis. Treatments that optimize adaptation in patients who present with trapeziometacarpal arthrosis-related symptoms and disability merit additional study.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong AL, Hunter JB, Davis TR. The prevalence of degenerative arthritis of the base of the thumb in post-menopausal women. J Hand Surg Br. 1994;19:340–341.
Dahaghin S, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ, Pols HA, Hazes JM, Koes BW. Prevalence and pattern of radiographic hand osteoarthritis and association with pain and disability (the Rotterdam study). Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:682–687.
Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Balding DJ, Cressie NAC, Fisher NI, Johnstone IM, Kadane JB, Ryan LM, Scott DW, Smith AFM, Teugels JL, eds. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2003:598–626.
Haara MM, Heliovaara M, Kroger H, Arokoski JP, Manninen P, Karkkainen A, Knekt P, Impivaara O, Aromaa A. Osteoarthritis in the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Prevalence and associations with disability and mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1452–1457.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
Marshall M, van der Windt D, Nicholls E, Myers H, Dziedzic K. Radiographic thumb osteoarthritis: frequency, patterns and associations with pain and clinical assessment findings in a community-dwelling population. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:735–739.
Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB. Prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2614–2618.
Sonne-Holm S, Jacobsen S. Osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: a study of radiology and clinical epidemiology. Results from the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:496–500.
Wilder FV, Barrett JP, Farina EJ. Joint-specific prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hand. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:953–957.
Acknowledgments
We thank Associate Professor David Zurakowski at Harvard Medical School for his help with the statistical analysis of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
One of the authors (SJEB) certifies that she has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, greater than USD 10,000 from Anna Foundation|NOREF, Genootschap Noorthey and Stichting Vreedefonds, The Netherlands, for Scientific Research. One of the authors (MGJSH) certifies that he has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, greater than USD 10,000 from Anna Foundation|NOREF, and Marti-Keunig Eckhart Stichting, The Netherlands, for Scientific Research. One of the authors (DR) certifies that he has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, less than USD 10,000 from Skeletal Dynamics LLC (Miami, FL, USA) and Wright Medical Technology, Inc (Arlington, TN, USA).
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
About this article
Cite this article
Becker, S.J.E., Briet, J.P., Hageman, M.G.J.S. et al. Death, Taxes, and Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 3738–3744 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3243-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3243-9