Abstract
The introduction of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has substantially improved the outcome of CML patients. Despite the positive results, problems and questions remained. This was the rationale to setup trials for treatment optimization, where imatinib was administered in higher dose and/or in combination with other therapy but where also new and potentially more efficacious second-generation TKI, nilotinib and dasatinib, were investigated. This review summarizes data of recently published first-line studies with the standard treatment imatinib 400 mg as one study arm. Results of randomized comparisons to higher-dose imatinib treatment, nilotinib or dasatinib are discussed. With regard to outcome interpretation, general aspects on statistical issues and endpoint definitions are put into focus. Considering decidedly increased longevity thanks to TKI treatment, future research should include the evaluation of the quality of life (QoL). Relating also to QoL, safe ways of drug discontinuation need to be investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Hehlmann R, Berger U, Pfirrmann M, et al. Drug treatment is superior to allografting as first line therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2007;109:4686–92.
• Hehlmann R, Lauseker M, Jung-Munkwitz S, et al. Tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d versus 400 mg/d versus 400 mg/d plus interferon-alpha in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1634–42. CML study IV of the German CML study group. Results demonstrated significant better MMR rates at 12 months (primary study endpoint) of tolerability adapted IM 800 vs. IM 400.
O'Brien S, Guilhot F, Larson RA, et al. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:994–1004.
•• Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6041–51. ELN recommendations on managing CML.
Deininger M, O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, et al. International Randomized Study of Interferon Vs STI571 (IRIS) 8-year follow up: sustained survival and low risk for progression or events in patients with newly diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) treated with imatinib. Blood. 2009;114:1126.
Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K, et al. Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science. 2001;293:876–80.
Hochhaus A, Kreil S, Corbin A, et al. Roots of clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy. Science. 2001;293:2163.
Ernst T, La Rosée P, Müller MC, Hochhaus A. BCR-ABL mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2011;25:997–1008.
Hochhaus A. Cytogenetic and molecular mechanisms of resistance to imatinib. Semin Hematol. 2003;40:69–79.
Bixby D, Talpaz M. Mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia and recent therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance. ASH Educ Program Book. 2009;2009:461–76.
Cortes JE, Kantarjian HM, Goldberg SL, et al. High-dose imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: high rates of rapid cytogenetic and molecular responses. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4754–9.
• Preudhomme C, Guilhot J, Nicolini FE, et al. Imatinib plus peginterferon alfa-2a in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2511–21. French Spirit trial. Results demonstrated significant shorter time to “optimal molecular response” of IM+IFN vs. IM 400.
•• Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2251–9. Nilotonib showed significantly higher rate of MMR at 12 months when compared to imatinib.
•• Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, et al. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2260–70. Dasatinib showed significantly higher rate of confirmed CCR at 12 months when compared to imatinib.
• Pfirrmann M, Hochhaus A, Lauseker M, et al. Recommendations to meet statistical challenges arising from endpoints beyond overall survival in clinical trials on chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2011;25:1433–8. Statistical considerations on the analysis of CML studies including explanation of the impact of the cumulative incidence function.
Cortes JE, Maru A, Souza CAAD, et al. Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia–BELA trial: 24-month follow-up. Blood. 2011;118:455.
Kantarjian H, Cortes J. Considerations in the management of patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1512–6.
Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB. Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat Med. 2007;26:2389–430.
Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, et al. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2006;108:1809–20.
Kantarjian H, O'Brien S, Jabbour E, et al. Impact of treatment end point definitions on perceived differences in long-term outcome with tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3173–8.
Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2408–17.
Sokal JE, Cox EB, Baccarani M, et al. Prognostic discrimination in “good-risk” chronic granulocytic leukemia. Blood. 1984;63:789–99.
Hasford J, Pfirrmann M, Hehlmann R, et al. A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon Alfa. Writing committee for the collaborative CML prognostic factors project group. J Natl Canc Inst. 1998;90:850–8.
Hasford J, Baccarani M, Hoffmann V, et al. Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. Blood. 2011;118:686–92.
Kantarjian HM, Talpaz M, O'Brien S, et al. Dose escalation of imatinib mesylate can overcome resistance to standard-dose therapy in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2003;101:473–5.
Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM, Jones D, et al. Imatinib mesylate dose escalation is associated with durable responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after cytogenetic failure on standard-dose imatinib therapy. Blood. 2009;113:2154–60.
Cortes J, Giles F, O'Brien S, et al. Results of high-dose imatinib mesylate in patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of interferon-alfa. Blood. 2003;102:83–6.
Kantarjian H, Talpaz M, O'Brien S, et al. High-dose imatinib mesylate therapy in newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2004;103:2873–8.
Castagnetti F, Palandri F, Amabile M, et al. Results of high-dose imatinib mesylate in intermediate Sokal risk chronic myeloid leukemia patients in early chronic phase: a phase 2 trial of the GIMEMA CML Working Party. Blood. 2009;113:3428–34.
Hughes TP, Branford S, White DL, et al. Impact of early dose intensity on cytogenetic and molecular responses in chronic- phase CML patients receiving 600 mg/day of imatinib as initial therapy. Blood. 2008;112:3965–73.
Baccarani M, Rosti G, Castagnetti F, et al. Comparison of imatinib 400 mg and 800 mg daily in the front-line treatment of high risk, Philadelphia-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: a European LeukemiaNet study. Blood. 2009;113:4497–504.
Cortes JE, Baccarani M, Guilhot F, et al. Phase III, randomized, open-label study of daily imatinib mesylate 400 mg versus 800 mg in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase using molecular end points: tyrosine kinase inhibitor optimization and selectivity study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:424–30.
Essers MA, Offner S, Blanco-Bose WE, et al. IFNalpha activates dormant haematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Nature. 2009;458:904–8.
Burchert A, Mueller MC, Kostrewa P, et al. Sustained molecular response with interferon Alfa maintenance after induction therapy with imatinib plus interferon Alfa in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1429–35.
Pfirrmann M, Hasford J. A simulation study using validated prognostic factors to assess expected long-term survival. Methods Inform Med. 2005;44:577–83.
• Simonsson B, Gedde-Dahl T, Markevarn B, et al. Combination of pegylated IFN-alpha 2b with imatinib increases molecular response rates in patients with low- or intermediate-risk chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011;118:3228–35. Nordic study group trial showing superiority of IM + IFN.
Johnson-Ansah H, Guilhot J, Rousselot P, et al. Pegylated interferon a2a (PegIFN) at the dose of 45{mu}g per week in combination with imatinib 400 mg is the recommended initial dose for patients (pts) with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP): results from the French SPIRIT trial of the French CML Group (FI LMC). Blood. 2011;118:456.
Gafter-Gvili A, Leader A, Gurion R, et al. High-dose imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients—systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Hematol. 2011;86:657–62.
• Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:841–51. Most recent update with 24-months follow-up data of the ENESTnd trial.
• Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE, et al. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood. 2012;119:1123–9. Most recent update with 24-months follow-up data of the DASISION trial.
Signorovitch JE, Wu EQ, Betts KA, et al. Comparative efficacy of nilotinib and dasatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of randomized trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27:1263–71.
Gambacorti-Passerini C, Khoury HJ, Pinczowski H, et al. Clinical activity of bosutinib by mutational status in patients with previously treated Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. ASH Annu Meet Abstr. 2010;116:3434.
Cortes JE, Kim D-W, Pinilla-Ibarz J, et al. Initial findings from the PACE trial: a pivotal phase 2 study of ponatinib in patients with CML and Ph + ALL resistant or intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib, or with the T315I mutation. ASH Annu Meet Abstr. 2011;118:109.
Mahon FX, Delbrel X, Cony-Makhoul P, et al. Follow-up of complete cytogenetic remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after cessation of interferon alfa. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:214–20.
Bonifazi F, de Vivo A, Rosti G, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia and interferon-alpha: a study of complete cytogenetic responders. Blood. 2001;98:3074–81.
Rousselot P, Huguet F, Rea D, et al. Imatinib mesylate discontinuation in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete molecular remission for more than 2 years. Blood. 2007;109:58–60.
• Mahon FX, Rea D, Guilhot J, et al. Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:1029–35. The trial provides results on molecular remission durability after treatment discontinuation.
Rea D, Rousselot P, Nicolini F, et al. Cessation of dasatinib or nilotinib therapy in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients with sustained complete molecular responses. Haematologica. 2011;96:423–4.
Korn EL, Freidlin B, Abrams JS. Overall survival as the outcome for randomized clinical trials with effective subsequent therapies. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2439–42.
Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood. 2006;108:28–37.
Müller MC, Cross NC, Erben P, et al. Harmonization of molecular monitoring of CML therapy in Europe. Leukemia. 2009;23:1957–63.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Arthur Gil (IBE München) and Gabriele Bartsch (Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg) for their contribution.
Disclosure
S. Saussele: honoraria from Novartis, BMS, and Pfizer; M. Pfirrmann: none.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saussele, S., Pfirrmann, M. Clinical Trials in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 7, 109–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-012-0118-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-012-0118-1